The Strategic Performance of The Central Bank of India: A Mediat‎ing Role of Dynamic Capabilities and Moderating Role of Ambidexterity

  • Authors

    • Darpan Tripathi School of Business Management, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
    • Shuhymee Ahmad School of Business Management, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
    • Mohd Nizam M Sarkawi School of Business Management, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
    https://doi.org/10.14419/v0sx8509

    Received date: July 5, 2025

    Accepted date: August 24, 2025

    Published date: September 16, 2025

  • Ambidexterity; Dynamic Capabilities; Entrepreneurial Capabilities; Innovation Capabilities; Strategic Performance

  • Abstract

    The purpose of this study was to understand the mediating role of dynamic capabilities and the moderating role of ambidexterity in the relationship between innovation capabilities, entrepreneurial capabilities, and strategic performance. The study was conducted in the context of the Central Bank of India, and data were collected based on a survey-based questionnaire. The branches of the Central Bank of India located in ‎Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata, Bangalore, and Lucknow were targeted, and a sample of 222 respondents was collected. Using Partial ‎Least Squares – Structural Equation Model, the study found that both innovation capabilities and entrepreneurial capabilities have a significant impact on dynamic capabilities and strategic performance. Furthermore, the study found that dynamic capabilities have a significant impact on strategic performance. The study found that dynamic capabilities significantly mediate the impact of innovation capabilities and ‎entrepreneurial capabilities on strategic performance. In addition, the study found that ambidexterity positively moderates the impact of ‎innovation capabilities on dynamic capabilities, while it has no moderating role for the impact of innovation entrepreneurial capabilities on ‎strategic performance. However, the study found that ambidexterity does not moderate the impact of dynamic capabilities on strategic performance‎.

