Advancing Greenwashing Audits: An Innovative Fuzzy Decision-Making Framework Integrating KochSnowflake Sets and Euclidean Distance-BasedExpert Weighting

  • Authors

    • İpek Yaylalı School of Business, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
    • Feyza Dereköy School of Business, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
    • Serhat Yüksel School of Business, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
    • Hasan Dinçer School of Business, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
    • Serkan Eti IMU Vocational School, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
    https://doi.org/10.14419/58zqe953

    Received date: September 1, 2025

    Accepted date: September 27, 2025

    Published date: October 17, 2025

  • Euclidean distance; expert weighting; Koch Snowflake fuzzy sets; CIMAS; greenwashing; audit

  • Abstract

    This study aims to identify the priority criteria that should be considered for establishing more effective audit processes to prevent green-washing. To achieve this objective, a novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model is developed. Euclidean distance-based expert weighting technique is employed to determine the importance weights of six experts based on their demographic characteristics, thereby reducing subjectivity in expert judgments. CIMAS is applied to compute the importance weights of the criteria. Furthermore, the newly developed Koch Snowflake fuzzy sets are integrated into the model to represent uncertainties more precisely, thereby minimizing infor-mation loss and increasing the robustness of the results. The originality of the study lies in combining these advanced methods to create a more reliable and effective analytical framework that fills a significant methodological gap in the literature on greenwashing audit processes. The findings reveal that compliance with assurance standards is the most significant factor for enhancing audit effectiveness, followed by corporate transparency and the risk level of greenwashing practices. These results not only contribute to the theoretical literature by offering a new methodological approach but also provide practical implications for policymakers and auditors in designing strategies to strengthen audit mechanisms, improve accountability, and reduce the proliferation of greenwashing practices.

