Learning Mendelian Genetics Using A Game Based Learning Activities

  • Authors

    • Jannah Kristine M. Aliling College of Teacher Education, Batangas State University, The National Engineering University - Pablo Borbon Campus
    • Marylina F. Aquino College of Teacher Education, Batangas State University, The National Engineering University - Pablo Borbon Campus
    • Joanne A. Arellano College of Teacher Education, Batangas State University, The National Engineering University - Pablo Borbon Campus
    • Celso G. Zara College of Teacher Education, Batangas State University, The National Engineering University - Pablo Borbon Campus
    https://doi.org/10.14419/4s6nz990

    Received date: October 8, 2025

    Accepted date: November 4, 2025

    Published date: November 9, 2025

  • Game-Based Learning Activities; ‎Mendelian Genetics;‎ Gamification;‎ Learning Gain;‎ Grade 8 Science‎.

  • Abstract

    This study aimed to develop and evaluate a game-based learning ‎activity on Mendelian Genetics to improve student engagement, ‎understanding, and motivation. The activity was designed using the ‎ASSURE model, a systematic approach to instructional planning. A ‎mixed-methods design was used. The quantitative phase involved a ‎one-group pre-test and post-test with 45 Grade 8 students from Ilat ‎National High School to assess learning gains. The qualitative phase ‎involved unstructured interviews to explore students’ learning ‎experiences. The game, titled “The Gene Quest: Mendelian ‎Genetics,” featured animations, interactive Punnett square tasks, ‎and a leaderboard to enhance participation. Six experts—four ‎science teachers and two IT professionals—evaluated the game ‎based on content accuracy, design, usefulness, and ease of use. Data ‎collection tools included a 30-item multiple-choice test, expert ‎evaluation sheets, and interview responses. Quantitative data were ‎analyzed using weighted and composite means and the Hake gain ‎score, while thematic analysis was used for qualitative data. The ‎game received excellent ratings across all evaluation criteria. A Hake ‎gain score of 0.96 indicated a high level of learning improvement. ‎Students described the game as enjoyable and engaging. They ‎reported better understanding of genetics concepts, improved ‎confidence in learning, and acknowledged certain challenges during ‎gameplay. The findings suggest that game-based learning is an ‎effective strategy for teaching complex topics like Mendelian ‎Genetics. It supports deeper understanding, boosts motivation, and ‎enhances academic performance‎.

