Guiding Principles to Foster Higher Order Thinking Skills in Teaching and Learning of Mathematics

  • Authors

    • Nor’ain Mohd Tajudin
    • Marzita Puteh
    • Mazlini Adnan
    2018-10-07
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.15.21445
  • Guiding principle, higher order thinking skills, mathematics teaching and learning, secondary school level.

  • Stepping into the new millennium, many societies around the world are engaging in serious and promising educational reforms. A holistic framework in the form of a comprehensive process of fostering higher order thinking skills (HOTS) in mathematics teaching and learning is needed to guide teachers in implementation suitable activities in the classroom. Therefore, this research is intended to develop a Guiding Principles of Fostering Higher Order Thinking Skills (GP-HOTS) in teaching and learning of mathematics for secondary school students. The sample of the study was 266 secondary mathematics teachers that were chosen using multilevel cluster sampling technique. An instrument namely the Fostering HOTS Questionnaire related to principles of fostering HOTS in teaching and learning of mathematics was used in this study. Data analyses involved the computation of face, content, reliability indices and validation of themes and items using factor analysis. The results showed that there are six principles of how teachers can foster HOTS in teaching and learning of mathematics namely practice of implementing assessment for learning optimally, practice of determining HOTS learning outcomes, practice of HOTS questioning strategies, practice of integrating Information, Communication and Technology, practice of active learning, and practice of developing habits of mind. These principles have satisfied level of content validity indices as well as revealed an excellent acceptable level of reliability index. The implication is that the developed GP-HOTS in this study can be used in enhancing teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching, hence creating futuristic minded students

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Ministry of Education. Malaysian Education Blue Print 2013-2015 , Putrajaya, Malaysia. Ministry of Education. (2013).

      [2] K. Elliott, Teacher Performance Appraisal: More about Performance or Development? Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 40, 9 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n9.6

      [3] M. Adnot, M., T. Dee, V. Katz, & J. Wyckoff, Teacher Turnover, Teacher Quality, and Student Achievement in DCPS (CEPA Working Paper No. 16-03). (2016). http://cepa.stanford.edu/wp16-03.

      [4] S. Ryan, Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: A Multilevel Analysis of Teacher Credentialization and Student Test Scores in California High Schools. McGill Sociological Review, 5, 1-18, (2016).

      [5] Nor’ain Mohd Tajudin & Chinnappan, M. The Link between Higher Order Thinking Skills, Representation and Concepts in Enhancing TIMSS Tasks. International Journal of Instruction, 9(2), 199-224, (2016).

      [6] Reckase, M. D, McCrory, R. Floden, R. E., Ferrini-Mundy, J., & Senk, S. L. A Multidimensional Assessment of Teachers’ Knowledge of Algebra for Teaching: Developing an Instrument and Supporting Valid Inferences. Educational Assessment, 20, 249–267, (2015).

      [7] Thompson, T. Mathematics Teachers’ Interpretation Of Higher-Order Thinking In Bloom’s Taxonomy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education. 3(2), (2008)

      [8] Nor’ain Mohd Tajudin, Marzita Puteh and Mazlini Adnan. Developing Themes of Guiding Principles to Foster Higher Order Thinking Skills in Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 6(4), 90-103, (2017)

      [9] Yee Mei Heong, Jailani Md Yunos, Widad Othman, Razali Hassan, &Tee Tze Kiong, The needs analysis of learning higher order thinking skills for generating ideas. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 197 – 203., (2012).

      [10] Nor’ain Mohd Tajudin, Marzita Puteh, Mazlini Adnan, Developing Themes of Guiding Principles to Foster Higher Order Thinking Skills in Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. 6(4), 90-103, (2017).

      [11] Creswell, R. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. USA: Sage Publications

      [12] MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample Size in Factor Analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84-99.

      [13] doi.org: 10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84

      [14] E. D. Polit, & C. T. Beck, The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health, 29, 489–497, (2006).

      [15] doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147

      [16] S. J. Coakes, & L. Seed, SPSS Version 14.0 for windows: Analysis without anguish. Milton: John Wiley & Sons, (2007).

      [17] J. F. Hair, W. C. Black W. C., B. J. Babin, & R. E. Anderson, Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, (2010).

      [18] D. Wiliam, Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree, (2011).

      [19] A. Ratner, & S. Epstein, Reading Math Students: Math Educators Understanding Their Students as Readers. Pembentangan Inaugural CUNY Education Conference, New York, New York. . (2009).

      [20] J. Emerson, J. Connections Made Through Higher Level Questioning. Master’s Thesis, University of Nebraska – Lincoln, (2010).

      [21] D. Wetzel, How to Encourage Critical Thinking in Science and Math. (2013).

      [22] http://www.teachscienceandmath.com/tag/higher-order-thinking-skills/

      [23] P. Berger, & S. Trexler, ). Choosing Web 2.0 tools for learnin).

      [24] J. Lever-Duffy, & J. B. McDonald, Teaching and learning with technology. (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson, (2011).

      [25] N. Protheroe, What Does Good Math Instruction Look Like? Principal, 7(1), 51-54, (2007)

      [26] Education Alliance Closing the Achievement Gap: Best Practices in Teaching Mathematics. Charleston, WV: The Education Alliance, (2006).

      [27] B. Miri, , B. C. David, & Z. Uri, Purposely Teaching for the Promotion of Higher-Order Thinking Skills: A Case of Critical Thinking. Research in Science Education, 37, 353-369. (2007)

      [28] M. Staples, & M. Truxaw, The Mathematics Discourse Learning Project: Fostering Higher Order Thinking and Academic Language in Urban Mathematics Classrooms, Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 3(1), 27-56, (2010)

      [29] M. Gordon, Mathematical habits of mind: Promoting students' thoughtful considerations. J. Curriculum Studies, 43(4), 457–469, (2011).

      [30] D. L. Ball, M. H. Thames, & G. Phelps, Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407, (2008

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Mohd Tajudin, N., Puteh, M., & Adnan, M. (2018). Guiding Principles to Foster Higher Order Thinking Skills in Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.15), 195-199. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.15.21445