Content Subtle Style Generative Adversarial Network with Multitask Efficient NetB7 to Predict Embryo Ploidy Status for Effective IVF Outcomes

  • Authors

    • S. Divya Department of Computer Science, PSG College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore-641014, Tamil Nadu, India
    • S. Geetharani Department of Computer Technology, PSG College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore-641014, Tamil Nadu, India
    https://doi.org/10.14419/t62an110

    Received date: July 15, 2025

    Accepted date: August 22, 2025

    Published date: September 17, 2025

  • EfficientNetB7, Embryo ploidy prediction, IVF, Mask-RCNN, Non-invasive, PGT, StyleGAN
  • Abstract

    Usually, the assisted reproductive units prevent multiple pregnancies by transferring a single embryo. Experts should choose an embryo to transplant from a unit created by the intended parents. This selection technique must be precise, non-intrusive, reliable, and accessible to In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF) facilities globally. However, the key challenge is determining embryo ploidy status and choosing the most viable embryos for successful transfer. To address this issue, embryo genetic status is assessed via Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A), which entails embryo biopsy and genetic testing. However, it is invasive and costly. As a result, non-invasive techniques using Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) models are created to estimate embryo ploidy status from time-lapse embryo photos, allowing for decision-making before further treatment. Conversely, these models frequently rely on low-quality and insufficient numbers of embryo images as well as a lack of clinical and demographic information about the patient, such as age, pelvic factor, sperm count, etc., resulting in decreased accuracy. For augmenting embryo images, Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) and its variant called Style-based GAN (StyleGAN) were applied; yet, they were restricted to producing images with low resolutions, leading to poor image quality. Hence, this article develops a novel Content Subtle Style-based GAN (CSSGAN) with a Multi-model EfficientNetB7 (MENB7) model to augment time-lapse embryo images and predict ploidy status for effective IVF outcomes. The CSSGAN adopts content-aware channel pruning and content-sensitive distillation approaches as minimax optimization tasks to generate a massive quantity of high-quality and high-fidelity human embryo images at the blastocyst stage. The generated images are input into the Mask-Residual Convolutional Neural Network (Mask-RCNN) for segmentation. Then, the relevant features from the segmented images are captured by EfficientNetB7, which fuses them with the patient’s clinical and demographic data to create a unified feature vector. Moreover, a Fully Connected (FC) layer with softmax is used for predicting euploid and aneuploid embryos. Finally, extensive experiments using distinct datasets illustrate the efficiency of the CSSGAN-MENB7 model in predicting embryo ploidy status with 95.88% accuracy compared to the conventional DL models.