  • References

    1. Abdurrahman, A., Gustomo, A., & Prasetio, E. A. (2024). Impact of Dynamic Capabilities on Digital Transformation and Innovation to Improve Banking Performance: A TOE Framework Study. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 100215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100215.
    2. Abu-Rumman, A. (2021). Transformational leadership and human capital within the disruptive business environment of academia. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 13(2), 178-187. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v13i2.5652.
    3. Abu-Rumman, A., Al Shraah, A., Al-Madi, F., & Alfalah, T. (2021). Entrepreneurial networks, entrepreneurial orientation, and performance of small and medium enterprises: Are dynamic capabilities the missing link? Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-021-00170-8.
    4. Ali, G. A., Hilman, H., & Gorondutse, A. H. (2020). Effect of entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation, and total quality management on performance: Evidence from Saudi SMEs. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(4), 1503-1531. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2019-0391.
    5. AlTaweel, I. R., & Al-Hawary, S. I. (2021). The mediating role of innovation capability on the relationship between strategic agility and organizational performance. Sustainability, 13(14), 7564. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147564.
    6. Andrade, J., Franco, M., & Mendes, L. (2021). Technological capacity and organisational ambidexterity: the moderating role of environmental dynamism on Portuguese technological SMEs. Review of Managerial Science, 15, 2111-2136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00416-x.
    7. Arranz, N., Arroyabe, M., Li, J., & Fernandez de Arroyabe, J. C. (2020). Innovation as a driver of eco-innovation in the firm: An approach from the dynamic capabilities theory. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1494-1503. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2448.
    8. Bitencourt, C. C., de Oliveira Santini, F., Ladeira, W. J., Santos, A. C., & Teixeira, E. K. (2020). The extended dynamic capabilities model: A meta-analysis. European Management Journal, 38(1), 108-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.04.007.
    9. Broadstock, D. C., Matousek, R., Meyer, M., & Tzeremes, N. G. (2020). Does corporate social responsibility impact firms' innovation capacity? The indirect link between environmental & social governance implementation and innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 119, 99-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.014.
    10. Buccieri, D., Javalgi, R. G., & Cavusgil, E. (2020). International new venture performance: Role of international entrepreneurial culture, ambidextrous innovation, and dynamic marketing capabilities. International Business Review, 29(2), 101639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101639.
    11. Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T., & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 515-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(01)00203-6.
    12. Ceptureanu, S. I., Ceptureanu, E. G., & Cerqueti, R. (2022). Innovation ambidexterity and impact on the performance in IT companies: the moderating role of business experience. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34(7), 746-759. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1918337.
    13. Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Mariani, M., & Fosso Wamba, S. (2023). The consequences of innovation failure: An innovation capabilities and dynamic capabilities perspective. Technovation, 128, 102858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102858.
    14. Chen, Q., Wang, C.-H., & Huang, S.-Z. (2021). Effects of organizational innovation and technological innovation capabilities on firm performance: evidence from firms in China’s Pearl River Delta. In Inside the Changing Business of China (pp. 72-96). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003057352-6.
    15. Choithani, T., Chowdhury, A., Patel, S., Patel, P., Patel, D., & Shah, M. (2024). A comprehensive study of artificial intelligence and cybersecurity on bitcoin, crypto currency and banking system. Annals of Data Science, 11(1), 103-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-022-00433-5.
    16. Ciampi, F., Demi, S., Magrini, A., Marzi, G., & Papa, A. (2021). Exploring the impact of big data analytics capabilities on business model innovation: The mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Business Research, 123, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.023.
    17. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. 2nd edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    18. Cuevas-Vargas, H., Parga-Montoya, N., & Fernández-Escobedo, R. (2019). Effects of entrepreneurial orientation on business performance: The mediating role of customer satisfaction—A formative–Reflective model analysis. SAGE Open, 9(2), 2158244019859088. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019859088.
    19. Dua, P. (2023). Monetary policy framework in India. In Macroeconometric Methods: Applications to the Indian Economy (pp. 39-72). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7592-9_3.
    20. Elidjen, E., Pertiwi, A., Mursitama, T. N., & Beng, J. T. (2022). How potential and realized absorptive capacity increased ability to innovate: the moderating role of structural ambidexterity. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-12-2021-0298.
    21. Farzaneh, M., Wilden, R., Afshari, L., & Mehralian, G. (2022). Dynamic capabilities and innovation ambidexterity: The roles of intellectual capital and innovation orientation. Journal of Business Research, 148, 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.030.
