Modeling factors for industry experts’ intention to participate in online scaffolding

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    The participation of industry experts in problem-based learning (PBL) activities helps in improving university students’ problem solving skills considering industry experts have more experiential knowledge. Online scaffolding, a form of assistance provided by industry experts via myriad use of ICT applications allows knowledge to be transcendent beyond the classroom boundaries is seen as an opportunity to improve deterioration of problem solving skills among university students. This study intends to investigate factors that may affect the intention of industry experts to provide structural empowerment of resources, information, support and opportunity for learning in online scaffolding. Modeling the right factors via the application of empowerment theory may help to improve understanding on factors that may motivate or hinder industry experts to provide the structural empowerment. Necessary national education policy can be formulated for higher education institutions (HEIs) prior inviting industry experts to be part in online PBL initiative. Based on existing literature, trust, ICT anxiety and perceived ease of use are identified as factors that may influence industry experts to provide structural empowerment.

     

     


  • Keywords


    Structural Empowerment; Trust; ICT Anxiety; Perceived Ease of Use; Online Scaffolding.

  • References


      [1] Majid, A, (2014). Pembelajaran tematik terpadu. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

      [2] Amichai-Hamburger, Y., McKenna, K. Y. A., & Tal, S. A. (2008). E-empowerment: Empowerment by the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1776–1789.

      [3] Avolio, J. (1998). Perceptions of empowering teaching behaviors and nursing students’ self-efficacy for professional nursing practice. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Western Ontario.

      [4] Bixler, B. A. (2007). The effects of scaffolding student's problem-solving process via question prompts on problem solving and intrinsic motivation in an online learning environment (Doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University).

      [5] Blueprint, M. E. (2013). Blueprint 2013–2025. Ministry of Education Malaysia.

      [6] Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS quarterly, 189-211.

      [7] Embi, M. A. (2011). E-Learning in Malaysian higher education institutions: Status, trends, & challenges. Department of Higher Education Ministry of Higher Education.

      [8] Fono, D., & Raynes-Goldie, K. (2005). Hyperfriendship and beyond: Friendship and social norms on Livejournal, Association of Internet Researchers (AOIR-6), and Chicago.

      [9] Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2003). Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 21-38.

      [10] Holton, D., & Clarke, D. (2006). Scaffolding and metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(2), 127–143.

      [11] Jin, S. A. A. (2012). “To disclose or not to disclose, that is the question”: A structural equation modeling approach to communication privacy management in e-health. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 69–77.

      [12] Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of engineering education, 95(2), 139-151.

      [13] Kanter, R.M. (1977). Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.

      [14] Hatcher, S., & Laschinger, H. K. (1995). Staff nurses' perceptions of job empowerment and level of burnout: a test of Kanter's theory of structural power in organizations. Canadian Journal of Nursing Administration, 9(2), 74-94.

      [15] Ledwell, E. A., Andrusyszyn, M. A., & Iwasiw, C. L. (2006). Nursing Students' Empowerment in Distance Education: Testing Kanter's Theory. Journal of distance education, 21(2), 78.

      [16] Marthandan, G., Jayashree, S., & Yelwa, H. (2013). Acquiring Key Competencies in Malaysia. In Proceedings of 23rd International Business Research Conference. Marriott Hotel, Melbourne, Australia.

      [17] Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of management review, 20(3), 709-734.

      [18] Mostelfelder., Al-sulaiti, A. S. (2015). Antecedents of Structural Empowerment and the Relationship between Structural Empowerment and Performance. Proceedings of the 9th Asia-Pacific Business Research Conference.

      [19] Neo, M., Neo, K. T. K., Tan, H. Y.-J., Kwok, W.-J., & Lai, C.-H. (2012). Problem-solving in a Multimedia Learning Environment: The MILE@HOME Project. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 26–33.

      [20] Pata, K., Sarapuu, T., & Lehtinen, E. (2005). Tutor scaffolding styles of dilemma solving in network-based role-play. Learning and Instruction, 15(6), 571-587.

      [21] Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of privacy. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.

      [22] Salter, M. B. (2013). Crowdsourcing: Student-Driven Learning Using Web 2.0 Technologies in an Introduction to Globalization. Journal of Political Science Education, 9(3), 362–365.

      [23] Salo, J., & Karjaluoto, H. (2007). A conceptual model of trust in the online environment. Online Information Review, 31(5), 604-621.

      [24] Savin-Baden, M. (2000). Problem-based learning in higher education: Untold stories. McGraw-Hill International.

      [25] Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 3.

      [26] Sinclair, B. (2000) Learner autonomy: The next phase? In B. Sinclair, I. McGrath and T. Lamb (eds.) Learner autonomy, teacher autonomy: Future directions. London: Longman. 4-14.

      [27] Siu, H. M., Laschinger, H. K. S., & Vingilis, E. (2005). The effect of problem-based learning on nursing students' perceptions of empowerment. Journal of nursing education, 44(10), 459-469.

      [28] Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465.

      [29] Van Raaij, E. M., & Schepers, J. J. (2008). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers & Education, 50(3), 838-852.

      [30] Wagner, J. I., Cummings, G., Smith, D. L., Olson, J., Anderson, L., & Warren, S. (2010). The relationship between structural empowerment and psychological empowerment for nurses: a systematic review. Journal of nursing management, 18(4), 448-462.

      [31] Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American journal of community psychology, 23(5), 581-599.


 

View

Download

Article ID: 29294
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i3.35.29294




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.