Interaction Effects on Prediction of Children Weight at School Entry Using Model Averaging

  • Authors

    • Khuneswari Gopal Pillay
    • Sya Sya Syahira Muhammad Fitri Avtar
    • Mohd Asrul Affendi Abdullah
  • AICC, BIC, Interaction, Model Averaging, Model Selection
  • Model selection introduce uncertainty to the model building process, therefore model averaging was introduced as an alternative to overcome the problem of underestimate of standards error in model selection. This research also focused on using selection criteria between Corrected Akaike's Information Criteria (AICC) and Bayesian Information Criteria (BIC) as weight for model averaging when involving interaction effects. Mean squared error of prediction (MSE(P)) was used in order to determine the best model for model averaging. Gateshead Millennium Study (GMS) data on children weight used to illustrate the comparison between AICC and BIC. The results showed that model selection criterion AICC performs better than BIC when there are small sample and large number of parameters included in the model. The presence of interaction variable in the model is not significant compared to the main factor variables due to the lower coefficient value of interaction variables. In conclusion, interaction variables give less information to the model as it coefficient value is lower than main factor.

  • References

    1. [1] Buckland TS, Burnham KP & Augustin NH (1997), Model selection: An integral part of inference. Biometrics 53(2), 603-618.

      [2] Burnham KP & Anderson DR, Model selection and multimodel inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. New York: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc, (2002).

      [3] Claeskens G & Hjort NL, Model selection and model averaging. Cambridge: University Press, (2008).

      [4] Clyde M & Edward IG (2004), Model uncertainty. Statistical Science 19(1), 81-94.

      [5] Hendry DF & Reade JJ (2005), Problems in model averaging with dummy variables, paper presented at Model Evaluation in Macroeconomics Workshop, University. of Oslo, Blindern, Norway.

      [6] Hjort NL & Claeskens G (2003), Frequentist model average estimators. Journal of the American Statistical Association 98, 879-945.

      [7] Kamil Barton (2016), MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package version 1.15.6. Retrieved from URL.

      [8] Khuneswari G, Model selection and model averaging in the presence of missing data. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom, (2015).

      [9] Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ & Neter J, Applied Linear Regression Models. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. (2008).

      [10] Mevik BH & Cederkvist HR (2004), Mean squared error of prediction (MSEP) estimates for principal component regression (PCR) and partial least squares regression (PLSR). Journal of Chemometrics 18(9), 422–429.

      [11] Sauerbrei W, Hollander N & Buchholz A (2008). Investigation about a screening step in model selection. Statistics and Computing 18(2), 195-208.

      [12] Schomaker M & Heumann C (2014), Model selection and model averaging after multiple imputation. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 71, 758-770.

      [13] Symonds MRE & Moussalli A (2011), A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike’s information criterion. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65(1), 13–21.

      [14] Wallach D & Goffinet B (1989), Mean squared error of prediction as a criterion for evaluating and comparing system models. Ecological Modelling 44, 299–306.

      [15] Wright MW, Cox KM, Sherriff A, Franco-Villoria M, Pearce MS, Adamson AJ and core team GMS (2011), To what extent do weight gain and eating avidity during infancy predict later adposity? Public Healthh Nutrition 15(4), 656-662.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Pillay, K. G., Avtar, S. S. S. M. F., & Abdullah, M. A. A. (2018). Interaction Effects on Prediction of Children Weight at School Entry Using Model Averaging. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.30), 205-208.