Optimization of Micro Resistance Spot Welding Parameters to Maximum Load, Fracture Area, and Nugget Thickness on AA1100 Using Response Surface Method


  • Hakam Muzakki
  • Ario Sunar Baskoro
  • Gandjar Kiswanto
  • Winarto .




Micro Resistance Spot Welding, Optimization, Response Surface Method


An improvement of micro welding technology is needed to support assembly of small components. The parameters of the micro resistance spot welding (µRSW) lead to welding quality such as maximum load, fracture area, and nugget thickness, some of welding quality parameters. There are not many researchers studying the welding quality of µRSW. This study aims to optimize welding parameters into maximum load, fracture area, and nugget thickness. The optimization of welding parameters used the response surface method (RSM). The highest value of maximum load 276.8 N could be achieved when welding current and welding time are 2 kA and 1 CT. The welding time on 1CT and welding current on around 1.5 kA can optimize to obtain the maximum load 200 N. 1 CT welding time or more and welding current near 3 kA result more 8 mm2 of fracture area. The thinnest and the thickest of the nugget were 0.553 mm when 1.5 CT of the welding time and 2 kA of welding current, and 0.790 mm when the welding time on 0.5 CT and welding current 1 kA. The value of nugget thickness optimize when the welding current between 1.5 kA and 0.5 kA, the magnitude of welding time less than 1 CT.



[1] Wang, J., et al., Analysis of Al-steel resistance spot welding process by developing a fully coupled multi-physics simulation model, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2015. 89: p. 1061–1072.

[2] Baskoro, A. S., et al., Effects of welding time and welding current to weld nugget and shear load on electircal resistance welding of cold rolled sheet for body construction, Proceeding of The second international conference on electrical verhicular technology IEEE, 24-24 November 2014.

[3] Papaefthymioua, S., et al., Micro-friction stir welding of titan zinc sheets, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2015. 216: p. 133–139.

[4] Baskoro, A. S., et al., Effects of high speed tool rotation in micro friction stir spot welding of aluminum A1100, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014. 493: p. 739-742.

[5] Baskoro, A. S., et al., The effect of welding time and welding currents on weld nugget and tensile properties of thin aluminum A1100 by micro resistance spot welding, ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2016. 11: p. 1050-1055.

[6] Nam, Y. S., et al., Enhancing surface layer properties of an aircraft aluminum alloy by shotpeening using response surface methodology, Materials & Design, 2015. 83: p. 566–576.

[7] Wang, W., et al., Optimization of laser-assisted glass frit bonding process by response surface methodology, Optics & Laser Technology, 2016. 77: p. 111-115.

[8] Kianersi, D., et al., Resistance spot welding joints of AISI 316L austenitic stainless steel sheets: Phase transformations, mechanical properties and microstructure characterizations, Materials and Design, 2014. 61: p. 251-263.

[9] Wan, X., et al., Modelling the effect of welding current on resistance spot welding of DP600 steel, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2014. 214: p. 2723–2729.

[10] Baskoro, A. S., et al., Effects of welding parameters in micro friction stir lap welding of aluminum A1100, Advanced Materials Research, 2013. 789: p. 356-359.

[11] Baskoro, A. S., et al., Effects of micro resistance spot welding parameters on the quality of weld joints on aluminum thin plate AA 1100, International Journal of Technology, 2017. 7: p. 1306-1313.

[12] Kadaganchi, R., et al., Optimization of process parameters of aluminum alloy AA 2014-T6 friction stir welds by response surface methodology, Defence Technology, 2015. 11, p. 209-219.

View Full Article: