An Empirical Analysis of Significant Factors influencing Entrepreneurial Behavior in the Information Technology Industry

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    The purpose of the current empirical research paper is to study and comprehend the significant factors that influence the entrepreneurial behavior through a detailed survey among the key employees of the information technology (IT) industry. The data thus collected from the survey was examined through the method of Partial Least Squares (PLS) for evaluating the relationship among the constructs of the conceptual research model. The results of the current empirical research study reveal that entrepreneurship-institutional linkage has the strongest effect on entrepreneurial behavior, followed by role of outsourcing and nature of the industry. The hypothesized path relationships between significant factors and entrepreneurial behavior have been found to be statistically significant. The top management of the companies in the IT industry have to focus and provide more importance to the entrepreneurship-institutional linkages which plays a key role in developing entrepreneurial behavior among the employees and in due course lead to innovative products and services and the over-all development of the organization.     

     


  • Keywords


    entrepreneurial behavior; empirical research; entrepreneurship; information technology industry; outsourcing

  • References


      [1] Bird, B. J. (1989). Entrepreneurial behavior. Engineering Management Journal, 1(4), 37-40.

      [2] Foss, N.J. and Ishikawa, I. (2007), “Towards a dynamic resource-based view: insights from Austrian capital and entrepreneurship theory”, Organization Studies, Vol. 28 No.5, pp. 749-772.

      [3] Manimala, M.J., Gopal, M.V. and Sridhar, P. (2002), “Global entrepreneurship monitor: India report”, in. NS Raghavan Centre for Entrepreneurial Learning, Indian Institute of Management.

      [4] (Wikipedia, 2018). Information Technology Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_technology

      [5] Contractor, F.J. and Kundu, S. (2004), “The role of export-driven entrepreneurship in economic development: a comparison of software exports from India, China, and Taiwan”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 71 No. 8, pp. 799-822.

      [6] (2018). IT-BPM Industry on A Sustained Growth Path in FY 2017-18, NASSCOM. Retrieved from http://www.nasscom.in/press/it-bpm-industry-sustained-growth-path-fy-2017-18-digital-solutions-and-niche-segments-key

      [7] Saraswati, J. (2008), “The Indian IT industry and neoliberalism: the irony of a mythology”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 29 No. 6, pp. 1139-1152

      [8] Dossani, R. and Kenney, M. (2009), “Service provision for the global economy: the evolving Indian experience”, Review of Policy Research, Vol. 26 Nos 1/2, pp.77-104.

      [9] Sarma, M. and Krishna, V.V. (2010), “State and the software: public policies in the shaping of the Indian software sector”, The Service Industries Journal, Vol. 30 No.1, pp.25-42.

      [10] Verma, R. and Brennan, L. (2011), “The investment development path theory: evidence from India”, International Journal of Emerging Markets, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 74-89.

      [11] Brown, C. and Thornton, M. (2013), “How entrepreneurship theory created economics”, Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, Vol. 16 No. 4, p.401.

      [12] Mani, S. (2014), “Emergence of India as the world leader in computer and information services”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 49 No. 49, pp. 51-61.

      [13] Chlosta, S. (2016), “Methodological approaches towards context-sensitive entrepreneurship research”, in Welter, F. and Gartner, W.B. (Eds), A Research Agenda for Entrepreneurship and Context. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA, pp.109-119.

      [14] Wadhwani, D.R. (2016), “Entrepreneurship in historical context: using history to develop theory and understand process”, in Welter, F. and Gartner, W.B. (Eds), A Research Agenda for Entrepreneurship and Context, Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA, pp. 65-78.

      [15] Acs, Z.J., Desai, S. and Hessels, J. (2008), “Entrepreneurship, economic development and institutions”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 219-234.

      [16] Athreye, S.S. (2005b), “The Indian software industry and its evolving service capability”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 393-418.

      [17] Kedia, B.L., Mukherjee, D. and Lahiri, S. (2006), “Indian business groups: evolution and transformation”, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 559-577.

      [18] Sankalpa Bhattacharjee, Debkumar Chakrabarti, (2017) "The congruence of entrepreneurship and India’s excellence in information technology", Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, Vol. 10 Issue: 2, pp.159-184

      [19] Arora, A., Arunachalam, V.S., Asundi, J. and Fernandes, R. (2001), “The Indian software services industry”, Research Policy, Vol. 30 No. 8, pp. 1267-1287.

