Using Online Learning Systems to Measure Students’ Basic Teaching Skill

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract

    The purpose of this article is to find out the achievement of the nine basic skills of teaching students through a scientific approach at the Department of Elementary Education Teacher Education (PGSD) of the Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo and to find out the constraints found during learning through the scientific approach in the PGSD of Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo. The purpose of this research is to improve the achievement of nine basic skills of teaching students through a scientific approach at the PGSD department of Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo University. This research was conducted using classroom action research (CAR) methods. In each PTK cycle, namely cycle 1, cycle 2, and cycle 3 there are several activities carried out, which are design, action and observation, reflection, and revision. Nine basic teaching skills for students have increased from cycle I to cycle II, and from cycle II to cycle III. This is indicated by the increasing skills of conducting variation, strengthening skills, and conducting evaluation skills.


  • Keywords

    Online learning systems, teaching skills, seesaw class

  • References

      [1] R. J. Shavelson, “What Is The Basic Teaching Skill ?,” J. Teach. Educ., pp. 144–151, 1973.

      [2] S. Shoffa, Keterampilan Dasar Mengajar. Jakarta: Mavendra Pers, 2017.

      [3] M. Kunter, U. Klusmann, J. Baumert, D. Richter, T. Voss, and A. Hachfeld, “Professional competence of teachers: Effect on instructional quality and student development,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 805–820, 2013.

      [4] J. E. Rockoff, B. A. Jacob, T. J. Kane, and D. O. Staiger, “Can you recognize an effective teacher when you recruit one?,” Educ. Financ. Policy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 43–74, 2011.

      [5] M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, and D. J. McIntyre, Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring question in changing contexts. New York: Manassas, 2008.

      [6] E. Monterroso and R. Escutia, “Education Inmersiva: ensenanza practica del derecho en 3D,” Rev. Comun. y Technol. emergentes, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 83–100, 2014.

      [7] L. Shear and A. Lasseter, Understanding the Implications of Online Learning for Educational Productivity. Washington DC: Cebter for Technology in Learning SRI International, 2012.

      [8] A. Biermann, J. Karbach, F. M. Spinath, and R. Brünken, “Investigating effects of the quality of fi eld experiences and personality on perceived teaching skills in German pre-service teachers for secondary schools,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 51, pp. 77–87, 2015.

      [9] M. Hicks, I. Reid, and R. George, “Enhacing on-line teaching: Designing responsive learning environment,” Int. J. Acad. Dev., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 143–151, 2001.

      [10] M. F. Amir, F. N. Hasanah, and H. Musthofa, “Interactive Multimedia Based Mathematics Problem Solving to Develop Student s ’ Reasoning,” Int. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 7, no. 2.14, pp. 272–276, 2018.

      [11] D. R. Garrison and H. Kanuka, “Blended learning : Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education,” Internet High. Educ., vol. 7, pp. 95–105, 2004.

      [12] L. Kirtman, “An Examination of Differences in Learning Outcomes Online Versus In-Class Courses :,” Issues Teach. Educ., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 103–116, 2009.

      [13] M. F. Amir, N. Fediyanto, C. Chotimah, and H. E. Rudiyanto, “Developing 3Dmetric Media Prototype through a Hypothetical Learning Trajector to Train Students Spatial Skill,” J. Adv. Res. Dyn. Control Syst., vol. 10, no. 02–Special Issue, pp. 1537–1542, 2018.

      [14] M. F. Amir, C. Chotimah, R. Afandi, H. E. Rudyanto, and I. Anshori, “Design Research Study : Investigation of Increasing Elementary Student ’ s Spatial Ability Using 3Dmetric,” J. Adv. Res. Dyn. Control Syst., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1707–1713, 2018.




Article ID: 27360
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i4.7.27360

Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.