Skip to content
IJBAS International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences E-ISSN 2227-5053

Discrete Modeling of Teacher Satisfaction and Well-Being Using TALIS Data: Latent Profiles, Gender Disparities, and Global Network Dynamics

Authors and Affiliations

About this article

Download PDF

Abstract

This study applies discrete mathematical modeling to examine patterns of teacher satisfaction and well-being using data from the 2018 Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS), which included 261,426 teachers across 48 education systems. Latent profile analysis based on nine indicators: self-efficacy, job satisfaction (overall, profession, and environment), emotional well-being, workload stress, disciplinary climate, professional engagement, and collaboration; identified three distinct profiles: High (34.2%), Moderate (45.6%), and Low (20.2%). Welch’s t-tests revealed significant gender disparities across most indicators, with female teachers reporting higher workload stress (M = 9.30 vs. 8.99, p < .001) and lower emotional well-being (M = 9.43 vs. 9.19, p < .001). Country-level ANOVA results indicated statistically significant differences across all nine measures (p < .001). Teachers in Finland, Japan, and South Korea reported higher levels of emotional well-being and professional satisfaction, while Brazil, Mexico, and the Czech Republic reported lower levels. A Gaussian graphical model was then constructed to explore interrelations among indicators. The network revealed strong partial correlations between job satisfaction and emotional well-being (r = 0.24), and between workload and emotional exhaustion (r = –0.21). Centrality analysis highlighted overall job satisfaction and emotional well-being as the most influential constructs, serving as key bridges and hubs of connectivity. These findings demonstrate the utility of combining latent profile classification with graph-theoretic modeling, providing a novel framework for analyzing large-scale teacher data through discrete mathematical procedures.

Keywords

  • Latent Profile Analysis
  • Network Analysis
  • Discrete Modeling
  • Gaussian Graphical Models
  • Centrality Measures
  • Teacher Well-Being
  • Educational Data Mining.

References

[1] Admiraal, W., & Røberg, K.-I. K. (2023). Teachers’ job demands, resources and their job satisfaction: Satisfaction with school, career choice and teaching profession of teachers in different career stages. Teaching and Teacher Education, 125, 104063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104063

[2] Ainley, J., & Carstens, R. (2018). Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018 conceptual framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/799337c2-en

[3] Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716-723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705

[4] Assaf, J., & Antoun, S. (2024). Impact of job satisfaction on teacher well-being and education quality. Pedagogical Research, 9(3), em0204. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14437

[5] Banerjee, N., Stearns, E., Moller, S., & Mickelson, R. A. (2017). Teacher job satisfaction and student achievement: The roles of teacher professional community and teacher collaboration in schools. American Journal of Education, 123(2), 203-241. https://doi.org/10.1086/689932

View more references (59)

[6] Bardach, L., Klassen, R. M., & Perry, N. E. (2022). Teachers’ psychological characteristics: Do They matter for teacher effectiveness, teachers’ well-being, retention, and interpersonal relations? An integrative review. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 259–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09614-9

[7] Bauer, D. J., & Shanahan, M. J. (2007). Modeling complex interactions: Person-centered and variable-centered approaches. In T. D. Little, J. A. Bovaird, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies (pp. 255-284). Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

[8] Bauer, J. (2022). A primer to latent profile and latent class analysis. In M. Goller, E. Kyndt, S. Paloniemi, & C. Damşa (Eds.), Methods for re-searching professional learning and development (Vol. 33, pp. 243–268). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08518-5_11

[9] Borsboom, D., & Cramer, A. O. J. (2013). Network analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annual Review of Clini-cal Psychology, 9, 91-121. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185608

[10] Carroll, A., Forrest, K., Sanders-O’Connor, E., Flynn, L., Bower, J. M., Fynes-Clinton, S., York, A., & Ziaei, M. (2022). Teacher stress and burnout in Australia: examining the role of intrapersonal and environmental factors. Social Psychology of Education, 25, 441–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09686-7

[11] Chen, J., & Chen, Z. (2008). Extended Bayesian information criteria for model selection with large model spaces. Biometrika, 95(3), 759-771. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asn034

[12] Clinciu, R.-A. (2023). Assessing the impact of professional development programs on employee performance in educational settings. Ovidius Uni-versity Annals, Economic Sciences Series, 23(1), 319-325.

