Fostering Sustainable Innovation through Digital Competence: The Effect of Generation Z’s Work Engagement and Inclusive Leadership in Technology Companies

  • Authors

    • Jie Xu International College, National Institute of Development Administration, Bangkok, Thailand
    • Vesarach Aumeboonsuke International College, National Institute of Development Administration, Bangkok, Thailand
    https://doi.org/10.14419/3dnktn35

    Received date: June 11, 2025

    Accepted date: July 12, 2025

    Published date: July 17, 2025

  • Digital Competence, Employee Innovation Behavior, Gen Z, Inclusive Leadership, Work Engagement

  • Abstract

    This study explores the impact of digital competence on the innovation behavior of Generation Z employees in Chinese technology firms, emphasizing the mediating role of work engagement and the moderating influence of inclusive leadership. Drawing on Social Cognitive Theory, the research develops and tests a model to explain how technological capabilities lead to innovative outcomes. Data were collected from 406 Generation Z employees in R&D departments of leading Chinese technology firms. The results revealed that digital competence positively influences innovation behavior, both directly and indirectly, by enhancing work engagement, which in turn boosts innovation. Work engagement was found to be a partial mediator, suggesting that digital competence promotes innovation by increasing employees' vigor, dedication, and absorption in their tasks. Additionally, inclusive leadership was shown to moderate the relationship between digital competence and work engagement, with stronger effects observed when inclusive leadership practices were high. This study highlights the importance of integrating human capital development, psychological resources, and organizational practices to foster innovation. For firms seeking sustainable competitive advantage in dynamic technological environments, the findings suggest strategies focusing on digital skills, work engagement, and inclusive leadership.

