Effects of Screw and Plate Positions in the Dual Plating of Distal Humerus Fixation

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    Bone fractures are one of the common effects of road accident. Osteosynthesis is a surgical procedure to treat the fractures of the bones by inserting implant to restore the fracture bones to its original position and immobilizing the restored region to allow proper growth of bone. One of the main problems of an internal fixation surgery is the ability of implants to retain the original position of humerus bone without any other complications during the fractured bone development. Thus, the purposes of the study was to analyze the biomechanical effects of screw and plate positioning at the distal humerus bone. The static analysis is carried out to evaluate the effect of mechanical characteristics and stress distribution in the humerus bone by using computational design and analysis software (CATIA) and Materialise Interactive Medical Image Control System (MIMICS) software. Thus, the analysis resulted to stress/strain distributions and displacement of the humerus bone and dual plate implant respectively. Different positioning of screws shows more significant results compared to positioning of dual locking plate regarding to the stress distribution and displacement of locking plate implant which can lead to disturbance towards the growth of bone.

     

     


  • Keywords


    Screw and Plate Positions, Dual Plating Fixation, Stress distribution, Displacement, Finite Element Analysis

  • References


      [1] Markus Windolf, Edgardo Ramos Maza, Boyko Gueorguiev & Volker Braunstein (2010), “Treatment of Distal Humeral Fractures Using Conventional Implants. Biomechanical Evaluation Of A New Implant Configuration”, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Vol.11, pp. 172.

      [2] Tim Taylor (October 2012), “HUMERUS”, innerbody.com, Retrieved from: http://www.innerbody.com/image_skelfov/skel19_new.html#continued.

      [3] Felippa, C. A. (2004), “FEM Modeling: Mesh,Loads and Boundary Conditions” Introduction To Finite Element, https://www.colorado.edu/engineering/CAS/courses.d/IFEM.d/IFEM.Ch07.d/IFEM.Ch07.pdf.

      [4] Richard L. Drake, A Wayne Vogl & Adam W.M.Mitchell (2009), “Anatomy for Students. Churchill Livingstone”, Elsevier.

      [5] Shawn W. O’Driscoll (May 2013), “Distal Humerus Fractures: How to Achieve Successful Fixation”, Retrieved from URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZUoMYtR-7o

      [6] Elise F.Morgan, George L.Barnes (2008), “Osteoporosis (Third Edition)”, Vol 1, pp. 3-25

      [7] Steinemann S. (2006), “Metal for craniomaxillofacial internal fixation implants and its physiologic implications”. In: Greenberg A, Prein J, editor. Craniomaxillofacial Reconstructive and Corrective Bone Surgery. New York, pp. 107–112

      [8] Steinmann S G, Eulenberger J, Mausli P A, & Schroeder A (1986), “Biological and Biomechanical Performance of Biomaterials”. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science.

      [9] Ata C. Atalar, Onur Tunalı, Ali Ers¸ Mehmet Kapıcıo, Yavuz S. & Mehmet S. Demirhan (2017), “Biomechanical comparison of orthogonal versus parallel double plating systems in intraarticular distal humerus fractures”, Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Vol.51, pp. 23-28.

      [10] Michael Hackl, Kilian Wegmanna, Soudad Taibah, Klaus Josef Burkhart, Martin Scaal & Lars Peter Mu¨ller (2015), “Peri-implant failure in dual plating of the distal humerus—A biomechanical analysis with regard to screw and plate positioning”, Injury, Vol 46, pp. 2142-2145.


 

View

Download

Article ID: 22151
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i4.26.22151




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.