Contributing Factors to Science Achievement in TIMSS Malaysia: Direct Model and Indirect Model

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    The purpose of this study is to examine the extent to which home context, classroom context and school context influence students' science achievement in Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2011. This study involved a total of 5733 respondents from 180 secondary schools in Malaysia based on TIMSS 2011 data. Random sampling using two stage stratified cluster sampling technique was done in selecting the sample. This study also proposes a model containing two exogenous constructs which are parental involvement and school discipline as well as two endogenous constructs which are attitudes towards science and science achievement. This study used structural equation modeling (SEM) technique to test the direct model, indirect model and to determine the strength of the relationship between one variable with another variable. The findings showed that parental involvement has a direct effect on students' attitudes toward science and students' science achievement while the student attitudes towards science have a negative relationship towards students' science achievement.


  • Keywords


    Attitudes; Disciplinary; Parental Involvement; Science Achievement and TIMSS

  • References


      [1] Preuschoff AC (2011), Using TIMSS and PIRLS to construct global indicators of effective environments for learning: Boston College.

      [2] Howie S & Plomp T (2005), TIMSS-Mathematics findings from National and International Perspectives: In search of explanations. Educational research and evaluation 11, 101-106.

      [3] Mullis IV, Martin MO, Foy P & Arora A (2012), TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics: ERIC.

      [4] Martin MO, & Mullis IVS (2006), TIMSS: Purpose and Design. In S. J. Howie & T. Plomp (Eds.), Contexts of learning mathematics and science: Lessons learned from TIMSS Routledge, 17.

      [5] Martin MO, Mullis IV, Foy P & Stanco (2012), TIMSS 2011 International Results in Science: ERIC.

      [6] Jeynes W (2012), A meta-analysis of the efficacy of different types of parental involvement programs for urban students. Urban education 47, 706-742.

      [7] Jeynes WH (2016), A meta-analysis: The relationship between parental involvement and African American school outcomes. Journal of Black Studies 47, 195-216.

      [8] Zhao H & Akiba M (2009), School expectations for parental involvement and student mathematics achievement: A comparative study of middle schools in the US and South Korea. Compare 39, 411-428.

      [9] Colgate O, Ginns P & Bagnall N (2017), The role of invitations to parents in the completion of a child’s home reading challenge. Educational Psychology 37, 298-311.

      [10] Harris A & Goodall J (2008), Do parents know they matter? Engaging all parents in learning. Educational research 50, 277-289.

      [11] Jeynes WH (2007), The relationship between parental involvement and urban secondary school student academic achievement: A meta-analysis, Urban education 42, 82-110.

      [12] Pahic T, Vidovic VV & Miljevic-Ridicki R (2011), Involvement of Roma parents in children’s education in Croatia: A comparative study. Journal of research in international education 10, 275-292.

      [13] Moè A, Katz I & Alesi M (2018), Scaffolding for motivation by parents, and child homework motivations and emotions: Effects of a training programme. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 323-344.

      [14] Núñez JC, Epstein JL, Suárez N, Rosário P, Vallejo G & Valle A (2017), How do student prior achievement and homework behaviors relate to perceived parental involvement in homework?. Frontiers in psychology 8.

      [15] Gregory A, Cornell D, Fan X, Sheras P, Shih TH & Huang F (2010), Authoritative school discipline: High school practices associated with lower bullying and victimization, Journal of Educational Psychology 102, 483.

      [16] Gerlinger J & Wo JC (2016), Preventing school bullying: Should schools prioritize an authoritative school discipline approach over security measures?. Journal of school violence 15, 133-157.

      [17] Kapa R & Gimbert B (2018), Job satisfaction, school rule enforcement, and teacher victimization. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 29, 150-168.

      [18] Kyalo KD, Kanori E & Njagi LW (2017), Influence of Student Councils’ Involvement as a Link of Communication between Students and Administration on Students Discipline in Public Secondary Schools in Kathonzweni Sub-County, Kenya. Journal of Education 1, 47-55.

      [19] Fruiht VM (2015), Supportive others in the lives of college students and their relevance to hope. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice 17, 64-87.

      [20] Jia Y, Konold TR & Cornell D (2016), Authoritative school climate and high school dropout rates. School Psychology Quarterly 31, 289.