  • References

    1. A. A. Beylefeld, & M. C. Struwig, “A gaming approach to learning medical microbiology: Students' experiences of flow.” African Journal of Health Professions Education, 7(1), 17–20. 2015.
    2. A. Duncan, “Beyond fun and games: The impact of gamification on critical thinking and problem-solving skills,” edCircuit, 2024. https://edcircuit.com/beyond-fun-and-games.
    3. A. Eisenkraft, “The ASSURE model for effective instructional design. In Instructional Models in K-12 Classrooms” (pp. 1-15). IGI Global. 2018.
    4. A. L. Coil, M. P. Wenderoth, R. J. Cunningham, & K. Johnson, “A beginner's guide to Punnett squares. The American Biology Teacher, 79(6), 464–471. 2017.
    5. A. Perrin and M. Duggan, “The state of online learning in the U.S.: Challenges and experiences of students in 2020–2021,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 461–478, 2021.
    6. A. S. Gillis and N. Barney, “What is gamification? How it works and how to use it,” Search HR Software, 2025. https://www.techtarget.com/searchhrsoftware/definition/gamification.
    7. A. Sage, “Punnett Farms: A study on game-based learning in genetics education,” J. Educ. Technol., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 123–135, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1177/10468781231220728.
    8. B. Koidl, R. Klemke, and M. Specht, “The strength and direction of difficulty adaptation affect situational interest in game-based learning,” Comput. Educ., vol. 194, p. 104694, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104694.
    9. C. Chu, R. Nielsen, & Y. Wu, “Inferring De Novo Repeat Motifs from Short Sequence Reads.” Molecular Biology and Evolution, 35(12), 2913–2927. 2018.
    10. C. M. Wu, E. Schulz, K. Gerbaulet, T. J. Pleskac, and M. Speekenbrink, “Under pressure: The influence of time limits on human exploration,” in Proc. Annu. Meet. Cogn. Sci. Soc., vol. 41, pp. 3578–3584, 2019.
    11. D. B. Clark, E. E. Tanner-Smith, & S. S. Killingsworth, “Digital games for learning: A meta-analysis and narrative review (Report).” Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. 2015.
    12. D. Karpicke and J. R. Blunt, “Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping,” Science, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199327.
    13. D. Zou, R. Zhang, H. Xie, and F. L. Wang, “Digital game-based learning of information literacy: Effects of gameplay modes on university students’ learning performance, motivation, self-efficacy, and flow experiences,” Australas. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 145–158, 2021, https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6512.
    14. E. Hughes and M. O'Reilly, “Interactive tools and simulations: Enhancing student understanding of genetic concepts and Punnett squares,” J. Biol. Educ., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 285–298, 2021.
    15. F. Habib, “The use of gamification in online teaching to enhance student engagement and motivation” Master's thesis, Dalarna University. 2021.
    16. G. Lampropoulos and A. Sidiropoulos, “Impact of gamification on students’ learning outcomes and academic performance: A longitudinal study comparing online, traditional, and gamified learning,” Educ. Sci., vol. 14, no. 4, p. 367, 2024, https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040367.
    17. G. Zichermann and C. Cunningham, Gamification by Design: Implementing Game Mechanics in Web and Mobile Apps, O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2015.
    18. H. G. H. Low & M. Ellefson, “Punnett Farms: Developing An Immersive Educational Game-Based Platform for Learning Genetics. Simulation & Gaming,” 55(2), 302-322. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/10468781231220728.
    19. H. R. Cimer, “What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views,” Res. Gate, 2017. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268255789.
    20. J. Contente and C. Galvão, “STEM education and problem-solving in space science: A case study with CanSat,” Educ. Sci., vol. 12, no. 4, p. 251, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040251.
    21. J. K. Acosta-Medina, M. L. Torres-Barreto, and A. F. Cárdenas-Parga, “Students’ preference for the use of gamification in virtual learning environments,” Australas. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 145–158, 2021, https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6512.
    22. J. Nisbet. Game-based learning: Pros, cons & implementation tips for educators. Prodigy. 2023. https://www.prodigygame.com/main-en/blog/game-based-learning/.
    23. J. Smith, “The impact of game-based e-learning on student motivation and learning outcomes,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 561–572, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000397.
    24. K. D. Stiller, “Effects on motivation, cognitive load, and performance in game-based learning,” Front. Educ., 2019.
    25. L. Boctor, “Active-learning strategies: the use of a game to reinforce learning in nursing education. A case study.” Nurse Educ Pract. 2013 Mar;13(2):96-100. Epub 2012 Aug 19. PMID: 22910398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2012.07.010.
    26. L. S. Mahler and R. E. Mayer, “Anime as a medium for science learning,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12660.
    27. M. Dieser & F. X. Bogner, “Outdoor moments: Do they help to foster cognitive and affective outcomes in biology lessons?” Journal of Biological Education, 49(4), 438–446. 2015.
