Performance measure of satellite flying in coplanar and non-coplanar formation

  • Authors

    • Nor Affendy Yahya
    • Renuganth Varatharajoo
    • A Salahuddin M Harithuddin
    • Syaril Azrad
    2018-10-09
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.13.21331
  • Coverage overlap area, formation flying, multiple boundary overlap, projected circular orbit, swath width.
  • In order to fulfil specific mission objective demand, spacecraft performance can be further optimized by means of various methods or configurations. Like for instance, selection of orbit type and inclination with a periodically repeated ground track will ensure the high efficiency of ground target coverage be accomplished throughout the whole duration of mission. Unfortunately, a single monolithic satellite most often unable to accommodate the requirement solicitated by many multi background users. So, to deal with the issue, an alternative solution would be to operate a swarm of satellites flying in synchronized formation. In this paper, three satellites flying in co-planar and non-coplanar formation were simulated. Here, the resulting model of two deputy satellites operating in the same orbital plane but different phase angle moved along the orbit path while both still maintaining constant relative distance with the non-coplanar chief spacecraft throughout the whole orbit period were presented. The use of unique projected circular orbit (PCO) formation arrangement allows the assessment of some important performance measure parameters like average overlapping coverage area and optimum swath width coverage distance. For the determination of area on the surface of the Earth overlapped by three satellites, the analysis was done using the multiple boundary overlap condition. Parametric studies were conducted involving different formation distance and formation height to observe pattern variation of average total overlapping area and maximum coverage distance. Preliminary result showed that at a specific Earth central angle, the total overlapped area decreased substantially with the increased distance in formation. Height factor does not have significant influence in the total overlapped area variation due to constraint imposed on satellites operating in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) altitude regime. Results were tabulated using 3-dimensional graphs to study the relationships exist between multiple variables. Finally, conclusions were made based on our findings with regards to the performance of positioning satellites in such configuration.

     


  • References

    1. [1] Folta DC, Bordi F & Scolese C (1992), Considerations on formation flying separations for Earth observing satellite missions. Advances in Astronautical Sciences 79(2), 803-822

      [2] Folta DC, Bordi F & Scolese C (1991), Field of view location for formation flying polar orbiting missions. Advances in Astronautical Sciences 75(2), 949-965

      [3] Zhang G, Cao X & Mortari D (2016), Analytical approximate solutions to ground track adjustment for responsive space. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 52(3), 1366-1383

      [4] Zhang J, Li HY, Luo YZ & Tang GJ (2014), Effects of in-track maneuver on the ground track of near-circular orbits. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics 37, 1373-1378

      [5] Hughes S (1999), Formation Flying Performance Measures For Earth Pointing Missions. Master Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

      [6] Nadoushan MJ & Assadian N (2015), Repeat ground track orbit design with desired revisit time and optimal tilt. Journal of Aerospace Science and Technology 40, 200-208

      [7] Clohessy WH & Wiltshire RS (1960), Terminal guidance system for satellite rendezvous. Journal of the Aerospace Sciences 27(9), 653-658

      [8] Alfriend KT, Vadali SR, Gurfil P, How JP & Breger LS (2010), Spacecraft Formation Flying – Dynamics, Control and Navigation. Elsevier Ltd.

      [9] Wertz JR (2005), Coverage, responsiveness and accessibility for various ‘Responsive Orbits’. 3rd Responsive Space Conference

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Affendy Yahya, N., Varatharajoo, R., Salahuddin M Harithuddin, A., & Azrad, S. (2018). Performance measure of satellite flying in coplanar and non-coplanar formation. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.13), 66-70. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.13.21331