Analysis of DL-Algorithms for Segmentation of Tumor

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarita Department of ECE, DCRUST, Murthal, Sonipat(Haryana), India
  • Rajeshwar Dass Department of ECE, DCRUST, Murthal, Sonipat(Haryana), India

About this article

Download PDF

Keywords:

Brain; Tumor; MRI; Segmentation

Abstract

Precisely identifying brain tumors in MRI images is essential for medical image analysis, as it significantly aids ‎in diagnosis, therapy planning, and tracking disease progression. Despite the rapid advancement of Deep ‎learning methods, especially neural networks, which have added prominence for their effectiveness in image-related tasks, a systematic comparative analysis of leading DL architectures using the Figshare BTMR dataset ‎is still lacking. This study addresses this gap by experimentally evaluating six prominent DL models—VGG16, ‎VGG19, ResNet18, ResNet50, MobileNet, and Xception—used as backbone encoders for brain tumor ‎segmentation. Each model’s performance is objectively measured using“metrics such as Mean Intersection ‎over Union (mIoU) and Mean Dice Similarity Coefficient”(mDSC). The findings provide valuable insights into ‎the balance between segmentation accuracy and efficiency, assisting in the selection of suitable models for real-time and clinical implementation. This work serves as a benchmark reference, guiding future efforts in selecting ‎effective DL-based architectures for brain tumor segmentation tasks‎.

References

Gupta RK, Bharti S, Kunhare N, Sahu Y, Pathik N. Brain Tumor Detection and Classification Using Cycle Generative Adversarial Networks. In-terdiscip Sci [Internet]. 2022;14(2):485–502. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12539-022-00502-6.

Jaglan P, Dass R, Duhan M. Escalate the efficacy of breast tumor detection through magnetic resonance imaging: a framework. International Jour-nal of Information Technology (Singapore) [Internet]. 2020 Sep 1 [cited 2023 Sep 18];12(3):879–87. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41870-019-00393-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-019-00393-9.

Yasaka K, Akai H, Kunimatsu A, Kiryu S, Abe O. Deep learning with a convolutional neural network in radiology. Jpn J Radiol [Internet]. 2018 Apr 1 [cited 2024 Jan 11];36(4):257–72. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11604-018-0726-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-018-0726-3.

Özcan H, Emiroğlu BG, Sabuncuoğlu H, Özdoğan S, Soyer A, Saygı T, et al. A comparative study for glioma classification using deep convolu-tional neural networks. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering 2021 2:1550 [Internet]. 2021 Jan 1 [cited 2024 Jan 11];18(2):1550–72. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2021080.

Yasaka K, Akai H, Kunimatsu A, Kiryu S, Abe O. Deep learning with convolutional neural network in radiology. Jpn J Radiol [Internet]. 2018 Apr 1 [cited 2024 Jan 11];36(4):257–72. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11604-018-0726-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-018-0726-3.

View more references (10)

Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. 2015-U-Net. ArXiv [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2025 Jul 1];1–8. Available from: http://lmb.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/%0Aarxiv:1505.04597v1.

Isensee F, Jaeger PF, Kohl SAA, Petersen J, Maier-Hein KH. nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image seg-mentation. Nat Methods [Internet]. 2021 Feb 1 [cited 2025 Jul 1];18(2):203–11. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-020-01008-z. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-01008-z.

Maji D, Sigedar P, Singh M. Attention Res-UNet with Guided Decoder for semantic segmentation of brain tumors. Biomed Signal Process Control [Internet]. 2022 Jan 1 [cited 2025 Jul 1]; 71:103077. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1746809421006741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103077.

Sun J, Li J, Liu L. Semantic segmentation of brain tumor with nested residual attention networks. Multimed Tools Appl [Internet]. 2021 Nov 1 [cit-ed 2025 Jul 1];80(26–27):34203–20. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11042-020-09840-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09840-3.

Hatamizadeh A, Nath V, Tang Y, Yang D, Roth HR, Xu D. Swin UNETR: Swin Transformers for Semantic Segmentation of Brain Tumors in MRI Images. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) [Internet]. 2022 Jan 4 [cited 2025 Jul 1];12962 LNCS:272–84. Available from: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2201.01266. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08999-2_22.

Xu Y, Yu K, Qi G, Gong Y, Qu X, Yin L, et al. Brain tumour segmentation framework with deep nuanced reasoning and Swin-T. IET Image Pro-cess [Internet]. 2024 May 11 [cited 2025 Jul 1];18(6):1550–64. https://doi.org/10.1049/ipr2.13048.

Farhan AS, Khalid M, Manzoor U. XAI-MRI: an ensemble dual-modality approach for 3D brain tumor segmentation using magnetic resonance im-aging. Front ArtifIntell [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Jul 1];8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40046502/. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1525240.

Peivandi M, Zhang J, Lu M, Zhu D, Kou Z. Empirical Evaluation of the Segment Anything Model (SAM) for Brain Tumor Segmentation. 2023 Oct 9 [cited 2025 Jul 1]; Available from: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.06162.

brain tumor dataset [Internet]. [cited 2025 May 27]. Available from: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/brain_tumor_dataset/1512427.

Abidin ZU, Naqvi RA, Haider A, Kim HS, Jeong D, Lee SW. Recent deep learning-based brain tumor segmentation models using multi-modality magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective survey. Front BioengBiotechnol. 2024 Jul 22; 12:1392807. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1392807.


How to Cite

Sarita, & Dass , R. . (2025). Analysis of DL-Algorithms for Segmentation of Tumor. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 14(3), 143-149. https://doi.org/10.14419/2d97nf77