    22. Ferreira, J., Cardim, S., & Coelho, A. (2021). Dynamic capabilities and mediating effects of innovation on the competitive advantage and firm’s performance: The moderating role of organizational learning capability. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12, 620-644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00655-z.
    23. Ferreira, J., Coelho, A., & Moutinho, L. (2020). Dynamic capabilities, creativity and innovation capability and their impact on competitive advantage and firm performance: The moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Technovation, 92-93, 102061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.11.004.
    24. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104.
    25. Gallego-Gomez, C., & De-Pablos-Heredero, C. (2020). Artificial intelligence as an enabling tool for the development of dynamic capabilities in the banking industry. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), 16(3), 20-33. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEIS.2020070102.
    26. Goswami, A., & Gulati, R. (2022). Economic slowdown, NPA crisis and productivity behavior of Indian banks. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(4), 1312-1342. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2020-0010.
    27. Gupta, N., & Mahakud, J. (2020). CEO characteristics and bank performance: evidence from India. Managerial auditing journal, 35(8), 1057-1093. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-03-2019-2224.
    28. Gupta, R. (2023). Industry 4.0 adaption in indian banking Sector—A review and agenda for future research. Vision, 27(1), 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262921996829.
    29. Hair, J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7.
    30. Hair, J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7.
    31. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (Vol. 7). In: Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
    32. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Thiele, K. O. (2017). Mirror, mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45, 616-632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0517-x.
    33. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202.
    34. Hair Jr, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069.
    35. He, X., & Wu, X. (2022). Social networks and ambidextrous innovation in SMEs: the mediating role of dynamic capabilities and the moderating role of technological turbulence. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2022.2157710.
    36. He, X., Wu, X., Croasdell, D., & Zhao, Y. (2022). Dynamic capability, ambidexterity and social network—empirical evidence from SMEs in China. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 29(6), 958-974. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-05-2020-0181.
    37. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.
    38. Jayaraman, A. R., & Bhuyan, P. (2020). Impact of NPA and loan write-offs on the profit efficiency of Indian banks. DECISION, 47(1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-020-00235-9.
    39. Jena, R. K. (2022). Examining the factors affecting the adoption of blockchain technology in the banking sector: An extended UTAUT model. International journal of financial studies, 10(4), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs10040090.
    40. Kanoujiya, J., Bhimavarapu, V. M., & Rastogi, S. (2023). Banks in India: a balancing act between profitability, regulation and NPA. Vision, 27(5), 650-660. https://doi.org/10.1177/09722629211034417.
    41. Kaur, B., Kiran, S., Grima, S., & Rupeika-Apoga, R. (2021). Digital banking in Northern India: The risks on customer satisfaction. Risks, 9(11), 209. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9110209.
    42. Khan, O., Daddi, T., & Iraldo, F. (2020a). Microfoundations of dynamic capabilities: Insights from circular economy business cases. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1479-1493. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2447.
    43. Khan, O., Daddi, T., & Iraldo, F. (2020b). The role of dynamic capabilities in circular economy implementation and performance of companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(6), 3018-3033. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2020.
    44. Kim, C. Y., Lim, M. S., & Yoo, J. W. (2019). Ambidexterity in external knowledge search strategies and innovation performance: Mediating role of balanced innovation and moderating role of absorptive capacity. Sustainability, 11(18), 5111-5111. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185111.
    45. Kolapo, F. T., Mokuolu, J. O., Dada, S. O., & Adejayan, A. O. (2021). Strategic marketing innovation and bank performance in Nigeria [Article]. Innovative Marketing, 17(1), 120-129. https://doi.org/10.21511/im.17(1).2021.10.
    46. Kori, B. W., Muathe, S. M., & Maina, S. M. (2021). Strategic Intelligence and Firm Performance: An Analysis of the Mediating Role of Dynamic Capabilities from Commercial Banks in Kenya. Journal of Business, 9(1), 1-11.
    47. Lestari, S. D., Leon, F. M., Widyastuti, S., Brabo, N. A., & Putra, A. H. P. K. (2020). Antecedents and consequences of innovation and business strategy on performance and competitive advantage of SMEs. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(6), 365-378. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no6.365.
    48. Malali, A. B., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2020). Application of artificial intelligence and its powered technologies in the indian banking and financial industry: An overview. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science, 25(4), 55-60.
    49. Manohar, S., Mittal, A., & Marwah, S. (2020). Service innovation, corporate reputation and word-of-mouth in the banking sector: A test on multigroup-moderated mediation effect. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(1), 406-429. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-05-2019-0217.
