A Comparative Study of Computing Paradigms for Real-TimeImage Processing: Cloud, Edge, And On-Device AI
-
https://doi.org/10.14419/cbjvn374
Received date: June 16, 2025
Accepted date: June 23, 2025
Published date: July 27, 2025
-
Cloud Computing; Edge Computing; AI-Based On-Device Edge Computing; Real-Time Processing; Data Analysis -
Abstract
With the growing demand for real-time image and video processing, selecting an efficient computing architecture has become increasingly important. This study conducts a comparative analysis of three paradigms—cloud computing (CC), edge computing (EC), and on-device edge computing (ODEC)—to determine the most suitable method for real-time applications. By evaluating their performance across varying data volumes and network conditions, we identify the trade-offs in latency, scalability, and responsiveness. The findings reveal that cloud computing suffers from increased latency due to transmission bottlenecks, while edge and on-device computing significantly reduce latency through decentralized processing. Among the three, ODEC demonstrates the most consistent performance, particularly in environments requiring large-scale data handling and minimal network dependence. These results suggest that on-device AI offers a promising direction for future real-time systems by addressing the limitations of traditional architectures.
-
References
- Fernandes, V.; Carvalho, G.; Pereira, V.; Bernardino, J. Analyzing Data Reduction Techniques: An Experimental Perspective. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 3436. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14083436.
- Siddiqui, S.T.; Khan, M.R.; Khan, Z.; Rana, N.; Khan, H.; Alam, M.I. Significance of Internet-of-Things Edge and Fog Computingin Edu-cation Sector. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Smart Computing and Application (ICSCA), Hail,Saudi Arabia, 5–6 February 2023; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA; pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSCA57840.2023.10087582.
- Lee, H.; Kim, J.; Park, S. Edge AI vs. Cloud AI: A Comparative Study of Performance, Latency, and Scalability. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 1289.
- Nasir Abbas at al “Mobile Edge Computing: A Survey” IEEE internet of Things Journal, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 450-465, Sep 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2017.2750180.
- Y. Mao et al., “A Survey on Mobile Edge Computing: The Communication Perspective,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts, Vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 2322–2358, Apr. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2745201.
- J. Gubbi, R. Buyya, S. Marusic, and M. Palaniswami, “Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions,” Future Generation Computer Systems, Vol. 29, No. 7, pp.1645-1660, Sept. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010.
- Chen, A.; Liu, F.H.; Wang, S.D.e. Data reduction for real-time bridge vibration data on edge. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Internation-al Con-ference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics, DSAA, Washington, DC, USA, 5–8 October 2019; pp. 602–603. https://doi.org/10.1109/DSAA.2019.00077.
- Kyung-rae. C ; Seok-min.H; Won-hyuk.C . Performance Comparison and Optimal Selection of Computing Techniques for Corridor Sur-veillance Journal of the Korean Society of Navigation, 2023, 27.6: 771-776.
- IFTIKHAR, Sundas, et al. AI-based fog and edge computing: A systematic review, taxonomy and future directions. Internet of Things, 2023, 21: 100674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2022.100674.
- HUA, Haochen, et al. Edge computing with artificial intelligence: A machine learning perspective. ACM Computing Surveys, 2023, 55.9: 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555802.
- JMERENDA, Massimo; PORCARO, Carlo; IERO, Demetrio. Edge machine learning for ai-enabled iot devices: A review. Sensors, 2020, 20.9: 2533. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20092533.
-
Downloads
-
How to Cite
Choi , W.- hyuk ., & Jung, W.-J. . . (2025). A Comparative Study of Computing Paradigms for Real-TimeImage Processing: Cloud, Edge, And On-Device AI. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 14(3), 332-337. https://doi.org/10.14419/cbjvn374
