Post Graduate Business Education: Tracing through Different Learning Methods in Controversial Subjects Teaching

  • Authors

    • Dr. Meena J. Panikker
    • Dr. Muhamad Shafi
    2018-12-03
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.27541
  • Business, Government and Society, Cooperative Learning, Cognitivism, Education, Pluralism
  • ‘Business, Government and Society’ is one of the subjects for the Management curriculum at most of the B-Schools and the National Institute of Technology Calicut is also one such. The subject includes two components - business and government, and business and society; the teaching of this subject involves great challenges primarily due to the nature of the subject itself and also because of the diversity of the student group. The subject predominantly deals with:

    a) How the society influences the ethics of business.

    b) How the strategies of the government are linked with business.

    These issues need to be highlighted because India is a pluralistic society and hence the great variation in the degree of the awareness of the issues under discussion within the scope of this subject as well as the huge dissimilarity in their level of acceptance of certain elements pertaining to these issues, especially so, because they belong to the different communities. The students for the Management programme at the National Institute of Technology Calicut come from various communities across India. This study explores how the students respond to the different methods of learning namely, conventional learning, collaborative learning, and cooperative learning and also analyses which of these methods promote a healthy cognitivism in the students. The study was conducted among ten students (five from Kerala and five from non-Kerala) across five different batches over the years, 2012-2017. It was noted that through conventional learning there was hardly any change in the students’ personal ideologies which were often in conflict with the ideologies of the other students.  It was also noted that it was through collaborative and cooperative learning methods that the students were able to diffuse their personal political ideologies in the larger interests of the state. It was also noted that through the method of cooperative learning for the teaching of this subject, that the cognitive development in the students was encouraged. The relevance of including such a subject in the curriculum was thus established and the goals of teaching the subject were also fulfilled because it helped in creating better student awareness and also traced a better way for the students to arrive at solutions for the problems concerned.

     

     
  • References

    1. [1] Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, 1998, p. 57 as quoted in Badri, Al Said, “Teaching Controversial Issues in the Classroomâ€, CERJ 5(1).

      [2] http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-35650616, accessed on 19.10.2017

      [3] Parthasarathy, “India’s Cultural Plural its Best Defenceâ€, 05 Nov, 2009, http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/Indiarsquoscultural-pluralism-its-best-defence/article16890340.ece

      [4] Philippott, S. et al. Controversial issues: To teach or not to teach? That is the

      [5] question! The Georgia Social Studies Journal, 2011: 1.1, pp. 32â€44

      [6] Hess, D. (2005). How do teachers political views influence teaching about controversial issues? Social Education 69 (Jan/Feb) 47â€48.

      [7] Westheimer, J. (2008). On the relationship between political and moral engagement. In F. Oser & Citizenship Education Research Journal (CERJ), 5(1)83 W. Veugelers (Eds.), Getting involved: Global citizenship development and the sources of moral values (pp.17-30). Rotterdam: Sense.

      [8] Law Commission of India (2002) 182nd Report

      [9] Gazette of India (2013) Ministry of Law, Govt. of India, The Right To Fair Compensation And Transparency In Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation And Resettlement Act, 2013.

      [10] Drew Stewart (2010) Revisiting The Great Transformation: Tata’s Entry and Exit in West Bengal, pp 12-17, London School of Economics and Political Sciences.

      [11] Banerjee, Abhijit Vinayak. et. al, (, 2007 ) Beyond Nandigram: Industrialisation in West Bengal

      [12] Economic and Political Weekly p;1487 (April 28)

      [13] Anusha Chari, Madhav Raghavanhttp (2011) Foreign Direct Investment in India’s Retail Bazaar: Opportunities and Challenges, http://www.unc.edu/~achari/retail.pdf accessed on 19 Oct 2017.

      [14] Donovan Linley, (2011) Merger Remedies and the Walmart-Massmart case, Econex Trade Competition and Applied Economics, Research Note and Competition Tribunal, Walmart Decision, 29 June 2011, paragraph 99.

      [15] Dunlosky, John, et.al. Improving Students’ Learning With

      [16] Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and

      [17] Educational Psychology, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2013: 14(1) 4–58 p. 7

      [18] Prince, Michael. Does Active Learning Work: A Review of the Research, Journal of Engineering Education. 93(3), 223-231 (2004), pp. 4-5.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Meena J. Panikker, D., & Muhamad Shafi, D. (2018). Post Graduate Business Education: Tracing through Different Learning Methods in Controversial Subjects Teaching. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.38), 768-772. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.27541