    50. Matarazzo, M., Penco, L., Profumo, G., & Quaglia, R. (2021). Digital transformation and customer value creation in Made in Italy SMEs: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Business Research, 123, 642-656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.033.
    51. Memon, M. A., Ting, H., Cheah, J.-H., Thurasamy, R., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2020). Sample size for survey research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 4(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.4(2)01.
    52. Migdadi, M. M. (2020). Knowledge management, customer relationship management and innovation capabilities. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 36(1), 111-124. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-12-2019-0504.
    53. Mikalef, P., Krogstie, J., Pappas, I. O., & Pavlou, P. (2020). Exploring the relationship between big data analytics capability and competitive performance: The mediating roles of dynamic and operational capabilities. Information & Management, 57(2), 103169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.05.004.
    54. Mikalef, P., Pateli, A., & van de Wetering, R. (2021). IT architecture flexibility and IT governance decentralisation as drivers of IT-enabled dynamic capabilities and competitive performance: The moderating effect of the external environment. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(5), 512-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1808541.
    55. Mikalef, P., van de Wetering, R., & Krogstie, J. (2021). Building dynamic capabilities by leveraging big data analytics: The role of organizational inertia. Information & Management, 58(6), 103412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103412.
    56. Mohamad, M. R., Kuswantoro, F., & Omar, A. R. C. (2012). Competitive strategies and firm performance : a comparative study of Malaysian and Indonesian small and medium enterprises. 3rd International Conferene of Business and Economic Research (3rd ICBER 2012) Proceeding.,
    57. Mohan, R., & Ray, P. (2023). Non-performing Assets of Indian Banking: An Evolutionary Journey. In D. K. Srivastava & K. R. Shanmugam (Eds.), India’s Contemporary Macroeconomic Themes: Looking Beyond 2020 (pp. 267-313). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5728-6_12.
    58. Murad, M., Othman, S., & Kamarudin, M. A. I. (2025). Entrepreneurial university input, core strategic plan and output: research on undergraduates entrepreneurial behaviour and career. Entrepreneurship Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41959-025-00137-w.
    59. Nakku, V. B., Agbola, F. W., Miles, M. P., & Mahmood, A. (2020). The interrelationship between SME government support programs, entrepreneurial orientation, and performance: A developing economy perspective. Journal of Small Business Management, 58(1), 2-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2019.1659671.
    60. Pasunoori, V., Kumar, B. M., Janakiram, M., Sastry, E., & Indira, M. (2024). A study on financial performance of central bank of India. International Research Journal on Advanced Engineering and Management (IRJAEM), 2(03), 276-280. https://doi.org/10.47392/IRJAEM.2024.0041
    61. Peng, M. Y.-P., Zhang, Z., Yen, H.-Y., & Yang, S.-M. (2019). Dynamic capabilities and firm performance in the high-tech industry: quadratic and moderating effects under differing ambidexterity levels. Sustainability, 11(18), 5004. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185004.
    62. R, A., Kuanr, A., & Kr, S. (2021). Developing banking intelligence in emerging markets: Systematic review and agenda. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 1(2), 100026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2021.100026.
    63. Randhawa, K., Wilden, R., & Gudergan, S. (2021). How to innovate toward an ambidextrous business model? The role of dynamic capabilities and market orientation. Journal of Business Research, 130, 618-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.046.
    64. Renaud, O., & Victoria-Feser, M.-P. (2010). A robust coefficient of determination for regression. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 140(7), 1852-1862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2010.01.008.
    65. Report, M. C. (2024). Central Bank of India Ltd. Money Control. https://www.moneycontrol.com/financials/centralbankindia/results/yearly/CBO01
    66. Robertson, J., Caruana, A., & Ferreira, C. (2023). Innovation performance: The effect of knowledge-based dynamic capabilities in cross-country innovation ecosystems. International Business Review, 32(2), 101866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101866.
    67. Rono, L. C., Korir, M., & Komen, J. (2021). Moderating Effect of Organizational Ambidexterity on the Relationship between Dynamic Capabilities and Performance of Food and Beverages Companies in Kenya. African Journal of Education, Science and Technology, 6(2), 53-65.
    68. Sari, D., Kusuma, B. A., Sihotang, J., & Febrianti, T. (2023). The role of entrepreneurial marketing & innovation capability in the performance of SMEs during covid-19 pandemic: Evidence of MSMEs in West Java. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2194091. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2194091.
    69. Sawaean, F., & Ali, K. (2020). The impact of entrepreneurial leadership and learning orientation on organizational performance of SMEs: The mediating role of innovation capacity. Management Science Letters, 10(2), 369-380. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.8.033.
    70. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. john wiley & sons.
    71. Shafique, I., Kalyar, M. N., Shafique, M., Kianto, A., & Beh, L.-S. (2022). Demystifying the link between knowledge management capability and innovation ambidexterity: organizational structure as a moderator. Business Process Management Journal, 28(5/6), 1343-1363. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-11-2021-0713.