[13] Collie, R. J., Malmberg, L.-E., Martin, A. J., Sammons, P., & Morin, A. J. S. (2020). A multilevel person-centered examination of teachers’ work-place demands and resources: Links with work-related well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 626. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00626

[14] Costantini, G., Richetin, J., Preti, E., Casini, E., Epskamp, S., & Perugini, M. (2019). Stability and variability of personality networks. A tutorial on recent developments in network psychometrics. Personality and Individual Differences, 136, 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.011

[15] Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 197-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555

[16] Dung, V., Trang, V. T., & Lan, N. T. M. (2024). Workload doesn’t mean exhaustion: Antecedents of teacher burnout. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 11(2), 404-412. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v11i2.5641

[17] Edara, I. R., del Castillo, F., Ching, G. S., & del Castillo, C. D. (2021). Religiosity and contentment among teachers in the Philippines during COVID-19 pandemic: Mediating effects of resilience, optimism, and well-being. Religions, 12(10), 879. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12100879

[18] Emeljanovas, A., Sabaliauskas, S., Mežienė, B., & Istomina, N. (2023). The relationships between teachers’ emotional health and stress coping. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1276431. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1276431

[19] Epskamp, S., Borsboom, D., & Fried, E. I. (2018). Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 195–212. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1

[20] Epskamp, S., Cramer, A. O. J., Waldorp, L. J., Schmittmann, V. D., & Borsboom, D. (2012). qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(4), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i04

[21] Epskamp, S., Waldorp, L. J., Mõttus, R., & Borsboom, D. (2018). The Gaussian Graphical Model in cross-sectional and time-series data. Multivari-ate Behavioral Research, 53(4), 453-480. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1454823

[22] Eryilmaz, N., Kennedy, A. I., Strietholt, R., & Johansson, S. (2025). Teacher job satisfaction: International evidence on the role of school working conditions and teacher characteristics. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 86, 101474. https://doi.org/j.stueduc.2025.101474

[23] Estrada, E. (2019). Degree heterogeneity of graphs and networks. I. Interpretation and the “heterogeneity paradox”. Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, 22(4), 503-529. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720502.2019.1643553

[24] Foody, G. M., Campbell, N. A., Trodd, N. M., & Wood, T. F. (1992). Derivation and applications of probabilistic measures of class membership from the maximum-likelihood classification. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 58(9), 1335-1341.

[25] Frady, G. M. (2019). Mid-career teacher professional growth as impacted by the principal/teacher relationship: A phenomenological study [Disserta-tion, California State University]. Fullerton, California.

[26] Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7

[27] Fried, E. I., van Borkulo, C. D., Cramer, A. O. J., Boschloo, L., Schoevers, R. A., & Borsboom, D. (2017). Mental disorders as networks of prob-lems: A review of recent insights. In Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (Vol. 52, pp. 1-10). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-016-1319-z

[28] Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2008). Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics, 9(3), 432-441. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxm045

[29] Froehlich, M. (2024). Reignited educator: Rediscovering emotional engagement and purpose in your profession. Solution Tree Press.

[30] Gadermann, A. M., Petteni, M. G., Molyneux, T. M., Warren, M. T., Thomson, K. C., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., Guhn, M., & Oberle, E. (2023). Teacher mental health and workplace well-being in a global crisis: Learning from the challenges and supports identified by teachers one year into the COVID-19 pandemic in British Columbia, Canada. PLOS One, 18(8), e0290230. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290230

[31] Gimbert, B. G., & Kapa, R. R. (2022). Mid-career teacher retention: Who intends to stay, where, and why? Journal of Education Human Resources, 40(2), 228–265. https://doi.org/10.3138/jehr-2020-0037

[32] Hoque, K. E., Wang, X., Qi, Y., & Norzan, N. (2023). The factors associated with teachers’ job satisfaction and their impacts on students’ achievement: A review (2010–2021). Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 177. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01645-7

[33] Jusoh, R., & Zhenni, Z. (2025). Personnel management strategies and welfare policies for enhancing teachers work-life balance and well being. In-terciencia, 261(3). https://doi.org/10.59671/QxJHe

[34] Kemling-Horner, W. (2021). Organizational supports and school climate [Dissertation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln]. Lincoln, Nebraska.

[35] Leeper, T. J. (2024). Interpreting regression results using average marginal effects with R’s margins. Comprehensive R Archive Network. https://cran.hafro.is/web/packages/margins/vignettes/TechnicalDetails.pdf

[36] Li, C. (2021). School climate, teacher self-efficacy, and teaching practices: Evidence from TALIS 2018 [Dissertation, University of Nevada]. Las Vegas, Nevada.

