Phenomenology of Collective Will in the Management of Shared Agricultural Land Plots

  • Authors

    • Victor Aleksandrovich Mayboroda
    2018-12-03
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24499
  • Agricultural land plot, Civil/legal society, Collective will, General meeting, Shared ownership.

  • This paper addresses the advent of a new stage in the development of relationships associated with the management of agricultural land plots that are in shared ownership. The social group that emerged based on principles of the initial privatization, which was characterized by value-based unity based on collective labor in agricultural production, has, in the course of time, been supplanted by a new type of owners – those not characterized by value-based unity. The method for managing a common property – through general meetings – remains the same. There has yet to be put in place a legal instrument for dealing with the socially inhomogeneous makeup of the owners group that would make it possible to form the collective will of general meetings in accordance with the objectives for managing a property, as the very inhomogeneity of the makeup precludes the possibility of unity of management objectives. In this situation, the phenomenon of collective will lacks proper legal protection from usurpation by an economically strong entity. In this regard, the author proposes carrying out a differentiation of the types of disputes and procedural methods for resolving those disputes.

     

     


     

  • References

    1. [1] Gray KJ & Gray SF (1998), The idea of property in land. In Bright S & Dewar JK (Eds.), Land law: Themes and perspectives (pp. 15–51). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

      [2] Lipski SA (2013), O razvitii federal'nogo zakonodatel'stva, reguliruyushchego oborot zemel' sel'skokhozyaistvennogo naznacheniya [On the development of federal legislation that will regulate dealings in agricultural land]. Agrarnoe i Zemel'noe Pravo 2, 81–86.

      [3] Lipski SA (2014), Pravovye aspekty oborota zemel' sel'skokhozyaistvennogo naznacheniya v postsovetskoi Rossii [Legal aspects of agricultural land turnover in post-Soviet Russia]. Zhurnal Rossiiskogo Prava 4, 12–19.

      [4] Nygh PE (1999), Autonomy in international contracts. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

      [5] Mayboroda VA (2018), Nasledovanie zemel'noi doli inostrannym grazhdaninom [The inheriting of a land allotment by foreign citizens]. Nasledstvennoe Pravo 3, 18–23.

      [6] Gray KJ & Gray SF (2005), Elements of land law (4th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

      [7] Otvet na vopros 5 v Obzore sudebnoi praktiki Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii za chetvertyi kvartal 2013 goda, utv. Prezidiumom Verkhovnogo Suda RF 4 iyunya 2014 g. [Answer to Question 5 in A Survey of Case Law at the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation from the Fourth Quarter of 2013 (enacted by the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on June 4, 2014)].

      [8] Lipski SA (2011), Pravovoi mekhanizm gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya rynochnogo oborota zemel' sel'skokhozyaistvennogo naznacheniya v sovremennoi Rossii: Osobennosti formirovaniya, tendentsii i perspektivy [The legal mechanism for government regulation of the market turnover of agricultural land plots in present-day Russia: Characteristics of formation, trends, and prospects]. Pravo i Ekonomika 12, 18–24.

      [9] Mayboroda VA (2015), Iz"yatie zemel'nykh uchastkov dlya publichnykh nuzhd [Seizure of land plots for public needs]. Pravovye Voprosy Nedvizhimosti, 1, 28–32.

      [10] Roth GH & Kindler P (2013), The spirit of corporate law: Core principles of corporate law in continental Europe. Munich, Germany: C.H. Beck.

      [11] Laptev VA (2016), Resheniya sobranii i sdelki: Pravovoi rezhim i otlichiya [Decisions by assemblies and deals: Legal treatment and differences]. Yurist 2, 30–37.

      [12] Filipenko NV (2017), O pravosub"ektnosti ob"edinenii grazhdan na primere praktiki Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF [On the legal standing of citizen associations through the example of case law at the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation]. Zakon 4, 141–150.

      [13] Yampol'skaya TsA & Shchiglik AI (1971), O ponyatii obshchestvennykh organizatsii v SSSR [On the concept of nongovernmental organizations in the USSR]. Voprosy teorii i istorii obshchestvennykh organizatsii [Issues related to the theory and history of nongovernmental organizations]. Moscow, USSR: Nauka.

      [14] Mayboroda VA (2015), O vozmozhnosti notarial'nogo udostovereniya reshenii dolevykh sobstvennikov zemel'nykh uchastkov sel'skokhozyaistvennogo naznacheniya [On the possibility of notarizing the decisions of part owners of agricultural land plots]. Sud'ya 12, 29–32.

      [15] Pound R (1922), An introduction to the philosophy of law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

      [16] Mayboroda VA (2016), Profilaktika zemel'nykh sporov kak element strategicheskogo planirovaniya razvitiya munitsipal'nogo raiona [Prevention of land disputes as an element of strategic planning of the development of a municipal district]. Munitsipal'naya Sluzhba: Pravovye Voprosy 4, 25–29.

      [17] Mayboroda VA (2015), Predostavlenie zemel' publichnoi sobstvennosti na osnove auktsiona [Auction-based provision of publicly owned land plots]. Yurist 19, 40–46.

      [18] Mayboroda VA (2015), Razvitie pravookhranitel'noi funktsii notariata v sdelkakh s zemel'nymi uchastkami [Cultivating the law-enforcement function of the notarial system within the context of deals with land plots]. Notarius 6, 41–44.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Aleksandrovich Mayboroda, V. (2018). Phenomenology of Collective Will in the Management of Shared Agricultural Land Plots. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.38), 351-354. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24499