  • References

    1. Tsou, H.-T. and J.-S. Chen, How does digital technology usage benefit firm performance? Digital transformation strategy and organisational inno-vation as mediators. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2023. 35(9): p. 1114-1127.
    2. Rehman, H.M., N. Adnan, and S. Moffett, Innovation bloom: nurturing sustainability in urban manufacturing transformation amidst Industry 4.0 and aging workforce dynamics. Annals of Operations Research, 2024.
    3. Yang, H. and D. Zhou, Perceived Organizational Support and Creativity of Science-Technology Talents in the Digital Age: The Effects of Affec-tive Commitment, Innovative Self-Efficacy and Digital Thinking. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 2022. 15(null): p. 2421-2437.
    4. Falloon, G., From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2020. 68(5): p. 2449-2472.
    5. Benítez-Márquez, M.D., et al., Generation Z Within the Workforce and in the Workplace: A Bibliometric Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022. 12.
    6. Scott, S.G. and R.A. Bruce, Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace. Academy of Man-agement Journal, 1994. 37(3): p. 580-607.
    7. Anderson, N., K. Potočnik, and J. Zhou, Innovation and Creativity in Organizations:A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework. Journal of Management, 2014. 40(5): p. 1297-1333.
    8. Parker, S.K. and G. Grote, Automation, Algorithms, and Beyond: Why Work Design Matters More Than Ever in a Digital World. Applied Psy-chology, 2022. 71(4): p. 1171-1204.
    9. Bandura, A., Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986. 1986(23-28).
    10. Schaufeli, W.B., A.B. Bakker, and M. Salanova, Utrecht work engagement scale-9. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2003.
    11. Cai, W., et al. Optimizing Employee Creativity in the Digital Era: Uncovering the Interactional Effects of Abilities, Motivations, and Opportunities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020. 17, DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17031038.
    12. Huu, P.T., Impact of employee digital competence on the relationship between digital autonomy and innovative work behavior: a systematic review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2023. 56(12): p. 14193-14222.
    13. Cortellazzo, L., E. Bruni, and R. Zampieri, The Role of Leadership in a Digitalized World: A Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019. 10.
    14. Heim, I. and N. Sardar-Drenda, Assessment of employees’ attitudes toward ongoing organizational transformations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2021. 34(2): p. 327-349.
    15. Leonidou, E., et al., An integrative framework of stakeholder engagement for innovation management and entrepreneurship development. Journal of Business Research, 2020. 119: p. 245-258.
    16. Li, M. and Y. Liu, The influence of digital innovation ecosystem of high-end equipment manufacturing on the intelligent maturity of enterprise – an empirical study on the configuration of the “three-layer core-periphery” structure. Business Process Management Journal, 2024. 30(1): p. 199-221.
    17. Bandura, A., Social Cognitive Theory in Cultural Context. Applied Psychology, 2002. 51(2): p. 269-290.
    18. Bandura, A., Toward a Psychology of Human Agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2006. 1(2): p. 164-180.
    19. Chughtai, M.S. and Y. Khalid, Learning Organizations and Innovative Work Behaviors: A Moderated Mediation Model of Creative Self-Efficacy and Self-Leadership from the Perspective of Social Cognitive Theory and Social Schema Theory. Journal of Innovative Research in Management Sciences, 2022: p. 22-41.
    20. Al-Dokhny, A., et al., Students’ Intentions to Use Distance Education Platforms: An Investigation into Expanding the Technology Acceptance Model through Social Cognitive Theory. Electronics, 2021. 10(23).
    21. Carillo, K., Understanding IS Theory: An Interpretation of Key IS Theoretical Frameworks Using Social Cognitive Theory, in Information Systems Theory: Explaining and Predicting Our Digital Society, Vol. 2, Y.K. Dwivedi, M.R. Wade, and S.L. Schneberger, Editors. 2012, Springer New York: New York, NY. p. 241-280.
    22. Bai, Y., L. Li, and J.T. and Liu, Leveraging the employee voice: a multi-level social learning perspective of ethical leadership. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2019. 30(12): p. 1869-1901.
    23. Gómez-Trigueros, I.M., M. Ruiz-Bañuls, and D. Ortega-Sánchez, Digital Literacy of Teachers in Training: Moving from ICTs (Information and Communication Technologies) to LKTs (Learning and Knowledge Technologies). Education Sciences, 2019. 9(4).
    24. Sánchez-Canut, S., et al., Professional Digital Competence: Definition, Frameworks, Measurement, and Gender Differences: A Systematic Litera-ture Review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2023. 2023(1): p. 8897227.
    25. Janssen, O., Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psy-chology, 2000. 73(3): p. 287-302.
    26. Yuan, F. and R.W. Woodman, Innovative Behavior in the Workplace: The Role of Performance and Image Outcome Expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 2010. 53(2): p. 323-342.
    27. Lei, H., et al., Enterprise digitalization, employee digital literacy and R&D cooperation: the moderating role of organizational inertia. Chinese Man-agement Studies, 2024. 18(2): p. 479-505.
    28. Wang, G., et al., Unlocking digital potential: Exploring the drivers of employee dynamic capability on employee digital performance in Chinese SMEs-moderation effect of competitive climate. Heliyon, 2024. 10(4).
    29. Trieu, H.D.X., et al., Organisational resilience, ambidexterity and performance: the roles of information technology competencies, digital transfor-mation policies and paradoxical leadership. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 2024. 32(7): p. 1302-1321.
