Safety and Performance of FILASILKTM Silk Surgical Suture in Real-World Surgical Practice: A Retrospective Observational Study

  • Authors

    • Anand Tank SMVS Swaminarayan Hospital, Gandhinagar, Gujarat
    • Rajdip Limbola SMVS Swaminarayan Hospital, Gandhinagar, Gujarat
    • Sweta Parmar Department of Product Performance and Engineering Department, Meril Life Sciences, Vapi, Gujarat, India
    • Vishal Sharma Department of Product Performance and Engineering Department, Meril Life Sciences, Vapi, Gujarat, India
    • Kiran Kumar Shetty Department of Product Performance and Engineering Department, Meril Life Sciences, Vapi, Gujarat, India
    https://doi.org/10.14419/vjy78c06

    Received date: June 7, 2025

    Accepted date: July 7, 2025

    Published date: September 8, 2025

  • Natural silk suture; non-absorbable sutures; Wound dehiscence; Surgical complications

  • Abstract

    Background

    Silk remains one of the oldest and most versatile suture materials used in surgery. Despite advances in synthetic sutures, the clinical utility of natural non-absorbable silk remains relevant, particularly with modern processing enhancements.

    Objective

    This study aimed to evaluate the safety and performance of FilasilkTM (Meril Endo Surgery Pvt Ltd) sutures across various surgical specialties in a real-world clinical setting.

    Methods

    This was a retrospective, multi-centre, observational study conducted at three surgical centres in India between December 2018 and April 2023. A total of 163 patients who underwent soft tissue approximation or ligation procedures using the investigational silk suture were included. Primary outcomes included wound complications within one week, while secondary outcomes assessed complications and healing up to three months postoperatively.

    Results

    Of the 163 patients analysed, the mean age was 52.09±16.21 years, and males constituted 63.19% of the cohort. The most common procedures involved general, ophthalmic, and plastic surgeries. Wound dehiscence was noted in 4.29% of patients at one week, reducing to 3.07% at three months. Wound infection occurred in 1.84% of patients at one week, with no cases persisting at three months. Suture erosion (1.23%), hematoma (3.07%), and seroma (0.61%) were infrequent. Procedural complications such as breakage or inaccurate placement were rare (<2%). The suture demonstrated excellent biocompatibility, knot security, and handling across varied surgical contexts.

    Conclusion

    FilasilkTM sutures remain a clinically viable and environmentally sustainable alternative to synthetic materials. With low complication rates, favourable handling characteristics, and broad applicability, silk sutures continue to play a valuable role in modern surgical care.

  • References

    1. Recent Advances in Antimicrobial Treatments of Textiles - Yuan Gao, Robin Cranston, 2008 [Internet]. [cited 2025 May 21]. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0040517507082332?casa_token=23DriXgHE7wAAAAA:ZzcWUVgjmxQtiKriqcDGekv2gb469M9W89kI4rQ_NG39s6FKM6quUyXOD_-5fwb13iTxrdEkGHeOghAlpQ&casa_token=I1z5DuoXNsgAAAAA:3FY2wnU7ETzefzFi_3y64r4HnvUwUpRrOzXbgRYRIdgusMpNlJMtz0vrmGFPl9b44LdyqPX61T7tib57sQ
    2. Baack BR, Stulberg DL, Usatine RP. 5 - Suture Material. In: Usatine RP, Pfenninger JL, Stulberg DL, Small R, editors. Dermatologic and Cosmetic Pro-cedures in Office Practice [Internet]. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2012 [cited 2025 May 21]. p. 37–45. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9781437705805000054
    3. Thilagavathi G, Viju S. 11 - Silk as a suture material. In: Basu A, editor. Advances in Silk Science and Technology [Internet]. Woodhead Publishing; 2015 [cited 2025 May 21]. p. 219–32. (Woodhead Publishing Series in Textiles). Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9781782423119000112
    4. Viju S, Marian Shilpa L, Thilagavathi G. Functionalized Silk for Surgical Suture Applications. In: Majumdar A, Gupta D, Gupta S, editors. Functional Textiles and Clothing. Singapore: Springer; 2019. p. 49–65.
    5. Abdulkareem ZB, Naeem LA, Jassim MM. Comparative study between silk suture and metallic Staplers in skin wound closure in Rabbits. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng. 2019 Jul;571(1):012059.
    6. Gv V, Nadaf H, Rb S, Chandrashekhraiah, Rathore M. Studies on Silk as a suture in medical science. 2019 Oct 12;8:97–100.
    7. Altman GH, Diaz F, Jakuba C, Calabro T, Horan RL, Chen J, Lu H, Richmond J, Kaplan DL. Silk-based biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2003 Feb;24(3):401-16.
    8. Pillai CKS, Sharma CP. Review paper: absorbable polymeric surgical sutures: chemistry, production, properties, biodegradability, and performance. J Biomater Appl. 2010 Nov;25(4):291–366.
    9. Comparison of tensile and knot security properties of surgical sutures | Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine [Internet]. [cited 2025 May 21]. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10856-007-3114-6
    10. Rose J, Tuma F. Sutures And Needles. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 [cited 2025 May 21]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK539891/
    11. Carella S, Fioramonti P, Onesti MG, Scuderi N. Comparison between antimicrobial-coated sutures and uncoated sutures for the prevention of surgical site infections in plastic surgery: a double blind control trial. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019 Feb;23(3):958–64.
    12. Altman GH, Diaz F, Jakuba C, Calabro T, Horan RL, Chen J, et al. Silk-based biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2003 Feb;24(3):401–16.
    13. Kaplan D, Adams WW, Farmer B, Viney C. Silk: Biology, Structure, Properties, and Genetics. In: Silk Polymers [Internet]. American Chemical Society; 1993 [cited 2025 May 21]. p. 2–16. (ACS Symposium Series; vol. 544). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-1994-0544.ch001
    14. Kathju S, Nistico L, Hall-Stoodley L, Post JC, Ehrlich GD, Stoodley P. Chronic surgical site infection due to suture-associated polymicrobial biofilm. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2009 Oct;10(5):457–61.
    15. Greenwald D, Shumway S, Albear P, Gottlieb L. Mechanical comparison of 10 suture materials before and after in vivo incubation. J Surg Res. 1994 Apr;56(4):372–7.
    16. Carella S, Fioramonti P, Onesti MG, Scuderi N. Comparison between antimicrobial-coated sutures and uncoated sutures for the prevention of surgical site infections in plastic surgery: a double blind control trial. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019 Feb;23(3):958-964

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Tank, A. ., Limbola, R. ., Parmar, S., Sharma, V., & Shetty, K. K. (2025). Safety and Performance of FILASILKTM Silk Surgical Suture in Real-World Surgical Practice: A Retrospective Observational Study. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 14(5), 240-246. https://doi.org/10.14419/vjy78c06