Methodological Basis of the Theoretical and Legal Research of Integration Processes in Modern States

  • Authors

    • Irina Nikolaevna Klyukovskaya
    • Evgeny Yurievich Cherkashin
    • Roman Ruslanovich Gabrilyan
    • Viktor Yegorovich Semenov
    • Ruslan Kurmanovich Melekayev
    2018-12-03
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24478
  • Integration processes, new globalism, international relations, world-system theory, conflicts, sovereignty, international law.

  • This article specifies theoretical globalization-related problems that require more detailed and scrupulous consideration. The study defines the objectivity of teleological processes, factors affecting their course and forms established under their influence. The authors analyze methodological proofs of global integration processes in the modern world. Using dialectical, historical-legal and comparative-legal research methods, the authors have determined circumstances forming various types of globalization, ways to resolve globalization-caused conflicts through the common-cause factor (optimization through the recognition and declaration of goals and their underlying values) or the institutional system of formal and actual dominants that structures the international hierarchy of states and defines power poles.

    The scientific novelty of this study consists in the analysis of objective globalization-related problems regardless of propagandist and ideological stereotypes from the viewpoint of scientific pragmatism and formal-logical rules.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Tikhomirov YuA (2002), Globalizatsiya: Vzaimovliyanie vnutrennego i mezhdunarodnogo prava [Globalization: the mutual influence of inner and international law]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava, 11, pp: 3-12.

      [2] Seidov AV (2004), Vozdeistvie globalizatsii na kontseptsiyu gosudarstvennogo suvereniteta v mezhdunarodnom prave [The influence of globalization on the concept of state sovereignty in international law]: Extended abstract of dissertation for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences. Moscow.

      [3] Andreev AL (2017), Globalnyi mir i etnicheskaya revolyutsiya [Global world and ethnic revolution]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny, 4(140),
      pp: 23-36, doi: 10.14515/monitoring.2017.4.03.

      [4] Sklair L (2001), Transnational capitalist class. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 145 p.

      [5] Fortune Global500, available online: http://fortune.com/global500/, last visit: 30.10.2018.

      [6] Nersesyants VS (1999), Obshchaya teoriya prava i gosudarstva [The general theory of law and state]: Student’s book for juridical universities and faculties. Moscow, Norma, 552 p.

      [7] Nersesyants VS (2005), Protsessy universalizatsii prava i gosudarstva v globalnom mire [The universalization of law and state in a global world]. Gosudarstvo i pravo, 5, pp: 40.

      [8] Blishchenko VI (eds) (2004), Moscow Legal Forum “Globalization, state, law, the 21st centuryâ€: forum proceedings. Moscow, Gorodets-izdat, 240 p.

      [9] Klyukovskaya IN, Demchenko TI, Gabrilyan RR, Kardanova AK, Popova LA (2017), Legal Conflicts Resolution in Customary Law of Peoples of the World. Man in India, 97(22), pp: 243-258.

      [10] Marochkin SB (1998), Deistvie norm mezhdunarodnogo prava v pravovoi sisteme Rossiiskom Federatsii [Functioning of international law norms in the legal system of the Russian Federation]: Extended abstract of dissertation for a Doctor Degree in Law Sciences. Yekaterinburg.

      [11] Tveryakova EA (2002), Yuridicheskaya ekspansiya: teoretiko-istoricheskoe issledovanie [Juridical expansion: theoretical and historical research]: Extended abstract of dissertation for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences. Nizhny Novgorod.

      [12] Frank AG (1979), Dependent Accumulation. NYU Press.

      [13] Hopkins TK, Wallerstein IM (1982), World-systems analysis: theory and methodology (Vol. 1). Sage Publications Inc.

      [14] Samir A (1976), L’impérialisme et le développement inégal. Paris, Édition de Minuit.

      Arrighi G, Hopkins TK, Wallerstein IM, Vecchi B (1989), Antisystemic movements. London: Verso

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Nikolaevna Klyukovskaya, I., Yurievich Cherkashin, E., Ruslanovich Gabrilyan, R., Yegorovich Semenov, V., & Kurmanovich Melekayev, R. (2018). Methodological Basis of the Theoretical and Legal Research of Integration Processes in Modern States. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.38), 261-264. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24478