Insult as a Linguistic and Legal Phenomenon

  • Authors

    • Olga Nikolaevna Ivanishcheva
    • Elena Viktorovna Bolgova
    • Irina Mikhailovna Shadrina
    • Anna Vladimirovna Gushchina
    • Sergey Borisovich Nikonov
    2018-12-03
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24447
  • Insult, Linguist’s competence, Obscene vocabulary.
  • In the article, on the material of the texts of linguistic expertise on cases of insult, the main problems and ways of their solution in conducting forensic linguistic expertise of a case of insult in the courtroom are presented. It was stated that when conducting linguistic expertise of conflicting statements, it is not a verbal strategy of achieving the result that matters, but an attack on a person's honor, dignity, and business reputation. The need to include extralinguistic and pragmatic factors in the attention of linguistics expert is emphasized: the focus of insult on a particular person, gestures and the indication of part-of-speech characteristics of the analyzed word.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Kusov GV (2004), Oskorblenie kak illokutivnyi lingvokulturnyi kontsept: dis. … kand. filol. nauk [Insult as an Illocutive Linguocultural Concept (Ph.D. Thesis)]. Krasnodar.

      [2] Speranskaya AN (1999), Oskorblenie slovom v obydennom i pravovom soznanii nositelei russkogo yazyka [Insulting with Words in Ordinary and Legal Consciousness of Russian Native Speakers]. Barnaul: ASU Publishing House, Yurislingvistika-1: Problemy i perspektivy, 89-95.

      [3] Chernyshova TV (2014), Filologicheskie aspekty russkoi pravovoi kultury (na materiale rechevogo akta oskorbleniya) [Philological Aspects of Russian Legal Culture (Based on the Speech Act of Insult)]. Problemy istorii, filologii, kultury, 3(45), 389-391.

      [4] Araeva, LA & Osadchii MA (2006), Problemy sudebno-lingvisticheskoi ekspertizy v ramkakh del o zashchite chesti i dostoinstva, o klevete i oskorblenii [Problems of Forensic Linguistic Expertise within the Framework of Cases of Protection of Honor and Dignity, Libel and Insult]. Rossiiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal, 2, 86-94.

      [5] Baranov AN & Vinogradov VV, Lingvisticheskaya ekspertiza teksta: teoreticheskie osnovaniya i praktika: ucheb. posobie [Linguistic Expertise of the Text: Theoretical Grounds and Practice: Training Manual] (2nd ed.). Moscow: Flinta, Nauka, 2009.

      [6] Ivanenko GS (2016), Oskorblenie kak polidiskursivnyi i polifunktsionalnyi fenomen [Insult as a Polydiscursive and Polyfunctional Phenomenon]. Meteor-Siti, 1, 72-74.

      [7] Izotova TM, Kuznetsov VO & Plotnikova AM (2016), Metodika provedeniya sudebnoi lingvisticheskoi ekspertizy po delam ob oskorblenii [Methodology of Forensic Linguistic Expertise in Cases of Insult]. Teoriya i praktika sudebnoi ekspertizy, 1(41), 92-98.

      [8] Podkatilina ML (2016), Sudebnaya lingvisticheskaya ekspertiza po delam ob oskorblenii [Forensic Linguistic Expertise in Insult Cases]. Izvestiya Tulskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, 3-2, 389-394.

      [9] Kuznetsov SA (2000), Bolshoi tolkovyi slovar russkogo yazyka [Big Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian language]. St. Petersburg: Norint.

      [10] Khimik VV (2004), Bolshoi slovar russkoi razgovornoi ekspressivnoi rechi [The Big Dictionary of the Russian Colloquial Expressive Speech]. St. Petersburg: Norint, 27.

      [11] Mokienko VM & Nikitina TG (2000), Bolshoi slovar russkogo zhargona: 25000 slov. 7000 ustoichivykh sochetanii [Big Dictionary of Russian Jargon: 25,000 Words. 7,000 Fixed Expressions]. St. Petersburg: Norint.

      [12] Zhukov VP (2004), Slovar russkikh poslovits i pogovorok [Dictionary of Russian Proverbs and Sayings] (11th ed.). Moscow: Russkii yazyk; Media.