    28. M. E. Eltahir, N. R. Alsalhi, S. Al-Qatawneh, H. A. AlQudah, & M. Jaradat, “The impact of game-based learning (GBL) on students' motivation, engagement and academic performance on an Arabic language grammar course in higher education.” Education and Information Technologies, 2021. 26, 3251–3278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10396-w.
    29. M. Liu, “Understanding student navigation patterns in game-based learning,” 2022. https://doi.org/10.3102/2007971.
    30. M. Nadeem, M. Oroszlanyova, and W. Farag, “Effect of digital game-based learning on student engagement and motivation,” Computers, vol. 12, no. 9, p. 177, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12090177.
    31. M. Padmanabha, P. Gupta, & M. Verma, “A game-based learning approach for enhancing student engagement and knowledge retention in higher education.” Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 30(4), 160–166. 2017.
    32. M. Sooegaard, “What is Gamification (GF)?,” Interaction Design Foundation, 2024. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/gamification.
    33. M. Wallace, “Gaming for the education of biology in high schools.” Encyclopedia, 4(2), 672–681. 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4020041.
    34. M. Yoshida, S. Kitaoka, N. Egawa, T. Aoi, K. Okita, T. Tadokoro, M. Saito, “Modeling the early phenotype at the neuromuscular junction of spinal muscular atrophy using patient-derived iPSCs.” Stem Cell Reports, 4(4), 561–568. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.02.010.
    35. OECD. PISA 2022 Results (Volume I & II): Country Notes – Philippines. OECD Publishing. 2023. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i-and-ii-country-notes_ed6fbcc5-en/philippines_a0882a2d-en.html.
    36. P. Buckley and E. Doyle, “Gamification and student motivation,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1162–1175, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.964263.
    37. P. S. Seow & C. H. Lee. Geneblock: A gamified biotechnology tool for undergraduate genetics education. Journal of Biological Education, 59(1), 12–24. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2024.2365671.
    38. P. Wouters and H. van Oostendorp, “Instructional techniques to facilitate learning in serious games: A meta-analysis,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 1217–1245, 2022.
    39. R. Chiotaki, S. Papadakis, & M. Kalogiannakis. Adaptive game-based learning environments in science education: A review of recent trends. Frontiers in Computer Science, 5, Article 1062350. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2023.1062350.
    40. R. E. Buschang, D. S. Kerr, and G. K. W. K. Chung, “Error analysis of a game-based mathematics assessment: Implications for learning and feedback,” 2019.
    41. R. Jones and P. Clark, “Meta-analysis of game-based learning in science education,” Int. J. Soc. Sci. Human Res., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 40–55, 2020.
    42. R. R. Hake, “Analyzing change/gain scores,” Division D, pp. 1–4, 1998.
    43. R. Situmorang, H. A. Siregar, & Manurung, B.. Learn biology using digital game-based learning: A systematic literature review. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(1), Article em2345. 2024. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14658.
    44. S. Deterding, D. Dixon, R. Khaled, & L. Nacke, “From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”.” In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9–15). 2011. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040.
    45. S. López-Jiménez, M. J. Galiano, J. A. Marín-Marín, J. M. S. Arribas, & M. Ruiz, “Gamification of the teaching-learning process in the subject of human genetics: Perception and acceptance by students.” Education Sciences, 11(9), 503. 2021.
    46. S. Singh, “Design and evaluation of a user-friendly interface for a digital game-based learning system.” International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 15(2), 1–10. 2023.
    47. T. Falciani, “Game-Based Learning: A Review of the Literature and Implications for Curriculum Design” (Publication No. 27836872) [Master's thesis, University of North Carolina Wilmington]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. 2020.
    48. V. Braun & V. Clarke, “Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806.
    49. V. Braun, & V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
    50. V. Labesig, “DepEd Rolls Out Game-Based Learning” The Post. 2022. Retrieved from: https://thepost.net.ph/news/nation/deped-rolls-out-game-based-learning/
    51. Y. Chou, Actionable Gamification: Beyond Points, Badges, and Leaderboards, Octalysis Media, 2015.
    52. Y.-T. Lin, C.-Y. Yang, C.-Y. Chang, and Y.-C. Yeh, “The effectiveness of animations versus static pictures in teaching genetics,” J. Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 152–164, 2018.
    53. Z. Zhang and J. Crawford, “EFL learners’ motivation in a gamified formative assessment: The case of Quizizz,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 6217–6239, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12034-7.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Aliling, J. K. M. ., Aquino, M. F. ., Arellano, J. A. ., & Zara, C. G. . (2025). Learning Mendelian Genetics Using A Game Based Learning Activities. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 14(7), 266-274. https://doi.org/10.14419/4s6nz990