Petro physical properties analysis of beani bazar gas field, Bangladesh using wireline log interpretation

  • Authors

    • G. M. Ariful Islam ''Jessore University of Science and Technology''
    • Farzana Yeasmin Nipa
    • Md. Shaheen Shah
    2017-09-26
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijag.v5i2.8125
  • Hydrocarbon Saturation, Beani Bazar Gas Field, Petro physical Properties, Hydrocarbon Prospect and Wireline Log Data.

  • The study on analysis of petro physical properties which are done into two well such as BB-1 and BB-2 of Beani Bazar Gas Field using wire line log data. In BB-1, Upper Gas Sand (UGS), Lower Gas Sand (LGS), Sand-1 and Bellow Lower Gas Sand (BLGS) zones and in BB-2, UGS and LGS are identified through high gamma ray log, high resistivity, low neutron and low density log response. The thickness of UGS, LGS, Sand-1, BLGS of BB-1 and UGS, LGS of BB-2 are respectively 47.69m, 14.326m, 17.526m, 17.526m and 26.37m, 21.03m. The Shale volumes of UGS, LGS, Sand-1 and BLGS of BB-1 are respectively 14.87%, 21.58%, 11.69% and 21.28% and UGS and LGS of BB-2 are respectively 17.91% and 29.33%, which are measured through Schlumberger Clavier method. The average porosity of UGS, LGS, Sand-1 and BLGS of BB-1 are respectively 17.55%, 16.60%, 18.07% and 31.10% and UGS and LGS of BB-2 are respectively 13.19% and 11.29%, which are very effective for hydrocarbon prospect by using neutron-density combination method. The average water saturations of UGS, LGS, Sand-1 and BLGS of BB-1 are respectively 24.97%, 23.78%, 80.18% and 19.85% which revised to hydrocarbon saturations as respectively 75.03%, 76.22%, 19.82% and 80.15% and UGS and LGS of BB-2 are respectively 41.20% and 69.50% which revised to hydrocarbon saturations as respectively 58.80% and 30.50% that are followed by Simandoux method. By analysis of petro physical properties of those zones, the UGS and LGS are very effective hydrocarbon bearing zones where production is running at the present time, the Sand-1 zone is water bearing zone. This study impose high important on BLGS. This zone is satisfied all criteria for hydrocarbon prospect. This study recommends that more study is needed for BLGS, and it may be commercially economical viable in a future.

  • References

    1. [1] Ajisafe, Y.C.&Ako, B.D. (2013), 3-D Seismic Attributes for Reservoir Characterization of “Y†Field Niger Delta, Nigria.IOSR Journal of Applied Geology and Geophysics,1(2), pp.23-31.https://doi.org/10.9790/0990-0122331.

      [2] Asquith, G.B.& Gibson, C.R. (1982), Basic well log analysis for geologists; Text book, AAPG, Tulsa, Okalhoma, USA, pp. 1-239.

      [3] Hasan, M.M., Akter,F.& Deb, P.K. (2013), Formation Characterization and Identification of Potential Hydrocarbon Zone for Titas Gas Field, Bangladesh Using Wireline Log Data.International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 4(5), pp.1512-1518.

      [4] Schlumberger, (1972), Log Interpretation, Volume-I-Principles; Houston, Schlumberger Well Services Inc.

      [5] Atlas,D. (1979), Log Interpretation Charts; Houston, Dresser Industries. Inc. pp.107.

      [6] Schlumberger, (1979), Log Interpretation Charts; English Metric, Schlumberger publication.

      [7] Simandoux, P. (1963). “Mesures dielectriques en milieu poreux, application a mesure des saturations en eau, Etude du Comportment des massifs Argileuxâ€; Revue de I’Institut Francais du Petrol, Supplementary Issue.

      [8] Ahammod, S., Hai, M.A., Islam, D.M.R.&Sayeem, S.M.A. (2014), Petro-Physical Analysis Of Reservoir Rock Of Fenchuganj Gas Field (Well#03) Using Wireline Log.American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER), 3(8), pp.37-48.

      [9] Ruhovets, N. (1990), A log analysis technique for evaluating laminated reservoir in the Gulf Coast. The log analyst, 3, pp.294-303.

      [10] Fertl, W.H. (1987), Log-derived evaluation of shaly classic reservoirs.Journal of Petroleum Technology, pp.175-193.https://doi.org/10.2118/14061-PA.

      [11] Islam, A.R.M.T.& Islam, M.A. (2014), Evaluation of Gas Reservoir of the Meghna Gas Field, Bangladesh Using Wireline Log Interpretation. Universal Journal of Geosciences, 2(2), pp.62-69.

      [12] Eze, M.O., Mode, A.W.& Ugbor, C.C. (2013), Formation evaluation of X7 field in the Niger Delta: evidence from Petrophysical data. Niger Delta, Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Applied Geology and Geophysics, 1 (4), pp.15 -21.https://doi.org/10.9790/0990-0141521.

      [13] Amigun, J.O., Olisa, B.& Fadeyi, O.O. (2012), Petrophysical analysis of well logs for reservoir evaluation: A case study of ‘Laja’ Oil Field, Niger Delta. Journal of Petroleum and Gas Exploration Research, 2(10), pp.181-187.

      [14] Richardson, A.A.M. (2013), Well Correlation and Petrophysical Analysis, a Case Study of “Rickie†Field Onshore Niger Delta. The International Journal of Engineeringand Science, 2 (12), pp.94-99.

      [15] Adeoti, L., Onyekachi, N., Olatinsu, O., Fatoba, J.& Bello, M. (2014), Static Reservoir Modeling Using Well Log and 3-D Seismic Data in a KN Field, Offshore Niger Delta, Nigeria. International Journal of Geoscience, 5, pp.93-106. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2014.51011.

      [16] Islam, M.A., Islam, M.S., Talukder, S., Haque, K.E., Rahman, M.A.&Ahmed, F. (2009), Petrophysical evaluation of Neogene Shaly-sand gas reservoir: A case study of Kailas Tila Gas Field; Bengal Basin, Bangladesh.International Journal of Earth Science and Engineering, 2, pp.499-511.

      [17] Islam, M.A. (2010), Petrophysical evaluation of subsurface reservoir sandstone of Bengal Basin, Bangladesh.Journal Geological Societyof India, 76, pp.621-631.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-010-0122-9.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Islam, G. M. A., Nipa, F. Y., & Shah, M. S. (2017). Petro physical properties analysis of beani bazar gas field, Bangladesh using wireline log interpretation. International Journal of Advanced Geosciences, 5(2), 95-101. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijag.v5i2.8125