Optimal Biasing Parameter Selection for Shrinkage Estimators in High-Dimensional Multicollinear Systems
About this article
Keywords:
Cross-Validation; Data-Driven Methods; Machine Learning; MulticollinearityAbstract
Severe multicollinearity remains a challenge in regression analysis, leading to reduced estimator efficiency. A biased parameter estimator is a popular approach that provides various remedies for the problem, but the performance of this estimator will depend on the selection of the biasing parameter. This paper explores and compares different biasing parameter selection strategies, including one-and two-parameter biased estimators, emphasizing fixed, data-driven, cross-validation, and machine learning-based solutions in different sample sizes and predictor degree relationships. The study used a Monte Carlo simulation that generated data at the conditions of strong multicollinearity (ρx ranging from 0.7, 0.75, 0.8, 0.85, 0.9, 0.95, and 0.99), varying error variance (σ = 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20), and sample sizes (n = 100, 500, 1000, 5000, and 10,000). The performance of the estimators was analyzed with MSE, which allows the systematic comparison of different methods for selection of biasing parameters under different types of multicollinearity and sample sizes. The results consistently indicate that the machine learning–based selection provides the lowest MSE in all cases and is increasingly advantageous as increasing multicollinearity is encountered and sample size reduces. Data-driven methods provide competitive outcomes and clearly improve over fixed parameter and cross-validation. Cross-validating methods experience inefficiency under more complex multicollinearity scenarios. To validate the simulation studies, a real-world data setting was applied using the Ames housing dataset. The machine learning approach also produced the best predictive performance, recording the lowest MSE, substantially outperforming the fixed, data-driven, and cross-validation methods in the real-data application. Thus, in the presence of severe multicollinearity, practitioners and researchers should go beyond applying fixed or only cross-validation–based rules but use machine learning or data-driven guided approaches.
References
[1] Akay, K. U., Ertan, E., and Erkoç, A. (2023). A New biased estimator and variations based on the Kibria Lukman Estimator. Istanbul Journal of Mathematics, 1(2), 74-85. https://doi.org/10.26650/ijmath.2023.00009.
[2] Akhtar, N., and Alharthi, M. F. (2025). Enhancing accuracy in modelling highly multicollinear data using alternative shrinkage parameters for ridge regression methods. Scientific Reports, 15, 10774. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94857-7.
[3] Ayinde, K., Alabi, O. O., and Nwosu, U. I. (2021). Solving multicollinearity problem in linear regression model: The review suggests new idea of partitioning and extraction of the explanatory variables. Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Studies, 2(1), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.32996/jmss.2021.2.1.2.
[4] Dawoud, I., Abonazel, M. R., and Awwad, F. A. (2022). Generalized Kibria-Lukman estimator: method, simulation, and application. Frontiers in Ap-plied Mathematics and Statistics, 8, 880086. https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2022.880086.
[5] De Cock, D. (2011). Ames, Iowa: Alternative to the Boston housing data as an end-of-semester regression project. Journal of Statistics Educa-tion, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2011.11889627.
View more references (8)
[6] El-doakly, W. S. H. (2024). A comparative study of some two-parameter ridge-type and Liu-type estimators to combat the multicollinearity problem in regression models: Simulation and application. Journal of Statistics and Econometrics, 54(4), 105–136. https://doi.org/10.21608/jsec.2024.395938.
[7] Hoerl, A. E., and Kennard, R. W. (1970). Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics, 12(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1970.10488634.
[8] Kibria, B. G., and Lukman, A. F. (2020). A new ridge‐type estimator for the linear regression model: simulations and applica-tions. Scientifica, 2020(1). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9758378.
[9] Kibria, B. M. G. (2003). Performance of some new ridge regression estimators. Communications in Statistics Simulation and Computation, 32(2), 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1081/SAC-120017499.
[10] Liu, K. (1993). A new class of biased estimate in linear regression. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 22(2), 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610929308831027.
[11] Luqman, A. F., Ayinde, K., and Dawoud, I. (2025). Data-driven biasing parameter selection strategies for shrinkage estimators under severe multi-collinearity. Statistical Papers, 66(2), 1123–1145.
[12] Luqman, M., Bhatti, S. H., Aydin, D., and Jamil, M. (2025). Addressing multicollinearity in general linear model: A novel approach for ridge param-eter with performance comparison. PLOS ONE, 20(10), e0335072. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335072.
[13] Ugwuowo, F. I., Oranye, H. E., and Arum, K. C. (2023). On the jackknife Kibria-Lukman estimator for the linear regression model. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 52(12), 6116–6128. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2021.2007401.