      [13] Grigorieva SA, Grigoriev NV & Kreidlin GE (2001), Slovar yazyka russkikh zhestov [Dictionary of the Language of Russian Gestures]. Moscow: Yazyli russkoi kultury; Vienna: Wiener Slawistiscer Almanach.

      [14] Issers O (1999), Svoboda slova: dve storony medali (oskorblenie v zerkale yurisprudentsii i lingvistiki) [Freedom of Speech: Two Sides of the Medal (Insult in the Mirror of Jurisprudence and Linguistics)]. Barnaul: ASU Publishing House, Yurislingvistika-1: Problemy i perspektivy, 108-124.

      [15] Gridina TA & Tretyakova VS (2002), Printsipy lingvokognitivnogo analiza konfliktnogo vyskazyvaniya [Principles of the Linguistic Cognitive Analysis of a Conflicting Utterance]. Barnaul: ASU Publishing House, Yurislingvistika-3: Problemy yurislingvisticheskoi ekspertizy, 55-64.

      [16] Gorbanevsky MV (2006), Kak provesti lingvisticheskuyu ekspertizu spornogo teksta? Pamyatka dlya sudei, yuristov SMI, advokatov, prokurorov, sledovatelei, doznavatelei i ekspertov [How to Conduct Linguistic Expertise of a Contentious Text? Memo for Judges, Media Lawyers, Attorneys, Prosecutors, Investigators, Investigating Officers and Experts]. Moscow: Yuridicheskii mir.

      [17] Orlova OV (2002), K voprosu o roli kommunikativnogo podkhoda v lingvisticheskoi ekspertize [On the Role of the Communicative Approach in Linguistic Expertise]. Barnaul: ASU Publishing House, Yurislingvistika-3: Problemy yurislingvisticheskoi ekspertizy, 65-71.

      [18] Pachina AN (2015), Leksicheskii aspekt ponyatiya "oskorblenie": k voprosu o sredstvakh yazykovogo vyrazheniya oskorbleniya [Lexical Aspect of the Concept "Insult": On the Means of Linguistic Expression of Insult]. In Aktualnye voprosy izucheniya yazyka, literatury i zhurnalistiki: Materialy X Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii 24-26 noyabrya 2015 g. [Relevant Issues of Studying the Language, Literature and Journalism: Materials of the 10th International Scientific and Practical Conference held on November 24-26, 2015]. Abakan: FSBEU HPE "N.F. Katanov Khakas State University", 142-145.

      [19] Shabanov MM (2010), Osobennosti provedeniya sudebnoi lingvisticheskoi ekspertizy po delam ob oskorblenii [Peculiarities of Carrying out Forensic Linguistic Expertise in Insult Cases]. Vestnik Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2: Obshchestvennye nauki, 2, 175-179.

      [20] Golev ND (2002), Aktualnye problemy yurislingvisticheskoi ekspertizy [Acute Problems of Forensic Linguistic Expertise]. Barnaul: ASU Publishing House, Yurislingvistika-3: Problemy yurislingvisticheskoi ekspertizy, 5-13.

      [21] Kaplenko VN, Invektivnost otkrytaya i skrytaya [Open and Hidden Invectivity]. Barnaul: ASU Publishing House, Yurislingvistika-3: Problemy yurislingvisticheskoi ekspertizy, 71-76.

      [22] Sypchenko SV (2000), O tipakh invektivnykh tekstov kak obekte lingvisticheskoi ekspertizy problema [On the Types of Invective Texts as an Object of Linguistic Expertise]. Barnaul: ASU Publishing House, Yurislingvistika-2: Russkii yazyk v ego estestvennom i yuridicheskom bytii, 213-220.

      [23] Brinev KI (2014), Sudebnaya lingvisticheskaya ekspertiza: metodologiya i metodika: monografiya [Forensic Linguistic Expertise: Methodology and Methods: Monograph]. Moscow: Flinta, Nauka.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Nikolaevna Ivanishcheva, O., Viktorovna Bolgova, E., Mikhailovna Shadrina, I., Vladimirovna Gushchina, A., & Borisovich Nikonov, S. (2018). Insult as a Linguistic and Legal Phenomenon. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.38), 216-219. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24447