On Inequality of Rights in Agricultural Land Privatization

  • Authors

    • Victor Aleksandrovich Mayboroda
    2018-12-03
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24497
  • Land privatization for agricultural use, Purchase of agricultural land, The right to lease a land plot.
  • The article examines the institution of agricultural land privatization. Considering the dynamics of modern legislation, considerable attention is paid to the historical overview of the development of regulatory developments in this institution. Currently, due to uncertain meaning of the term "privatization", the author emphasized its semantic content in regulating land relations in general and in connection with the turnover of agricultural land, in particular through the application of content analysis methods in normative materials. In addition, the land purchase was compared with certain provisions of foreign legal systems. The study has led to conclusions regarding the need for formation of independent law enforcement practices for privatization of agricultural land for agricultural use. The author suggests using this term if there is a regional norm on privatization. At the same time, if the regional legislation establishes the date for privatization commencement beyond an obvious planning horizon and does not allow the use of this particular institution, the author offers to transform public property into private using the institution to purchase land granted on a lease basis. The current application of the institute of public land privatization for agricultural use lacks the opposition of semantic burden of privatization to other forms of transformation of public possession into private property. The absence of such opposition in a law enforcement practice provides an opportunity for confusion of privatization and land purchase when considering specific disputes. Today, those participating in privatization, i.e. persons who can potentially purchase publicly owned lands, are in unequal conditions with regard to other methods of acquiring public lands, including through purchase in case of a bona fide rent. The study itself aims to understand the results of public land transformation into private land based on a priori provision on the need to form a competitive environment for the existence of various forms of ownership through economic regulation methods, avoiding the provision of legal advantages to individual forms of ownership.

     

     


     
  • References

    1. [1] Westermann HP, Gursky KH & Eickmann D (2011), Sachenrecht. Heidelberg.

      [2] Schwab KH & Prutting H (1999), Sachenrecht: ein Studienbuch. 28 Aufl. Munchen.

      [3] Clarke A & Kohler P (2005), Property Law: Commentary and Materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

      [4] Chistyakov OI (1994), Rossiiskoe zakonodatelstvo X-XX vekov: v 9 t. T. 9 Zakonodatelstvo epokhi burzhuazno-demokraticheskikh revolyutsii [Russian legislation of the 3-20th centuries: in 9 vol. V. 9 Legislation of the bourgeois-democratic revolutions era]. Moscow: Juridical Literature.

      [5] Malysheva AV (2017), Osnovaniya klassifikatsii sposobov privatizatsii zemelnykh uchastkov. [The grounds for classification of the land privatization methods]. Pravo i economika 11, 66-70.

      [6] Ikonitskaya IA (1999), Zemelnoe pravo Rossiiskoi Federatsii: teoriya i tendentsii razvitiya [Land law of the Russian Federation: theory and development trends]. Moscow: Izd-vo IGiP RAN.

      [7] Lisina NL & Crassov OI (2004), Pravovoi rezhim zemel poselenii: Uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie [Legal regime of the lands in settlements: Educational and practical guide]. Moscow: Delo.

      [8] Krassov OI (2000), Pravo chastnoi sobstvennosti na zemlyu [The right to private ownership of land]. Moscow: Norma.

      [9] Anisimov AP & Melikhov AI (2009), Konstitutsionno-pravovoe regulirovanie prava chastnoi sobstvennosti na zemelnye uchastki [Constitutional and legal regulation of the right of private ownership of land plots]. Volgograd: Master.

      [10] Keenan D (2008), Ireland within the Union 1800-1921. Xlibris Corporation.

      [11] Krassov OI (2007), Zemelnoe pravo Gosudarstva Izrail [Land law in Israel]. Ekologicheskoe pravo 3, 36-41.

      [12] Mayboroda VA (2018), Regulirovanie oborota zemel selskokhozyaistvennogo naznacheniya [Regulation of the agricultural lands turnover]. Moscow: Moskovskii Politekh.

      [13] Campbell D (2013), Legal Aspects of Alien Acquisition of Real Property. Springer Netherlands.

      [14] Mayboroda VA (2014), Arenda zemelnogo uchastka iz zemel gosudarstvennoi i munitsipalnoi sobstvennosti. [Rent of a land plot from the state and municipal property]. Gosudarstvennaya vlast i mestnoe samoupravlenie 12, 44-49.

      [15] Golosova SA (2003), Pravovoe regulirovanie arendy zemelnykh uchastkov: sootnoshenie norm grazhdanskogo i zemelnogo prava [Legal regulation of the lease of land plots: correlation of norms of civil and land law]. Notarius 2, 43-48.

      [16] Aleksandrov AD (2002), Novyi ZK RF ob arende, kuple-prodazhe i mene zemelnykh uchastkov [The new Land Code of the Russian Federation on lease, purchase and sale of land plots]. Yuridicheskii mir 1, 60-64.

      [17] Krassov OI (2007), Zemelnoe pravo Gosudarstva Izrail [Land law in Israel]. Ekologicheskoe pravo 3, 36-41.

      [18] Erofeev BV (2012), Zemelnoe pravo: uchebnik dlya vuzov [Land law: textbook for high schools]. Moscow: OOO "Profobrazovanie".

      [19] Ryzhenkov AYa & Chernomorets AE (2005), Ocherki teorii prava sobstvennosti: proshloe i nastoyashchee [Essays on the theory of property law: past and present]. Volgograd: Izdatelstvo "Panorama".

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Aleksandrovich Mayboroda, V. (2018). On Inequality of Rights in Agricultural Land Privatization. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.38), 342-346. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24497