      [20] Coward, C. (2002), “Obstacles to developing an offshore IT-enabled services industry in Asia: the view from the US”, Center for Internet Studies, University of Washington.

      [21] Heeks, R. (2006), “Using competitive advantage theory to analyze IT sectors in developing countries: a software industry case analysis”, Information Technologies & International Development, Vol. 3 No.3, pp.5-34.

      [22] Khanna, T. and Palepu, K. (2004), “The evolution of concentrated ownership in India: broad patterns and a history of the Indian software industry”, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 10613, Cambridge, MA.

      [23] Vaidyanathan, G. (2008), “Technology parks in a developing country: the case of India”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 285-299.

      [24] Parthasarathy, B. (2010), “The computer software industry as a vehicle of late industrialization: lessons from the Indian case”, Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 247-270.

      [25] Kautonen, T., Van Gelderen, M., & Tornikoski, E. T. (2013). Predicting entrepreneurial behavior: a test of the theory of planned behavior. Applied Economics, 45(6), 697-707.

      [26] Bhattacharjee, S., & Chakrabarti, D. (2017). The congruence of entrepreneurship and India’s excellence in information technology. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 10(2).

      [27] Kirkley, W. W. (2016). Entrepreneurial behavior: the role of values. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 22(3), 290-328.

      [28] Abdullah, S. (2009). The transformation from entrepreneurship to technology entrepreneurship development in Malaysia: State-led initiatives. Journal of Chinese Entrepreneurship, 1(3), 240-247.

      [29] Hanelt, A., & Krup, H. (2015, May). Feed the Machine-An Empirical Investigation of the Impact of Openness in Innovation on IT Entrepreneurship. In ECIS.

      [30] Allinson, C. W., Chell, E., & Hayes, J. (2000). Intuition and entrepreneurial behaviour. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9(1), 31-43.

      [31] Van Grembergen, W., & De Haes, S. (2017, January). Introduction to IT Governance and Its Mechanisms Minitrack. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

      [32] Aubert, B. A., Houde, J. F., Rivard, S., & Patry, M. (2016). Determinants of contract completeness for information technology outsourcing. Information Technology and Management, 1-16.

      [33] Rivera, M. J. (2017). Leveraging innovation and intrapreneurship as a source for organizational growth. International Journal of Innovation Science, 9(2).

      [34] Widya-Hastuti, A., Talib, N. B. A., Wong, K. Y., & Mardani, A. (2016). The Role of Intrapreneurship for Sustainable Innovation through Process Innovation in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: A Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(3S).

      [35] Ng, J.C.Y. (2012), Graziadio Business Report, 15(3)

      [36] [36] Robert, F., Shoubaki, A. E., Lasch, F., & Dana, L. P. (2017). Linking types of ICT entrepreneurs to new firm survival. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 30(1), 110-146.

      [37] Ge, B., Sun, Y., Chen, Y., & Gao, Y. (2016). Opportunity exploitation and resource exploitation: An integrative growth model for entrepreneurship. Internet Research, 26(2), 498-528.

      [38] Kaltenecker, N., Hoerndlein, C., & Hess, T. (2015). The drivers of entrepreneurial intentions-an empirical study among information systems and computer science students. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 18(2), 39.

      [39] Kim, Y. J., Song, S., Sambamurthy, V., & Lee, Y. L. (2012). Entrepreneurship, knowledge integration capability, and firm performance: An empirical study. Information Systems Frontiers, 14(5), 1047-1060.

      [40] Lawler, J. P., & Joseph, A. (2010). A Financial Technology Entrepreneurship Program for Computer Science Students. In Proceedings of the Information Systems Educators Conference (ISECON) (Vol. 27, No. 1315, pp. 1-7).

      [41] Afsar, B., Badir, Y. F., Saeed, B. B., & Hafeez, S. (2017). Transformational and transactional leadership and employee’s entrepreneurial behavior in knowledge–intensive industries. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(2), 307-332.


 

View

Download

Article ID: 20898
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i4.10.20898




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.