  • References

    1. Al‐Hajaya, K., Almahameed, E. A. A., Sawan, N., Altarawneh, M. S., Eltweri, A., & Salem, R. (2025). Audit Committees and the Quality of Standalone Sustainability Reporting, Considering the Moderating Role of External Assurance: Evidence From the Global Chemical Industry. Busi-ness Strategy and the Environment.
    2. Bai, C., Yao, D., & Xue, Q. (2025). Does artificial intelligence suppress firms' greenwashing behavior? Evidence from robot adoption in China. En-ergy Economics, 142, 108168.
    3. Darsono, D., Ratmono, D., Tujori, A., & Clarisa, T. Y. (2025). The relationship between ESG, financial performance, and cost of debt: the role of independent assurance. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1), 2437137.
    4. Forliano, C., Battisti, E., De Bernardi, P., & Kliestik, T. (2025). Mapping the greenwashing research landscape: a theoretical and field analysis. Re-view of Managerial Science, 1-50.
    5. Han, S., Zhang, X., Liu, X., Zheng, Y., & Qu, J. (2025). ATSDPC: Adaptive two-stage density peaks clustering with hybrid distance based on dis-persion coefficient. Expert Systems with Applications, 127639.
    6. Hashed, A. A., Almaqtari, F. A., Elmashtawy, A., & Raweh, N. A. M. (2025). The Role of Governance Audit Mechanisms on Environmental Sus-tainability and Emissions in Saudi Arabia Under ESG Regulations. Sustainability, 17(9), 4020.
    7. Hossain, M. Z. (2025). Forensic Auditing in Environmental and Social Governance (ESG): Detecting Fraud and Ensuring Compliance. Available at SSRN 5255556.
    8. Huang, Z., Shi, Y., & Jia, M. (2025). Greenwashing: A systematic literature review. Accounting & Finance, 65(1), 857-882.
    9. Ketterling, C. I., & Germany, B. (2025). The Global Landscape of ESG Guidelines and Standards: Corporate Social Responsibility, Responsible Investment, and ESG Compliance (No. 47efm_v1). Center for Open Science.
    10. Kou, G., Eti, S., Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., Sağır, S., & Köklü, K. (2025). Next-gen fractal fuzzy sets with Koch Snowflake, Cantor Dust, and Sierpin-ski Triangle structures for space-based solar energy storage investments. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 171, 111052.
    11. Liu, G., Fang, Y., Qian, H., Ding, Z., Zhang, A., & Zhang, S. (2025). Incentive or catering effect of environmental subsidies? Evidence from ESG reports on greenwashing. International Review of Financial Analysis, 103, 104242.
    12. Lublóy, Á., Keresztúri, J. L., & Berlinger, E. (2025). Quantifying firm-level greenwashing: A systematic literature review. Journal of Environmental Management, 373, 123399.
    13. Lublóy, Á., Keresztúri, J. L., & Berlinger, E. (2025). Quantifying firm-level greenwashing: A systematic literature review. Journal of Environmen-tal Management, 373, 123399.
    14. Mohd Razali, F., Sulaiman, N., Abdul Manan, D. I., & Said, J. (2025). Sustainability of Audit Profession in Digital Technology Era: The Role of Competencies and Digital Technology Capabilities to Detect Fraud Risk. SAGE Open, 15(1), 21582440241304974.
    15. Nemes, N., Scanlan, S. J., Smith, P., Smith, T., Aronczyk, M., Hill, S., ... & Stabinsky, D. (2022). An integrated framework to assess greenwashing. Sustainability, 14(8), 4431.
    16. Nuraini, L., & Amrulloh, A. (2024). Auditors and Sustainability Reporting: Ensuring Accuracy and Transparency in ESG Disclosure. Researcher Academy Innovation Data Analysis, 1(2), 112-124.
    17. Rawat, P. Sustainability Reporting and Assurance (2025). The Role of Auditors in Verifying Corporate Environmental and Social Performance. Journal of Informatics Education and Research, 5(1).
    18. Ridley, J., & Gulko, N. (2025). 30 years of leading thoughts for professional modern internal auditing: science, craft, art, and advisor. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting.
    19. Ruggeri, M., Vinci, G., Ruggieri, R., & Savastano, M. (2025). Facing the risk of greenwashing in the ESG report of global companies: the im-portance of life cycle thinking. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(3), 4216-4234.
    20. Seow, R. Y. C. (2025). Environmental, social, and governance reporting in family firms: The critical role of CEO attributes. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(1), 70-87.
    21. Sheta, M. A. E., Osman, M., & Elamer, A. (2025). Sustainability Champions: The Transformative Role of Internal Auditors in ESG Assurance: A Systematic Review and Future Directions. Journal of Accounting Literature.
    22. Syam, M., Djaddang, S., & Roziq, M. (2025). The Digital Transformation of Auditing: Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities. Syahril and., Hasnawati and Roziq, Mohammad and., Harnovinsah.
    23. Taunaumang, H., Lima, R & Gomez, R. (2025). The Influence of Audit Technology on Audit Efficiency and Effectiveness: Auditor’s Perspective. Journal Markcount Finance, 3(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.70177/jmf.v3i1.2139
    24. Von Rosing, M., Shepperson, L., & Czichos, H. (2025). External ESG auditing: The what, why, who, and how. In The Sustainability Handbook, Volume 1 (pp. 661-669). Elsevier.
    25. Wen, T., & Wang, Y. (2025). The Mirage of Sustainable Development: The Impact of ISO 14001 Certification on Corporate Greenwashing. Busi-ness Strategy & Development, 8(2), e70112.
    26. Yalçın, G. C., Kara, K., Edinsel, S., Kaygısız, E. G., Simic, V., & Pamucar, D. (2025). Authentication system selection for performance appraisal in human resource management using an intuitionistic fuzzy CIMAS-ARLON model. Applied Soft Computing, 171, 112786.
    27. Yu Gu., Jun Dai., Miklos A. Vasarhelyi.2023. Audit 4.0-based ESG assurance: An example of using satellite images on GHG emissions. Interna-tional Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 100625.
    28. Zhang, C. The Role of Big Data in Unveiling Greenwashing: A Study on its Impact on Corporate ESG Performance. Available at SSRN 5098276.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Yaylalı, İpek, Dereköy, F., Yüksel , S. ., Dinçer , H. ., & Eti , S. . (2025). Advancing Greenwashing Audits: An Innovative Fuzzy Decision-Making Framework Integrating KochSnowflake Sets and Euclidean Distance-BasedExpert Weighting. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 14(6), 355-364. https://doi.org/10.14419/58zqe953