[37] Lin, C.-C., Huang, W., Liu, W.-Y., & Wu, S.-F. (2019). A novel centrality-based method for visual analytics of small-world networks. Journal of Visualization, 22, 973–990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-019-00582-5

[38] Ma, X., & Marion, R. (2024). How does leadership affect teacher collaboration? Evidence from teachers in US schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 35(2), 116-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2024.2330533

[39] Marchetti, G. M. (2006). Independencies induced from a graphical Markov model after marginalization and conditioning: The R package ggm. Journal of Statistical Software, 15(6), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v015.i06

[40] McLachlan, G. J., Lee, S. X., & Rathnayake, S. I. (2019). Finite mixture models. Annual Review of Statistics and its Application, 6, 355-378. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-031017-100325

[41] Mishra, P., Singh, U., Pandey, C. M., Mishra, P., & Pandey, G. (2019). Application of Student's t-test, analysis of variance, and covariance. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 22(4), 407-411. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_94_19

[42] Nayak, S. R., Arora, V., Sinha, U., & Poonia, R. C. (2021). A statistical analysis of COVID-19 using Gaussian and probabilistic model. Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, 24(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720502.2020.1833442

[43] Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535-569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396

[44] O’Brennan, L. M., Bradshaw, C. P., & Furlong, M. J. (2014). Influence of classroom and school climate on teacher perceptions of student problem behavior. School Mental Health, 6, 125-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-014-9118-8

[45] Oberg, G., Macmahon, S., & Carroll, A. (2025). Assessing the interplay: teacher efficacy, compassion fatigue, and educator well-being in Australia. The Australian Educational Researcher, 52, 1105-1131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-024-00755-8

[46] Oberski, D. (2016). Mixture models: Latent profile and latent class analysis. In J. Robertson & M. Kaptein (Eds.), Modern statistical methods for HCI (pp. 275–287). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26633-6_12

[47] OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 results (Volume I): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en

[48] Opsahl, T., Agneessens, F., & Skvoretz, J. (2010). Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Social Networks, 32(3), 245-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.006

[49] Ortan, F., Simut, C., & Simut, R. (2021). Self-efficacy, job satisfaction and teacher well-being in the K-12 educational system. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(23), 12763. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312763

[50] R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. In (Version Version 4.3.0) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

[51] Reisman, E., Radel, M., Clark, S., & Buck, H. (2022). Grad school in the rear view: prioritizing career skills, mentorship, and equity in the interdis-ciplinary environmental PhD. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 12, 890–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-022-00790-w

[52] Robinaugh, D. J., Millner, A. J., & McNally, R. J. (2016). Identifying highly influential nodes in the complicated grief network. Journal of Abnor-mal Psychology, 125(6), 747–757. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000181

[53] Rosenberg, J. M., Beymer, P. N., Anderson, D. J., van Lissa, C. J., & Schmidt, J. A. (2019). tidyLPA: An R package to easily carry out Latent Pro-file Analysis (LPA) using open-source or commercial software. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(30), 978. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00978

[54] Scheres, S. H. W. (2010). Classification of structural heterogeneity by maximum-likelihood methods. Methods in Enzymology, 482, 295-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(10)82012-9

[55] Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461-464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136

[56] Spurk, D., Hirschi, A., Wang, M., Valero, D., & Kauffeld, S. (2020). Latent profile analysis: A review and “how to” guide of its application within vocational behavior research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 120, 103445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445

[57] Symeonidis, V., Guberman, A., & Cooper, R. (2025). Addressing teacher shortages in an international context: Implications for the quality and sta-tus of teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 48(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2025.2447968

[58] Welch, B. L. (1947). The generalization of `Student's' problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika, 34(1/2), 28-35. https://doi.org/10.2307/2332510

[59] Xu, Z., Weng, W., Hu, X., & Luo, W. (2025). Comparative analysis of collaborative impacts on teacher job satisfaction: A cross-cultural study be-tween the United States and China. Research in Comparative and International Education, 20(1), 145-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/17454999251313599

[60] Yang, Q., & Hoque, K. E. (2023). Job satisfaction of university teachers: A systematic literature review (2010-2021). Journal of University Teach-ing and Learning Practice, 20(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.01.12

[61] Yu, D., Chen, J., Li, X., & Yan, Z. (2022). Trajectory of teacher well-being research between 1973 and 2021: Review evidence from 49 years in Asia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12342. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912342

[62] Zhang, X., Guo, J., Ma, L., Xu, R., Wang, J., Yang, Y., & Shen, H. (2023). Teacher stress among public primary and secondary schoolteachers in Datong, a city of Shanxi Province, China: association between teacher stress and standardized workload. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 36(2), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01948

[63] Zhou, H., Xu, S. Q., Chung, D.-H., & Dang, D. X. (2025). Job satisfaction mediates the effect of self-efficacy on work engagement among physi-cal education teachers in economically disadvantaged areas. PLOS One, 20(4), e0321055. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321055

[64] Zhou, S., Slemp, G. R., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2024). Factors associated with teacher wellbeing: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Re-view, 36, 63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09886-x


How to Cite

Edara, I. R., del Castillo, F., Chao, P.-C., del Castillo, C. D., & Ching, G. S. (2025). Discrete Modeling of Teacher Satisfaction and Well-Being Using TALIS Data: Latent Profiles, Gender Disparities, and Global Network Dynamics. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 14(6), 413-424. https://doi.org/10.14419/kzyp8b13