    72. Shankar, A., Jebarajakirthy, C., & Ashaduzzaman, M. (2020). How do electronic word of mouth practices contribute to mobile banking adoption? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52, 101920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101920.
    73. Sharma, M., & Choubey, A. (2022). Green banking initiatives: a qualitative study on Indian banking sector. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(1), 293-319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01426-9.
    74. Sijabat, E. A. S., Nimran, U., Utami, H. N., & Prasetya, A. (2021). The effects of dynamic capabilities, entrepreneurial creativity and ambidextrous innovation on firm's competitiveness. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), 711-721.
    75. Singh, A., Singh, H. P., Alam, F., & Agrawal, V. (2022). Role of education, training, and E-learning in sustainable employment generation and social empowerment in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 14(14), 8822. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148822.
    76. Singh, B., & Rao, M. (2016). Effect of intellectual capital on dynamic capabilities. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 29(2), 129-149. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-12-2014-0225.
    77. Singh, B., & Rao, M. K. (2017). To Gear Up Firm Performance in Banking Industry: The Role of Dynamic Capability [Article]. Global Business Review, 18(4), 1019-1040. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150917692404.
    78. Singh, B., & Verma, P. (2023). How does intellectual capital drive firm performance via dynamic capabilities: evidence from India [Article]. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2022-0555.
    79. Singh, S. K., Del Giudice, M., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Latan, H., & Sohal, A. S. (2022). Stakeholder pressure, green innovation, and performance in small and medium‐sized enterprises: The role of green dynamic capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 500-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2906.
    80. Soluk, J., Miroshnychenko, I., Kammerlander, N., & De Massis, A. (2021). Family influence and digital business model innovation: the enabling role of dynamic capabilities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(4), 867-905. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258721998946.
    81. Strønen, F., Hoholm, T., Kværner, K. J., & Støme, L. N. (2017). Dynamic capabilities and innovation capabilities: The case of the ‘Innovation Clinic’. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 13(1), 89-116. https://doi.org/10.7341/20171314.
    82. Suddaby, R., Coraiola, D., Harvey, C., & Foster, W. (2020). History and the micro‐foundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic management journal, 41(3), 530-556. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3058.
    83. Teece, D. J. (2010). Technological innovation and the theory of the firm: the role of enterprise-level knowledge, complementarities, and (dynamic) capabilities. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (Vol. 1, pp. 679-730). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01016-6.
    84. Teece, D. J. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and entrepreneurial management in large organizations: Toward a theory of the (entrepreneurial) firm. European Economic Review, 86, 202-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.11.006.
    85. Teece, D. J. (2020). Hand in glove: Open innovation and the dynamic capabilities framework. Strategic Management Review, 1(2), 233-253. https://doi.org/10.1561/111.00000010.
    86. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18(7), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z.
    87. Times, T. E. (2024). RBI imposes Rs 1.45 cr penalty on Central Bank of India. The Economic Times. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/banking/finance/rbi-imposes-rs-1-45-cr-penalty-on-central-bank-of-india/articleshow/111002168.cms?from=mdr.
    88. Valdez-Juárez, L. E., & Castillo-Vergara, M. (2021). Technological capabilities, open innovation, and eco-innovation: Dynamic capabilities to increase corporate performance of SMEs. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010008.
    89. Vu, H. M. (2020). A review of dynamic capabilities, innovation capabilities, entrepreneurial capabilities and their consequences. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(8), 485-494. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no8.485.
    90. Wong, K. K.-K. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin, 24(1), 1-32.
    91. Yuan, C., Xue, D., & He, X. (2021). A balancing strategy for ambidextrous learning, dynamic capabilities, and business model design, the opposite moderating effects of environmental dynamism. Technovation, 103, 102225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102225.
    92. Yunita, T., Sasmoko, S., Bandur, A., & Alamsjah, F. (2023). Organizational ambidexterity: The role of technological capacity and dynamic capabilities in the face of environmental dynamism. Heliyon, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14817.
    93. Zhou, L., Peng, M. Y.-P., Shao, L., Yen, H.-Y., Lin, K.-H., & Anser, M. K. (2021). Ambidexterity in social capital, dynamic capability, and SMEs’ performance: quadratic effect of dynamic capability and moderating role of market orientation. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 584969. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584969.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Tripathi, D., Ahmad, S., & M Sarkawi, M. N. (2025). The Strategic Performance of The Central Bank of India: A Mediat‎ing Role of Dynamic Capabilities and Moderating Role of Ambidexterity. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 14(5), 578-592. https://doi.org/10.14419/v0sx8509