Toward Pervasive Intelligence Systems: Looking Ahead in Cyber-physical World in Pervasive Computing
-
https://doi.org/10.14419/s5wzx363
Received date: May 6, 2025
Accepted date: May 18, 2025
Published date: June 10, 2025
-
Cyber-Physical World (CPW); Cyber Threats; Communication; Pervasive Computing; Bid Data -
Abstract
The physical world is becoming filled with communication and computing units that communicate with one another and users; almost everything will be able to gather data and react to relevant stimuli. Through sensing, computing, and transmission components, real-world elements interact with cyberspace in this technologically advanced situation, leading to the so-called convergence of the Cyber-Physical World (CPW). However, the ubiquitous computing environment and IoT devices are susceptible to various threats due to their dynamic operation and the requirement to manage private and sensitive data. A high degree of safety guarantee is necessary for smart environments, such as trusted context producers and consumers, which should shield private data from exposure or surveillance. A unique, lightweight security architecture that authenticates and preserves the context of providers and receivers is proposed in the research, along with a discussion of the primary cyber threats in smart environments. Several recent research studies have proposed a definition of CPS that encompasses all the characteristics mentioned in the various domains. We contrast those several CPS plans, talk about some related concepts and technology, and wrap up by outlining the primary research issues in the field.
-
References
- Conti, M., Das, S. K., Bisdikian, C., Kumar, M., Ni, L. M., Passarella, A., ... & Zambonelli, F. (2012). Looking ahead in pervasive computing: Chal-lenges and opportunities in the era of cyber–physical convergence. Pervasive and mobile computing, 8(1), 2-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2011.10.001.
- Ahmed, S. H., Kim, G., & Kim, D. (2013). Cyber Physical System: Architecture, applications and research challenges. 2013 IFIP Wireless Days (WD), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/WD.2013.6686528.
- Ma, M., Lin, W., Pan, D., Lin, Y., Wang, P., Zhou, Y., & Liang, X. (2018). Data and decision intelligence for human-in-the-loop cyber-physical systems: reference model, recent progresses and challenges. Journal of Signal Processing Systems, 90, 1167-1178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-017-1304-0.
- Ning, H., Liu, H., Ma, J., Yang, L. T., & Huang, R. (2016). Cybermatics: Cyber–physical–social–thinking hyperspace based science and technology. Future generation computer systems, 56, 504-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2015.07.012.
- Karnouskos, S. (2011, July). Cyber-physical systems in the smartgrid. In 2011 9th IEEE international conference on industrial informatics (pp. 20-23). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/INDIN.2011.6034829.
- Horváth, I., & Vroom, R. W. (2015). Ubiquitous computer aided design: A broken promise or a Sleeping Beauty?. Computer-Aided Design, 59, 161-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2014.10.006.
- Noor, A. K. (2011). Intelligent adaptive cyber-physical ecosystem for aerospace engineering education, training, and accelerated workforce devel-opment. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 24(4), 403-408. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000128.
- Kant, V. (2016). Cyber-physical systems as sociotechnical systems: a view towards human–technology interaction. Cyber-Physical Systems, 2(1-4), 75-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/23335777.2017.1289983.
- Babiceanu, R. F., & Seker, R. (2016). Big Data and virtualization for manufacturing cyber-physical systems: A survey of the current status and fu-ture outlook. Computers in industry, 81, 128-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2016.02.004.
- Cook, D. J., & Das, S. K. (2012). Pervasive computing at scale: Transforming the state of the art. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 8(1), 22-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2011.10.004.
- Vuong, T. P., Loukas, G., & Gan, D. (2015, October). Performance evaluation of cyber-physical intrusion detection on a robotic vehicle. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing (pp. 2106-2113). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIT/IUCC/DASC/PICOM.2015.313.
- Moldovan, D., Copil, G., & Dustdar, S. (2018). Elastic systems: Towards cyber-physical ecosystems of people, processes, and things. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 57, 76-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2017.04.002.
- Cheng, Y., Zhang, Y., Ji, P., Xu, W., Zhou, Z., & Tao, F. (2018). Cyber-physical integration for moving digital factories forward towards smart manufacturing: a survey. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 97, 1209-1221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2001-2.
- Parnianifard, A., Jearavongtakul, S., Sasithong, P., Sinpan, N., Poomrittigul, S., Bajpai, A., ... & Wuttisittikulkij, L. (2022). Digital-twins towards cyber-physical systems: a brief survey. Engineering Journal, 26(9), 47-61. https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2022.26.9.47.
- Attkan, A., & Ranga, V. (2022). Cyber-physical security for IoT networks: a comprehensive review on traditional, blockchain and artificial intelli-gence based key-security. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 8(4), 3559-3591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-022-00667-z.
-
Downloads
-
How to Cite
Manikanthan, S., Babu , D. L. R. A. ., George, D. A. P. ., Sri, D. ., & Venkatesan, M. (2025). Toward Pervasive Intelligence Systems: Looking Ahead in Cyber-physical World in Pervasive Computing. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 14(2), 119-124. https://doi.org/10.14419/s5wzx363