  • References

    1. D.K. Gardner, D. Sakkas, Making and selecting the best embryo in the laboratory, Fertility and Sterility, 120(3) (2023) 457-466, available online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.11.007
    2. V. Lacconi, M. Massimiani, I. Carriero, et al., When the embryo meets the endometrium: identifying the features required for successful embryo implantation, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(5) (2024) 2834, available online: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25052834
    3. A. Yazdani, I. Halvaei, C. Boniface, N. Esfandiari, Effect of cytoplasmic fragmentation on embryo development, quality, and pregnancy outcome: a systematic review of the literature, Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 22(1) (2024) 55, available online: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-024-01217-7
    4. J. Wang, Y. Guo, N. Zhang, T. Li, Research progress of time-lapse imaging technology and embryonic development potential: a review, Medicine, 102(38) (2023) e35203, available online: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035203
    5. K. Tvrdonova, S. Belaskova, T. Rumpikova, et al., Differences in morphokinetic parameters and incidence of multinucleations in human embryos of genetically normal, abnormal and euploid embryos leading to clinical pregnancy, Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(21) (2021) 5173, available online: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215173
    6. C. Morales, Current applications and controversies in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) in in vitro fertilization, Reproductive Sciences, 31(1) (2024) 66-80, available online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-023-01301-0
    7. O.S. Davis, L.A. Favetta, S. Deniz, et al., Potential costs and benefits of incorporating PGT-A across age groups: a Canadian clinic perspective, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 46(5) (2024) 102361, available online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102361
    8. A. Von Schondorf-Gleicher, L. Mochizuki, R. Orvieto, P. Patrizio, A.S. Caplan, N. Gleicher, Revisiting selected ethical aspects of current clinical in vitro fertilization (IVF) practice, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 39(3) (2022) 591-604, available online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02439-7
    9. Z.J. Pavlovic, G.E. Smotrich, E.P. New, et al., Fresh vs. frozen: pregnancy outcomes and treatment efficacy between fresh embryo transfer vs. un-tested freeze-all cycles, F&S Reports, 5(4) (2024) 369-377, available online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xfre.2024.09.003
    10. E. Moustakli, A. Zikopoulos, C. Skentou, I. Bouba, K. Dafopoulos, I. Georgiou, Evolution of minimally invasive and non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing: an overview, Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(8) (2024) 2160, available online:
    11. A. del Arco de la Paz, C. Giménez-Rodríguez, A. Selntigia, M. Meseguer, D. Galliano, Advancements and challenges in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies: in the pathway to non-invasive techniques, Genes, 15(12) (2024) 1613, available online: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082160
    12. A. De Vos, N. De Munck, Trophectoderm biopsy: present state of the art, Genes, 16(2) (2025) 134, available online: https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16020134
    13. A. Sethi, N. Singh, R. Gupta, et al., P-725 role of non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing-aneuploidy (NIPGT-A) using spent culture media (SCM) and its concordance with Trophoectoderm (TE) biopsy: a prospective cohort study, Human Reproduction, 38(Supplement_1) (2023) dead093-1045, available online: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dead093.1045
    14. R. Nuñez-Calonge, N. Santamaria, T. Rubio, J.M. Moreno, Making and selecting the best embryo in in vitro fertilization, Archives of Medical Re-search, 55(8) (2024) 103068, available online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2024.103068
    15. M. Salih, C. Austin, R.R. Warty, et al., Embryo selection through artificial intelligence versus embryologists: a systematic review, Human Repro-duction Open, 2023(3) (2023) hoad031, available online: https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoad031
    16. Â. Ribeiro, A. Gomes, R. Magalhães, J. Amaral, J.S. Carvalho, Implementing artificial intelligence in the embryology laboratory: a methodological approach, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 48 (2024) 104036, available online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104036
    17. K. Si, B. Huang, L. Jin, Application of artificial intelligence in gametes and embryos selection, Human Fertility, 26(4) (2023) 757-777, available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2023.2256980
    18. V.S. Jiang, C.L. Bormann, Artificial intelligence in the in vitro fertilization laboratory: a review of advancements over the last decade, Fertility and Sterility, 120(1) (2023) 17-23, available online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.05.149
    19. V.S. Jiang, H. Kandula, P. Thirumalaraju, et al., The use of voting ensembles to improve the accuracy of deep neural networks as a non-invasive method to predict embryo ploidy status, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 40(2) (2023) 301-308, available online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02707-6
    20. L. Sun, J. Li, S. Zeng, et al., Artificial intelligence system for outcome evaluations of human in vitro fertilization-derived embryos, Chinese Medical Journal, 137(16) (2024) 1939-1949, available online: https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000003162
    21. R. He, V. Sarwal, X. Qiu, et al., Generative AI models in time-varying biomedical data: scoping review, Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27 (2025) e59792, available online: https://doi.org/10.2196/59792
    22. D. Dirvanauskas, R. Maskeliūnas, V. Raudonis, R. Damaševičius, R. Scherer, Hemigen: human embryo image generator based on generative adver-sarial networks, Sensors, 19(16) (2019) 3578, available online: https://doi.org/10.3390/s19163578
    23. P. Cao, J. Derhaag, E. Coonen, et al., Generative artificial intelligence to produce high-fidelity blastocyst-stage embryo images, Human Reproduc-tion, 39(6) (2024) 1197-1207, available online: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deae064
    24. C.I. Lee, Y.R. Su, C.H. Chen, et al., End-to-end deep learning for recognition of ploidy status using time-lapse videos, Journal of Assisted Repro-duction and Genetics, 38(7) (2021) 1655-1663, available online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02228-8
    25. P. Thirumalaraju, M.K. Kanakasabapathy, C.L. Bormann, et al., Evaluation of deep convolutional neural networks in classifying human embryo im-ages based on their morphological quality, Heliyon, 7(2) (2021) e06298, available online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06298
    26. B. Huang, W. Tan, Z. Li, L. Jin, An artificial intelligence model (euploid prediction algorithm) can predict embryo ploidy status based on time-lapse data, Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 19 (2021) 1-10, available online: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00864-4
    27. S.M. Diakiw, J.M.M. Hall, M.D. VerMilyea, et al., Development of an artificial intelligence model for predicting the likelihood of human embryo euploidy based on blastocyst images from multiple imaging systems during IVF, Human Reproduction, 37(8) (2022) 1746-1759, available online: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deac131
    28. S. De Gheselle, C. Jacques, J. Chambost, et al., Machine learning for prediction of euploidy in human embryos: in search of the best-performing model and predictive features, Fertility and Sterility, 117(4) (2022) 738-746, available online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.11.029
    29. G.B. Danardono, N. Handayani, C.M. Louis, et al., Embryo ploidy status classification through computer-assisted morphology assessment, AJOG Global Reports, 3(3) (2023) 100209, available online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100209
    30. J. Barnes, M. Brendel, V.R. Gao, et al., A non-invasive artificial intelligence approach for the prediction of human blastocyst ploidy: a retrospective model development and validation study, The Lancet Digital Health, 5(1) (2023) e28-e40, available online: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00213-8
    31. E. Paya, C. Pulgarín, L. Bori, A. Colomer, V. Naranjo, M. Meseguer, Deep learning system for classification of ploidy status using time-lapse vide-os, F&S Science, 4(3) (2023) 211-218, available online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xfss.2023.06.002
    32. K. Kalyani, P.S. Deshpande, A deep learning model for predicting blastocyst formation from cleavage-stage human embryos using time-lapse imag-es, Scientific Reports, 14(1) (2024) 28019, available online: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-79175-8
    33. B.X. Ma, G.N. Zhao, Z.F. Yi, Y.L. Yang, L. Jin, B. Huang, Enhancing clinical utility: deep learning-based embryo scoring model for non-invasive aneuploidy prediction, Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 22(1) (2024) 58, available online: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-024-01230-w
    34. S. Rajendran, M. Brendel, J. Barnes, et al., Automatic ploidy prediction and quality assessment of human blastocysts using time-lapse imaging, Na-ture Communications, 15(1) (2024) 7756, available online: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51823-7
    35. N. Handayani, G.B. Danardono, A. Boediono, et al., Improving deep learning-based algorithm for ploidy status prediction through combined U-NET blastocyst segmentation and sequential time-lapse blastocysts images, Journal of Reproduction & Infertility, 25(2) (2024) 110, available online: https://doi.org/10.18502/jri.v25i2.16006
    36. T. Gomez, M. Feyeux, J. Boulant, et al., A time-lapse embryo dataset for morphokinetic parameter prediction, Data in Brief, 42 (2022) 108258, available online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2022.108258.
  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Divya , S. ., & Geetharani , S. . (2025). Content Subtle Style Generative Adversarial Network with Multitask Efficient NetB7 to Predict Embryo Ploidy Status for Effective IVF Outcomes. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 14(5), 625-638. https://doi.org/10.14419/t62an110