    30. Welch, M., The evolution of the employee engagement concept: communication implications. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 2011. 16(4): p. 328-346.
    31. Jenaro, C., et al., Vigour and dedication in nursing professionals: towards a better understanding of work engagement. Journal of Advanced Nurs-ing, 2011. 67(4): p. 865-875.
    32. Mazzetti, G., et al., Work Engagement: A meta-Analysis Using the Job Demands-Resources Model. Psychological Reports, 2023. 126(3): p. 1069-1107.
    33. Trenerry, B., et al., Preparing Workplaces for Digital Transformation: An Integrative Review and Framework of Multi-Level Factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021. 12.
    34. Sang, G., et al., Effort expectancy mediates the relationship between instructors’ digital competence and their work engagement: evidence from universities in China. Educational technology research and development, 2023. 71(1): p. 99-115.
    35. Rubel, M.R.B., D.M.H. Kee, and N.N. Rimi, Promoting technology innovation performance through high involvement HRM, technology adapta-tion and innovativeness. Business Process Management Journal, 2023. 29(5): p. 1277-1302.
    36. Koroglu, Ş. and O. Ozmen, the mediating effect of work engagement on innovative work behavior and the role of psychological well-being in the job demands–resources (JD-R) model. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 2022. 14(1): p. 124-144.
    37. Ali, H., M. Li, and X. Qiu, Employee Engagement and Innovative Work Behavior Among Chinese Millennials: Mediating and Moderating Role of Work-Life Balance and Psychological Empowerment. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022. Volume 13 - 2022.
    38. Lee, K.-J. and S.-Y. Choi, Resourceful and demanding attributes of organisational culture, employee satisfaction, and organisational performance of large R&D intensive firms in the US. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2024. 36(11): p. 3187-3200.
    39. Nembhard, I.M. and A.C. Edmondson, Making it safe: the effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and im-provement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2006. 27(7): p. 941-966.
    40. Randel, A.E., et al., Inclusive leadership: Realizing positive outcomes through belongingness and being valued for uniqueness. Human Resource Management Review, 2018. 28(2): p. 190-203.
    41. Wu, W.-L. and Y.-C. Lee, Do Work Engagement and Transformational Leadership Facilitate Knowledge Sharing? A Perspective of Conservation of Resources Theory. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020. 17(7).
    42. Atiku, S.O., K.A. Itembu-Naunyango, and O.M. Oladejo Inclusive Leadership and Employee Engagement as Critical Drivers of Sustainability in Telecommunication Companies. Administrative Sciences, 2024. 14, DOI: 10.3390/admsci14060126.
    43. Borisov, I. and S. Vinogradov, Inclusiveness as a key determinant of work engagement: evidence from V4 countries. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 2022. 17(4): p. 1015-1050.
    44. Boccoli, G., L. Gastaldi, and M. Corso, Transformational leadership and work engagement in remote work settings: the moderating role of the su-pervisor’s digital communication skills. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 2024. 45(7): p. 1240-1257.
    45. Chatterjee, S., et al., Digital workplace and organization performance: Moderating role of digital leadership capability. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2023. 8(1): p. 100334.
    46. Antonietti, C., A. Cattaneo, and F. Amenduni, Can teachers’ digital competence influence technology acceptance in vocational education? Com-puters in Human Behavior, 2022. 132: p. 107266.
    47. Redecker, C., European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. 2017.
    48. Wang, Y.-X., et al., The mediating role of inclusive leadership: Work engagement and innovative behaviour among Chinese head nurses. Journal of Nursing Management, 2019. 27(4): p. 688-696.
    49. Fang, Y.-C., et al., The Impact of Inclusive Leadership on Employees’ Innovative Behaviors: The Mediation of Psychological Capital. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019. 10.
    50. Hair, J.F., et al., An Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling, in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook, J.F. Hair Jr, et al., Editors. 2021, Springer International Publishing: Cham. p. 1-29.
    51. Nunnally, J. and I. Bernstein, Psychometric Theory 3rd edition (MacGraw-Hill, New York). 1994.
    52. Fornell, C. and D.F. Larcker, Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 1981. 18(3): p. 382-388.
    53. Ali, H., M. Li, and X. Qiu, Employee Engagement and Innovative Work Behavior Among Chinese Millennials: Mediating and Moderating Role of Work-Life Balance and Psychological Empowerment. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022. 13.
    54. Saha, P., A. Sengupta, and P. Gupta, Influence of personality traits on generation Z consumers' click-through intentions towards personalized ad-vertisements: A mixed-methods study. Heliyon, 2024. 10(15).
    55. Banmairuroy, W., T. Kritjaroen, and W. Homsombat, The effect of knowledge-oriented leadership and human resource development on sustainable competitive advantage through organizational innovation's component factors: Evidence from Thailand ’s new S- curve industries. Asia Pacific Management Review, 2022. 27(3): p. 200-209.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Xu, J., & Aumeboonsuke, V. . (2025). Fostering Sustainable Innovation through Digital Competence: The Effect of Generation Z’s Work Engagement and Inclusive Leadership in Technology Companies. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 14(3), 106-115. https://doi.org/10.14419/3dnktn35