Classification performance assessment in side scan sonar image while underwater target object recognition using random forest classifier and support vector machine

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    Ocean mine have been a major threat to the safety of vessels and human lives for many years. Identification of mine-like objects is a pressing need for military, and other ocean meets. In mine, countermeasures operations, sonar equipment are utilised to detect and classify mine- like objects if their sonar signatures are similar to known signatures of mines. The classification of underwater mines is an important  task,  for  the  safety of  ports,  harbors  and  the  open  sea.  Mine detection is needed in military applications because it has been a threat to many lives and vessels. Although the task of finding mine like objects has received recent attention, very little has been published on the problem of discriminating mine-like (target) objects (MLO) and non-mine like (target) objects of similar size and shape. This paper deals with the recognition of mine like and non mine like objects. The recognition is done through robust Random Forest technique.


  • Keywords


    Underwater mine, SONAR image, side scan sonar image, random forest classifier, mine like object detection, non mine like object detection.

  • References


      [1] Tai F, Kraus D & Zoubir AM, “Contributions to Automatic Target Recognition Systems for Underwater Mine Classification”, IEEE Transactions on Geo science and Remote Sensing, (2015).

      [2] Bryan DT, Jered C, Mahmood RA & Schock SG, “A Multichannel Canonical Correlation Analysis Feature Extraction with Application to Buried Underwater Target Classification”, IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Network Proceedings, (2006).

      [3] Stewart WK, Min J & Marra M, “A neural network approach to classification of sidescan sonar imagery from a midocean ridge area”, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering (1994).

      [4] Castellano AR & Gray BC, “Autonomous interpretation of side scan sonar returns”, Symposium on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Technology, 1990.

      [5] JoEllen W & Robert JM & Jason S, “Contourlet Detection and Feature Extraction for Automatic Target Recognition”, IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics San Antonio, (2009).

      [6] Breiman L, “Random Forests”, Machine Learning, Vol.45, (2001), pp. 5-32.

      [7] Johnson S & Deaett A, “The application of automated recognition techniques to side-scan sonar imagery”, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., Vol.19, No.1, (1994), pp.138–144.

      [8] Henriksen L, “Real-time underwater object detection based on an electricallyscanned high-resolution sonar”, In Proc. Symp. Auton. UnderwaterVeh. Technol., (1994), pp.99–104.

      [9] Fandos R. & Zoubir AM, “Optimal feature set for automaticdetection and classification of underwater objects in SAS images”, IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., Vol.5, No.3, (2011), pp.454–468.

      [10] Piper JE, Lim R, Thorsos EI & Williams KL, “Buried spheredetection using a synthetic aperture sonar”, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., Vol.34, No.4, (2009), pp.485–494.

      [11] Hayes M & Gough P, “Synthetic aperture sonar: A review ofcurrent status”, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., Vol.34, No.3, (2009), pp. 207–224.

      [12] Piper J, Commander K, Thorsos E & Williams K, “Detection of buried targets using a synthetic aperture sonar”, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., Vol.27, No.3, (2002), pp.495–504.

      [13] Fandos R, Zoubir AM & Siantidis K, “Unified design of a featurebased ADAC system for mine hunting using synthetic aperturesonar”, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., Vol.52, No.5, (2014). pp.2413–2426.

      [14] Myers V. & Williams D, “Adaptive multiview target classification insynthetic aperture sonar images using a partially observable Markovdecision process”, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., Vol.37, No.1, (2012), pp.45–55.

      [15] Fei T. & Kraus D, “An expectation-maximization approach assisted byD empster Shafer theory and its application to sonar image segmentation”, in Proc. IEEE ICASSP, (2012), pp.1161–1164.

      [16] Fandos R & Zoubir AM, “Enhanced initialization scheme for a three region Markovian segmentation algorithm and its application to SAS images”, Proc. 10th ECUA, Vol.3 (2010), pp.1323– 1331.

      [17] Kumudham R & Rajendran V, “Object recognition in underwater sonar images using support vector machine”, International Journal of Control Theory and Applications (IJCTA), Vol.10, No. 32, (2017), pp.283-290.

      [18] Reed S, Petillot Y & Bell J, “An automatic approach to the detectionand extraction of mine features in sidescan sonar”, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., Vol.28, No.1, (2003), pp.90–105.

      [19] Yang M, Kpalma K & Ronsin J, “A Survey of Shape Feature Extraction Techniques”, InTech, Vol.3 (2008), pp.43–90.

      [20] Tang Y, Li B, Ma H & Lin J, “Ring-projection-wavelet-fractal signatures:A novel approach to feature extraction”, IEEE Trans. CircuitsSyst. II, Analog Digit. Signal Process., Vol.45, No.8, (1998), pp.1130–1134.

      [21] Weszka JS, C. R. Dyer, and A. Rosenfeld, “A comparative study of texture measures for terrain classification,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern.,vol. SMC-6, No.4, pp. 269–285, (1976).

      [22] Kumudham R & Rajendran V, “Side scan sonar image denoising and classification”, Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical & Control Systems, (2017), pp.55-65.

      [23] Kumudham R & Rajendran V, “Implementation of various segmentation algorithms on side scan sonar images and analysing its performance”, ARPN, Vol.12, No.8, (2017), pp.2396-2400.

      [24] Kumudham R & Rajendran V, “Speeded up robust feature extraction from underwater sonar images”, International Journal of Control Theory and Appplications (IJCTA), Vol.10, No.32, (2017), pp.277-282.

      [25] Kumudham R, DhanalakshmiASG, & Rajendran V, “Comparison of The Performance Metrics of Median Filter and Wavelet Filter when applied on Sonar Images for Denoising”, IEEE sponsored International Conference on Computation of Power Energy Information and Communication, (2016).


 

View

Download

Article ID: 12448
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i2.21.12448




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.