Learning styles towards mathematics achievements among higher education students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14419/gjma.v2i2.2267Abstract
Students all have unique learning styles and preferences. Some may like group instruction while others may enjoy individualized instruction. Some learners are more independent than other learners. The aim of the present study was to identify the learning styles towards mathematic achievements among higher education students. One hundred and fifty-three first year students in a mathematic course participated in the study. Grasha-Riehmann Learning Style Scale was used to determine students’ learning styles. Grasha-Riehmann Learning Style Scale consists of six learning style (independent, dependent, avoidant, and participant, collaborative and competitive). By used cluster analysis, 4 cluster/groups are obtained. As cluster 1 is identified as collaborative and competitive, cluster 2 is collaborative, dependent and participant, cluster 3 competitive and cluster 4 is collaborative. Results based on ANOVA test shown that, there was no significant among students with different learning styles with respect to mathematic achievement.
Keywords: Cluster Analysis, Anova, Grasha-Riehmann Learning Style.
References
Andrews RH. (1990). the development of a learning styles program in a low socioeconomic, underachieving North Carolina elementary school. J. Reading Writing Learn. Disabil. Int., 6: 307-314.
Cano J. (1999). The relationship between learning style, academic major, and academic performance of college students. J Agric. Educ., 40: 30-37.
Ching, T. Y., Dillon, H., Day, J., Crowe, K., Close, L., Chisholm, K., & Hopkins, T. (2009). Early language outcomes of children with cochlear implants: Interim findings of the NAL study on longitudinal outcomes of children. Cochlear implants international, 10(Supplement-1), 28-32
Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review. Retrieved July 01, 2012 from http://www.lsda.org.uk/files/PDF/1543.pdf
Diaz DP & Cartnal RB. (1999). Students‘learning styles in two classes: Online distance learning and equivalent on-campus. Coll. Teach., 47(4): 130-135.
Dunn R, Griggs SA, Gorman B & Beasley M. (1995). A meta-analytic validation of the Dunn and Dunn model of learning-style preferences. J. Educ. Res., 88: 353-361.
Grasha, A. F. (1994). A matter of style: The teacher as expert, formal authority, personal model, facilitator, and delegator. College teaching, 42(4), 142-149.
Grasha, A.F., (1996). Teaching with style: A practical guide to enhancing learning by understanding teaching and learning styles. San Bernardino, CA: Alliance Publishers.
Grasha-Riechmann Student Learning Style Scale. (2012). Retrieved May 30, 2012, from http://www.ehow.com/about_5511314_grashariechmann-student-learning-style-scale.html Honey P & Mumford A. (1992). The Manual of Learning Styles 3rd Ed. Maidenhead, Peter Honey.
Klavas A. (1994). Learning style program boosts achievement and test scores. The Clearing House, 67: 149-151.
Porter T & Cano J. (1996). Relationship between learning styles, academic major, and academic performance of Ohio State freshmen in College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences. Paper presented at the annual Council of Graduate StudentsResearch Forum, The Ohio State University, and Columbus.
Prabhakar V & Swapna B. (2009). Influence of learning styles. Int. J Learn, 16(9).
Rasimah A & Zurina M. (2008). Student’s Learning Styles and Academic Performance. Annual SAS Malaysia Forum, July 2008, Kuala Lumpur Convention Center.
Rayneri LJ & Gerber BL. (2004). Student perception inventory. Roeper Rev., 26: 90-95.
Rayneri, L. J., & Gerber, B. L. (2004). Development of a student perception inventory. Roeper Review, 26(2), 90-95.
Riechmann, S. W., & Grasha, A. F. (1974). A rational approach to developing and asessing the construct validity of a student learning styles instrument. Journal of Psychology, 87, 213223.
Sorrell, M. F., Belongia, E. A., Costa, J., Gareen, I. F., Grem, J. L., Inadomi, J. M.,& Trotter, H. T. (2009). National Institutes of Health consensus development conference statement: management of hepatitis B. Hepatology, 49(S5), S4-S12.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal''s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).