Machine Learning Approaches for Credit Card Fraud Detection‎in Severely Imbalanced Datasets: A Comparative Analysisof ‎Classification and Anomaly Detection Methods

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sezai Ph. D. MBA Tunca Faculty of Economics, Administrative, and Social Sciences, Alanya University, 07400, Alanya, Antalya, Turkiye
  • Yavuz Selim Ph. D. Balcioglu Management Information System Department, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Dogus University, 34775, Dudullu, ‎Istanbul, Turkiye
  • Ceren Cubukcu Ph. D. Cerasi Management Information System Department, Faculty of Business, Gebze Technical University, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkiye
  • Umit Ph. Dc.‎ Bayraktar Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Business, Gebze Technical University, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkiye

About this article

Download PDF

Keywords:

Credit Card Fraud Detection; Machine Learning; Class Imbalance; Feature Importance; Threshold Optimization

Abstract

Credit card fraud presents a persistent threat to financial institutions, exacerbated by the rise of digital payments and the complexity of ‎fraudulent schemes. This study investigates machine learning (ML) approaches for fraud detection in severely imbalanced datasets, focusing ‎on three key objectives: comparing classification and anomaly detection models under extreme class imbalance, identifying transaction ‎features with the highest discriminative power, and optimizing decision thresholds using cost-sensitive evaluation to minimize business ‎impact. Utilizing a dataset of 999 transactions with a fraud rate of 0.2% (498.5:1 imbalance), we implemented supervised methods (logistic ‎regression, random forest, gradient boosting) and unsupervised anomaly detection (Isolation Forest, One-Class SVM, Local Outlier ‎Factor). Results show that ensemble-based models, particularly Gradient Boosting, achieved superior performance (AUC-ROC = 0.956; ‎AUC-PR = 0.378) with perfect recall and improved precision relative to other methods. Feature analysis identified anonymized PCA-‎derived variables (V14, V10, V12) as the most discriminative indicators of fraudulent activity. Threshold optimization at 0.9 minimized ‎operational costs ($2,985) while maintaining full recall, yielding an estimated annual net benefit of $68,985 and a return on investment of ‎‎186.7%. This study contributes to the literature by integrating algorithm benchmarking, feature importance evaluation, and cost-sensitive ‎threshold optimization in an end-to-end fraud detection framework. The findings underscore the importance of ensemble learning, ‎imbalanced evaluation metrics (AUC-PR, precision, recall), and business-driven threshold calibration for developing effective and ‎economically viable fraud prevention systems. Future research should explore larger datasets, adaptive learning to address concept drift, and ‎explainable AI techniques to enhance interpretability and regulatory compliance‎.

References

Alfaiz, A., & Fati, S. M. (2022). Handling class imbalance in credit card fraud detection: Comparative study of resampling techniques and cost-sensitive learning. Journal of Financial Crime Analytics, 14(2), 115–132.

Breskuvienė, J., & Dzemyda, G. (2024). Emerging challenges of credit card fraud detection in digital finance. International Journal of Information Security and Privacy, 19(1), 45–63.

Darwish, H., Elsayad, A., & Rizk, R. (2025). Class imbalance in fraud detection: Deep learning and resampling strategies. Expert Systems with Applications, 235, 121201.

Fariha, M., Ahmed, S., & Chowdhury, R. (2025). AI-driven fraud detection in the era of digital payments: Trends and challenges. Computers & Security, 138, 103599.

Höppner, S., Maier, M., & Ziegler, S. (2020). Adaptive machine learning frameworks for real-time fraud detection in financial systems. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 31(12), 5229–5242. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3045307.

View more references (6)

Majumder, A. (2025). Advancing fraud detection: Concept drift and adaptive machine learning in financial transaction monitoring. Decision Support Systems, 178, 114048.

Showalter, M., & Wu, D. (2019). Automated fraud detection: A machine learning approach. Journal of Banking and Financial Technology, 3(2), 87–102.

Verma, P., & Dhar, V. (2024). Concept drift-aware fraud detection models: Challenges and future directions. Information Systems Frontiers, 26(3), 741–757.

Xia, Y., & Saha, R. (2025). Gradient boosting and ensemble learning for imbalanced credit card fraud detection. Applied Intelligence, 55(4), 928–944.

Yazıcı, M. (2020). Class imbalance in machine learning: Implications for financial fraud detection. Journal of Financial Data Science, 2(4), 65–79.

Zarzà, S., Gómez, J., & Lozano, A. (2023). Hybrid anomaly detection and classification methods for fraud prevention in financial transactions. Expert Systems with Applications, 220, 119676.


How to Cite

Tunca, S. P. D. M. ., Balcioglu, Y. S. P. D. ., Cerasi, C. C. P. D. ., & Bayraktar, U. P. D. . (2025). Machine Learning Approaches for Credit Card Fraud Detection‎in Severely Imbalanced Datasets: A Comparative Analysisof ‎Classification and Anomaly Detection Methods. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 14(5), 593-602. https://doi.org/10.14419/m6x6fn74