      [21] Berg JK & Cornell D (2016), Authoritative school climate, aggression toward teachers, and teacher distress in middle school. School psychology quarterly 31, 122.

      [22] Wang W, Vaillancourt T, Brittain HL, McDougall P, Krygsman A, Smith D & Hymel S (2014), School climate, peer victimization, and academic achievement: Results from a multi-informant study. School Psychology Quarterly 29, 360.

      [23] Murphy S (2018), The Impact of School Disadvantage on Senior Secondary Science: a Study of Patterns of Participation and Achievement in Government Secondary Schools in Victoria, Australia. Research in Science Education, 1-16.

      [24] Kennedy JP, Lyons T & Quinn F (2014), The continuing decline of science and mathematics enrolments in Australian high schools, Teaching Science 60, 34-46.

      [25] Dündar Ş, Güvendir MA, Kocabıyık OO & Papatga E (2014), Which elementary school subjects are the most likeable, most important, and the easiest? Why?: A study of science and technology, mathematics, social studies, and Turkish. Educational Research and Reviews 9, 417-428.

      [26] Han S, Capraro R & Capraro MM (2015), How science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) project-based learning (PBL) affects high, middle, and low achievers differently: The impact of student factors on achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 13, 1089-1113.

      [27] Byrne BM (2016), Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming: Routledge.

      [28] Hair J, Black W, Babin B, Anderson R & Tatham R (2013), Multivariate Data Analysis: Pearson Education Limited.

      [29] Schermelleh-engel K, Moosbrugger H & Müller H (2003), Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models : Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online 8, 23–74.

      [30] Foy P & Joncas M (2000), TIMSS sample design, TIMSS 1999 technical report 27.

      [31] Olson JF, Martin MO & Mullis IV (2008), TIMSS 2007 technical report: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.

      [32] Loehlin JC (2004), Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural equation analysis: Psychology Press.

      [33] Burnham KP & Anderson DR (2003), Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach: Springer Science & Business Media.

      [34] Tabachnick BG & Fidell LS (2007), Using multivariate statistics: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.

      [35] Browne MW & Cudeck R (1992), Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological methods & research 21, 230-258, 1992.

      [36] Boonk L, Gijselaers HJ, Ritzen H & Brand-Gruwel S (2018), A review of the relationship between parental involvement indicators and academic achievement. Educational Research Review 24, 10-30.

      [37] Gonida EN & Cortina KS (2014), Parental involvement in homework: Relations with parent and student achievement‐related motivational beliefs and achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology 84, 376-396.

      [38] Zhang D, Hsu HY, Kwok OM, Benz M & Bowman-Perrott L (2011), The impact of basic-level parent engagements on student achievement: Patterns associated with race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status (SES). Journal of Disability Policy Studies 22, 28-39.

      [39] Suizzo MA, Pahlke E, Yarnell L, Chen KY & Romero S (2014), Home-based parental involvement in young children’s learning across US ethnic groups: Cultural models of academic socialization. Journal of Family Issues 35, 254-287.

      [40] Yong M & Rahman AA (2014), Kompetensi Dimiliki Guru Pelatih Prasekolah Di Institut Pendidikan Guru, in International Education Postgraduate Seminar 2014, 808.

      [41] Uzun NB, Gelbal S & Ogretmen U (2010), Modeling The Relationship Between TIMSS-R Science Achievement and Affective Characteristics and Comparing the Model According to Gender., Kastamonu Education Journal 18, 531–544.

      [42] Ismail ME, Samsudin MA & Zain ANM (2014), A Multilevel Study on Trends in Malaysian Secondary School Students? Science Attitude: Evidence from TIMSS 2011. International Journal of Asian Social Science 4, 572-584.

      [43] Kirkpatrick R & Zang Y (2011), The negative influences of exam-oriented education on Chinese high school students: Backwash from classroom to child, Language testing in Asia 1, 36.

      [44] Jaber LZ & Hammer D (2016), Learning to feel like a scientist. Science Education 100, 189-220.

      [45] Stevens S, Andrade R & Page M (2016), Motivating young native American students to pursue STEM learning through a culturally relevant science program. Journal of Science Education and Technology 25, 947-960.

      [46] J Osborne, Simon S & Collins S (2003), Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education 25, 1049–1079.


 

View

Download

Article ID: 22354
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i4.30.22354




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.