A Cardio pulmonary resuscitation device for stretchers

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) machine is a class III medical device for use in cardiac arrests. This budget device has been fabricated in house and calibrated using data from sensors used when an expert administers CPR on a patient in the face of emergency. Also, the device has its own feedback sensorics to optimize CPR delivery primarily the full chest recoil. The device was tested on mannequin and its performance was identical to trained CPR experts in terms of rate and pressure. On fulfilling all ethical requirements, this device has the potential to be a life saver in India and worldwide.

     


  • Keywords


    Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), electro-pneumatics, emergency care, feedback control.

  • References


      [1] Tanmay N & Arnab G, “Cardiovascular diseases risk factors in Asian Indian Population: A Systematic Review”, Journal of Cardiovascular Disease, Pubmed, Vol.4, No.4, (2013), 222–228.

      [2] Callaway CW, Donnino MW, Fink EL, Geocadin RG, Golan E, Kern KB & Zimmerman JL, “Part 8: post–cardiac arrest care: 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care”, Circulation, Vol.132, (2015), pp.465-482.

      [3] Goldberger ZD, Chan PS, Berg RA, “For the American Heart Association Get with the guidelines Resuscitation (formerly the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) Investigators. Duration of resuscitation efforts and survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest: An observation study”, Lancet, Vol.380, (2012), pp.1473-81.

      [4] Steen S, “Treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation”, Resuscitation, Vol.67, No.1, (2005), pp.25-30.

      [5] Giraud R, “The LUCAS 2 chest compression device is not always efficient: an echo graphic confirmation”, Annals of emergency medicine, Vol.65, No.1, (2015), pp.23-26.

      [6] Perkins GD, “Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial”, Lancet, Vol.385, (2015), pp.947-955.

      [7] Physio-Control, Inc., Redmond, WA (US), Front Part for Support Structure for CPR, US Patent No. 8,753,298 A1, (2015).

      [8] Weil Institute of Critical Care Medicine, Rancho Mirage, CA (US), “Enhanced Chest Compressor”, US 8,790,285 B2, (2007).

      [9] Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV, Eindhoven (NL), “Pediatric Patient-Safe CPR Device”, US 2013/0102936 A1, (2011).

      [10] Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV, “Eindhoven (NL),” Resuscitation Device”, US 2014/0236055 A1, (2012).

      [11] Greater Glasgow Health Board, Glasgow, “CPR Assistance Apparatus”, WO 2008/025995 A2, (2006).


 

View

Download

Article ID: 11837
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i2.21.11837




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.