Forecasting and Latent Heterogeneity in Multi-Departmental Manpower ‎Systems: A Hidden Markov Framework

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ukaogo Greatman Odinakachukwu Department of Data Science and Analytics, School of Information Technology and Computing, ‎ American University of Nigeria, Yola, Adamawa State
  • Everestus Okafor Ossai Department of Statistics, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
  • Ohanuba Felix Obi Department of Computer and Data Science, School of Computing and Information ‎ Technology, Nigerian British University, Asa, Abia State
  • Ukobong Gregory Ebedoro Department of Data Science and Analytics, School of Information Technology and Computing, ‎ American University of Nigeria, Yola, Adamawa State
  • Felix James Department of Data Science and Analytics, School of Information Technology and Computing, ‎ American University of Nigeria, Yola, Adamawa State

About this article

Download PDF

Keywords:

Manpower Planning; Hidden Markov Manpower Model; Latent Heterogeneity; ‎Departmentalized Manpower System; Workforce Forecasting

Abstract

Recent advances in manpower planning have emphasized the need to model workforce systems ‎within departmentalized frameworks, reflecting the structural reality of most organizations. ‎While departmentalization serves as a form of disaggregation that can address observable ‎heterogeneity, it does not eliminate heterogeneity arising from latent, unobservable factors and ‎may instead introduce additional forms of hidden variability associated with intra-departmental ‎and inter-departmental transitions. This study aims to develop and apply a generalized hidden ‎Markov manpower model for forecasting and analyzing latent heterogeneity in multi-‎departmental manpower systems. A recursive forecasting structure is derived and applied to a ‎real departmentalized manpower dataset obtained from a university non-academic workforce, ‎under the assumption of stable recruitment and promotion policies. The empirical results reveal ‎a dominance of diagonal elements in the estimated transition probability matrix, indicating slow ‎promotion dynamics across departments and grades. Forecasts over multiple periods show a ‎gradual decline in lower-grade manpower stocks and relative stability in higher-grade ‎categories, with marked differences in promotion propensities across latent subclasses within ‎the same observable categories. These findings confirm the significant role of latent ‎heterogeneity in shaping long-term manpower evolution. In summary, the generalized ‎departmentalized hidden Markov manpower model developed in this study offers a more ‎suitable framework for describing and forecasting manpower systems. By explicitly ‎incorporating both departmental structure and unobservable differences in personnel behaviour, ‎the model produces more reliable forecasts and provides insights that are useful for informed ‎manpower planning and policy decisions‎.

References

[1] Bartholomew DJ, Forbes AF & McClean SI (1991), Statistical techniques for manpower planning (2nd ed.). Wiley.

[2] Dimitriou VA & Tsantas N (2009), Prospective control in an enhanced manpower planning model. Applied Mathematics and Computation 215(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2009.06.027.

[3] Carette P & Guerry M-A (2022), Markov models for duration-dependent transitions: selecting the states using duration values or duration intervals. Statistical Methods & Applications 31(5), 1203–1223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-022-00637-2.

[4] Ugwuowo FI & McClean SI (2000), Modelling heterogeneity in a manpower system: a review. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry 16(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/1526-4025(200004/06)16:2<99::AID-ASMB385>3.0.CO;2-3.

[5] Rabiner LR (1989), A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE 77(2), 257–286. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.18626.

View more references (17)

[6] Bartholomew DJ, Hopes RFA & Smith AR (1976), Manpower planning in the face of uncertainty. Personnel Review 5(3), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb055311.

[7] De Feyter T (2006), Modelling heterogeneity in manpower planning: dividing the personnel system into more homogeneous subgroups. Applied Sto-chastic Models in Business and Industry 22(4), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.619.

[8] Guerry MA (2011), Hidden heterogeneity in manpower systems: a Markov-switching model approach. European Journal of Operational Research 210(1), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.10.039.

[9] Udom AU & Ebedoro UG (2021), On multinomial hidden Markov model for hierarchical manpower systems. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods 50(6), 1370–1386. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2019.1650185.

[10] Udom AU, Ebedoro UG & Udoh NS (2019), Structural configuration in a multinomial hierarchical manpower system using hidden Markov model. Taru Journal of Organizational Behaviour & Analytics I(2-4),111-128 https://doi.org/10.47974/2019.TJOBA.014.

[11] Blumen I, Kogan M & McCarthy PJ (1955), The industrial mobility of labour as a probability process. Cornell University Press.

[12] Spilerman S (1972), Extensions of the mover–stayer model. American Journal of Sociology 78(3), 599–626. https://doi.org/10.1086/225366.

[13] Ossai EO, Ezra PN, Ohanuba FO & Eze MN (2022), Homogeneity versus parsimony in Markov manpower models: a hidden Markov chain ap-proach. Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics 20(4), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajpas/2022/v20i4441.

[14] Ossai EO & Uche PI (2009), Maintainability of departmentalized manpower structures in Markov chain model. The Pacific Journal of Science and Technology 10(2), 295–302.

[15] Guerry MA & De Feyter T (2012), Optimal recruitment strategies in a multi-level manpower planning model. Journal of the Operational Research Society 63(7), 931–940. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2011.99.

[16] Dimitriou VA, Georgiou AC & Tsantas N (2013), The multivariate non-homogeneous Markov manpower system in a departmental mobility frame-work. European Journal of Operational Research 228(1), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.12.014.

[17] Dimitriou VA, Georgiou AC & Tsantas N (2015), On the equilibrium personnel structure in the presence of vertical and horizontal mobility via multi-variate Markov chains. Journal of the Operational Research Society 66(6), 993–1006. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2014.66.

[18] Dimitriou VA & Georgiou AC (2021), Introduction, analysis and asymptotic behavior of a multilevel manpower planning model in a continuous time setting under potential department contraction. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods 50(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2019.1648827.

[19] Ossai EO, Nduka UC, Madukaife MS, Udom AU & Ugwu SO (2024), An extended Markov-switching model approach to latent heterogeneity in departmentalized manpower systems. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods 53(19), 6957–6976. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2023.2255322.

[20] Cox DR (1972), Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 34(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x.

[21] Ukaogo OG, Ossai EO, Nduka UC, Ugah TE, Ugwu SO & Nwakobi NM (2026), Selection of optimum number of states for a hidden Markov man-power model in a departmentalized framework. Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics 28(5), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajpas/2026/v28i5898.

[22] Ogbogbo GO, Ebuh GU & Aronu CO (2013), Prediction of academic manpower system of a Polytechnic institution in Nigeria. Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics 1(5), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjams.20130105.14.