Analysis of DL-Algorithms for Segmentation of Tumor
-
https://doi.org/10.14419/2d97nf77
Received date: June 26, 2025
Accepted date: July 2, 2025
Published date: July 18, 2025
-
Brain; Tumor; MRI; Segmentation -
Abstract
Precisely identifying brain tumors in MRI images is essential for medical image analysis, as it significantly aids in diagnosis, therapy planning, and tracking disease progression. Despite the rapid advancement of Deep learning methods, especially neural networks, which have added prominence for their effectiveness in image-related tasks, a systematic comparative analysis of leading DL architectures using the Figshare BTMR dataset is still lacking. This study addresses this gap by experimentally evaluating six prominent DL models—VGG16, VGG19, ResNet18, ResNet50, MobileNet, and Xception—used as backbone encoders for brain tumor segmentation. Each model’s performance is objectively measured using“metrics such as Mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) and Mean Dice Similarity Coefficient”(mDSC). The findings provide valuable insights into the balance between segmentation accuracy and efficiency, assisting in the selection of suitable models for real-time and clinical implementation. This work serves as a benchmark reference, guiding future efforts in selecting effective DL-based architectures for brain tumor segmentation tasks.
-
References
- Gupta RK, Bharti S, Kunhare N, Sahu Y, Pathik N. Brain Tumor Detection and Classification Using Cycle Generative Adversarial Networks. In-terdiscip Sci [Internet]. 2022;14(2):485–502. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12539-022-00502-6.
- Jaglan P, Dass R, Duhan M. Escalate the efficacy of breast tumor detection through magnetic resonance imaging: a framework. International Jour-nal of Information Technology (Singapore) [Internet]. 2020 Sep 1 [cited 2023 Sep 18];12(3):879–87. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41870-019-00393-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-019-00393-9.
- Yasaka K, Akai H, Kunimatsu A, Kiryu S, Abe O. Deep learning with a convolutional neural network in radiology. Jpn J Radiol [Internet]. 2018 Apr 1 [cited 2024 Jan 11];36(4):257–72. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11604-018-0726-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-018-0726-3.
- Özcan H, Emiroğlu BG, Sabuncuoğlu H, Özdoğan S, Soyer A, Saygı T, et al. A comparative study for glioma classification using deep convolu-tional neural networks. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering 2021 2:1550 [Internet]. 2021 Jan 1 [cited 2024 Jan 11];18(2):1550–72. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2021080.
- Yasaka K, Akai H, Kunimatsu A, Kiryu S, Abe O. Deep learning with convolutional neural network in radiology. Jpn J Radiol [Internet]. 2018 Apr 1 [cited 2024 Jan 11];36(4):257–72. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11604-018-0726-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-018-0726-3.
- Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. 2015-U-Net. ArXiv [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2025 Jul 1];1–8. Available from: http://lmb.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/%0Aarxiv:1505.04597v1.
- Isensee F, Jaeger PF, Kohl SAA, Petersen J, Maier-Hein KH. nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image seg-mentation. Nat Methods [Internet]. 2021 Feb 1 [cited 2025 Jul 1];18(2):203–11. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-020-01008-z. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-01008-z.
- Maji D, Sigedar P, Singh M. Attention Res-UNet with Guided Decoder for semantic segmentation of brain tumors. Biomed Signal Process Control [Internet]. 2022 Jan 1 [cited 2025 Jul 1]; 71:103077. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1746809421006741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103077.
- Sun J, Li J, Liu L. Semantic segmentation of brain tumor with nested residual attention networks. Multimed Tools Appl [Internet]. 2021 Nov 1 [cit-ed 2025 Jul 1];80(26–27):34203–20. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11042-020-09840-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09840-3.
- Hatamizadeh A, Nath V, Tang Y, Yang D, Roth HR, Xu D. Swin UNETR: Swin Transformers for Semantic Segmentation of Brain Tumors in MRI Images. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) [Internet]. 2022 Jan 4 [cited 2025 Jul 1];12962 LNCS:272–84. Available from: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2201.01266. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08999-2_22.
- Xu Y, Yu K, Qi G, Gong Y, Qu X, Yin L, et al. Brain tumour segmentation framework with deep nuanced reasoning and Swin-T. IET Image Pro-cess [Internet]. 2024 May 11 [cited 2025 Jul 1];18(6):1550–64. https://doi.org/10.1049/ipr2.13048.
- Farhan AS, Khalid M, Manzoor U. XAI-MRI: an ensemble dual-modality approach for 3D brain tumor segmentation using magnetic resonance im-aging. Front ArtifIntell [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Jul 1];8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40046502/. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1525240.
- Peivandi M, Zhang J, Lu M, Zhu D, Kou Z. Empirical Evaluation of the Segment Anything Model (SAM) for Brain Tumor Segmentation. 2023 Oct 9 [cited 2025 Jul 1]; Available from: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.06162.
- brain tumor dataset [Internet]. [cited 2025 May 27]. Available from: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/brain_tumor_dataset/1512427.
- Abidin ZU, Naqvi RA, Haider A, Kim HS, Jeong D, Lee SW. Recent deep learning-based brain tumor segmentation models using multi-modality magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective survey. Front BioengBiotechnol. 2024 Jul 22; 12:1392807. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1392807.
-
Downloads
-
How to Cite
Sarita, & Dass , R. . (2025). Analysis of DL-Algorithms for Segmentation of Tumor. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 14(3), 143-149. https://doi.org/10.14419/2d97nf77