Modelling and simulation of ZDC controlled PMSG based wind energy conversion system

  • Authors

    • Tripura Pidikiti
    • Tulasi Ram Das G
    2018-02-09
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i1.8.9449
  • Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator (PMSG), Sinusoidal Pulse Width Modulation (SPWM), Space Vector Modulation (SVM), Voltage Oriented Control (VOC), Wind Energy Conversion Systems (WECS).
  • This paper presents the comparison of dynamic performance and steady state operation of PMSG wind energy conversion systems with two modulation techniques. Voltage oriented control (VOC) is used for grid-connected converter along with sinusoidal pulse width modulation (SPWM) and Space Vector Modulation (SVM) schemes. The generator is controlled by using zero d- axis current (ZDC) control scheme along with optimal torque control (OTC). Performance comparison with two pulse width modulation schemes through simulation results are presented for 2MW/ 690V/ 9.75Hz Non-Salient Pole PMSG using MATLAB/SIMULINK.

  • References

    1. [1] Bin Wu, Yongqiang Lang, Navid Zargari, Samir Kouroi. Power Conversion and control of Wind Energy Systems. Wiley, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118029008.

      [2] Carrasco J M, L. G. Franquelo, J. T. Bialasiewicz, S. S. Member, E. Galván, R. C. P. R. C. P. Guisado, M. Ãngeles, M. M. Prats, J. I. León, N. Moreno-alfonso, E. Galvan, M. Angeles, and J. I. Leon(2006). Power Electronic Systems for the Grid Integration of Renewable Energy Sources : A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 53(4), 1002–1016. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2006.878356.

      [3] Chen Z, J. M. Guerrero, F. Blaabjerg, and S. Member (2009). A Review of the State of the Art of Power Electronics for Wind Turbines. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 24(8), 1859–1875. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2009.2017082.

      [4] Chen Z and E. Spooner (1998). Wind Turbine Power Converters : a Comparative Study. Proceedings of IET 7th International Conference on Power Electronics and Variable Speed Drives, 456, 21–23. https://doi.org/10.1049/cp:19980572.

      [5] Chinchilla M, S. Arnaltes, and J. C. Burgos(2006) .Control of Permanent-Magnet Generators Applied to Variable-Speed Wind-Energy Systems Connected to the Grid. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 21(1), 130–135. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.2005.853735.

      [6] Dincer I (2000) .Renewable energy and sustainable development: a crucial review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 4(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-0321(99)00011-8.

      [7] Huang K H K, S. H. S. Huang, F. S. F. She, B. L. B. Luo, and L. C. L. Cai(2008).A control strategy for direct-drive permanent-magnet wind-power generator using back-to-back PWM converter.Proceedings of International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems, 2283–2288.

      [8] Sai I and B. Kumar (2016). Direct control technique for PMSG based Variable speed Wind Applications. Proceedings of International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT), 2543–2548.

      [9] Shubham Khandelwal and Ketan P Detroja(2017). Controlled Power Point Tracking for Autonomous Operation of PMSG based Wind Energy Conversion System. Proceedings of Indian Control Conference (ICC), https://doi.org/10.1109/INDIANCC.2017.7846478.

      [10] Sooraj Suresh Kumar,K Jayanthi and N Senthil Kumar(2016). Maximum Power Point Tracking For a PMSG Based Variable Speed Wind Energy Conversion System using Optimal Torque Control. Proceedings of IEEE International Conf. on Advanced Communication Control and Computing Technologies (ICACCCT), 347–352.

      [11] Venkata Yaramasu, B. Wu, P. C. Sen, S. Kouro, and M. Narimani(2015).High-Power Wind Energy Conversion Systems : State-of-the-Art and Emerging Technologies.Proceedings of IEEE,103(5), 740–788. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2014.2378692.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Pidikiti, T., & Ram Das G, T. (2018). Modelling and simulation of ZDC controlled PMSG based wind energy conversion system. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(1.8), 46-50. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i1.8.9449