Motivations for Implementing Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Practices in Unlisted Family Firms: A Phenomenological Study
About this article
Keywords:
ESG Practices; Family Firms; Phenomenological Study; Sustainability Motivation; Automotive IndustryAbstract
The increasing emphasis on sustainability in Indonesia has stimulated the adoption of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices, particularly within the automotive sector, which entails substantial environmental and social risk exposure. However, extant literature has predominantly focused on publicly listed firms, leaving the motivational foundations of ESG implementation in non-listed family firms-typically characterized by long-term orientation and strong socioemotional ties-insufficiently examined. This study investigates the motivational drivers of ESG adoption in a non-listed family firm through a qualitative phenomenological approach, using PT Agung Automall as a case study.
Data were obtained from in-depth interviews with 20 key informants across managerial levels, complemented by observation and document analysis. Data analysis followed the procedures of epoché, horizontalization, meaning clustering, and thematic development, with rigor ensured through triangulation and member checking. Grounded in Stakeholder Theory, Socioemotional Wealth Theory, the Resource-Based View, and Legitimacy Theory, and guided by sector-specific SASB standards for the automotive industry, the findings reveal four dominant motivational mechanisms: internalized family values and long-term commitment, regulatory compliance, owner-driven strategic direction, and external stakeholder pressures.
The results further indicate that substantive ESG implementation enhances corporate reputation, reinforces customer loyalty, strengthens governmental relations, and improves organizational resilience during periods of crisis. Notwithstanding these benefits, firms face significant challenges related to organizational culture transformation, infrastructural constraints in regional operations, and high initial investment requirements for environmentally sustainable technologies. This study contributes to the ESG and family business literature by elucidating the motivational logics underpinning ESG engagement in non-listed family firms within emerging market contexts.
References
[1] Amir, A., & Serafeim, G. (2018). Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey. Financial Analysts Journal, 74(3), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v74.n3.2.
[2] Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108.
[3] Barney, J. B., & Hesterly, W. S. (2015). Strategic management and competitive advantage: Concepts and cases (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
[4] Bergh, D. D., Connelly, B. L., Ketchen, D. J., Jr., & Shannon, L. M. (2014). Signaling theory and equilibrium in strategic management research: An assessment and a research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 51(8), 1334–1360. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12097
[5] Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511435355
View more references (28)
[6] Berrone, P., Fosfuri, A., Gelabert, L., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). The governance of sustainability: Stakeholder engagement and board effective-ness in corporate environmental performance. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 889–914.
[7] Burlea-Schiopoiu, A., & Popa, I. (2013). Legitimacy theory. In S. O. Idowu, N. Capaldi, L. Zu, & A. Das Gupta (Eds.), Encyclopedia of corporate social responsibility (pp. 1579–1584). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28036-8_471.
[8] Corporate Finance Institute. (n.d.). Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG). Corporate Finance Institute. https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/esg/esg-environmental-social-governance/
[9] Corvo, E. (2022). The social return on investment model: A systematic literature review. Evaluation and Program Planning, 91, 102037.
[10] Davis, G. F., & Cobb, J. A. (2010). Resource dependence theory: Past and future. In F. Dobbin & C. B. Schoonhoven (Eds.), Stanford’s organization theory renaissance, 1970–2000 (pp. 21–42). Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X(2010)0000028006
[11] De Massis, A., Kotlar, J., Chua, J. H., & Chrisman, J. J. (2014). Ability and willingness as sufficiency conditions for family-oriented particularistic behavior. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(2), 344–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12102.
[12] De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Kotlar, J., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., & Wright, M. (2016). Innovation through tradition: Lessons from innovative family businesses. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0017
[13] DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Ameri-can Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
[14] Donthu, N., & Gustafsson, A. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 on business and research. Journal of Business Research, 117, 284–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.008.
[15] Dyer, W. G., Jr., & Whetten, D. A. (2006). Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the S&P 500. Corporate Reputation Re-view, 9(2), 113–132.
[16] Dyck, A., Lins, K. V., Roth, L., & Wagner, H. F. (2019). Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. Jour-nal of Financial Economics, 131(3), 693–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.08.013.
[17] Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
[18] Freeman, R. E., & McVea, J. (2005). A stakeholder approach to strategic management. In M. A. Hitt, R. E. Freeman, & J. S. Harrison (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of strategic management (pp. 183–201). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631218616.2006.00007.x.
[19] Gillan, S. L., Hartzell, J. C., & Starks, L. T. (2012). Corporate governance, corporate ownership, and the role of institutional investors. Journal of Ap-plied Finance, 22(1), 1–25.
[20] Global Reporting Initiative. (2018). GRI 305: Emissions 2016.
[21] Gjergji, R., Brunelli, S., & Sciascia, S. (2025). A systematic literature review on family business capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 201, 115731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115731.
[22] Given, L. M. (2012). The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. SAGE Publications.
[23] Greening, D. W. (2019). Corporate social performance: Reflections on the role of stakeholders and ethics in corporate governance. Journal of Busi-ness Ethics, 155(2), 245–258.
[24] International Organization for Standardization. (2015). ISO 26000:2015 – Guidance on social responsibility. ISO.
[25] Ishtiaq, M. (2019). Principles of corporate governance and accountability. Routledge.
[26] Kolawole, J. S., Igbekoyi, O. E., & Alabi, A. W. (2025). Unveiling stewardship theory: Emerging trends and future directions. Journal of Business and African Economy, 11(2), 95–112.
[27] Mailani, D., Hulu, M. Z. T., Simamora, M. R., & Kesuma, S. A. (2024). Resource-based view theory to achieve a sustainable competitive advantage: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Studies, 4(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.31098/ijeass.v4i1.2002
[28] Marquis, C., & Qian, C. (2014). Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance? Organization Science, 25(1), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0837.
[29] Nurhayati, S. (2021). Pengaruh ESG disclosure terhadap nilai perusahaan di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 23(2), 145–160.
[30] Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2017). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 51/POJK.03/2017 tentang penerapan keuangan berkelanjutan. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.
[31] Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
[32] Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
[33] Zahra, S. A., & Newey, L. R. (2009). Maximizing the impact of organization science. Journal of Management Studies, 46(6), 1059–1075. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00848.x.