Adjusted-Program-Budget Marginal-Analysis for Student Development Activity Planning and Budget Allocation

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    Setting priorities and making decisions on allocation and reallocation of university resources based on the direction of the university as translated in its strategic plan must be executed with transparency and accountability and will be of great importance. It is becoming even more crucial, particularly for universities in Malaysia with the recent budget cut imposed by the Malaysian government. In this paper, we proposed an implementation of Program-Budget Marginal-Analysis (PBMA) which is currently being employed for strategic budget planning in the health industry to be applied for the university strategic budget plan as part of the overall strategic planning process. Firstly, the similarities between the steps in PBMA with the steps involved in planning and executing the university strategic plan were studied. Next, the existing PBMA was adjusted and modeled to suit the needs of the steps involved in selecting and allocating budget for the students of U-ABC’s 2017 development activities. The outcome of this implementation using 0-1 integer programming model showed that the targeted achievements could be realized within the allocated budget that was provided by the university. This adjusted-PBMA will be useful and suitable to be implemented by organizations with key performance indicator-oriented programs and having limited budget allocation issues.

     


  • Keywords


    Adjusted-PBMA, student-activity planning, university budget allocation, 0-1 IP.

  • References


      [1] K.J. Smith, A. R. Wateska, M. P. Nowalk, M. Raymund, B. Y. Lee, and R. K. Zimmerman, “Modeling of cost effectiveness of pneumococcal conjugate vaccination strategies in U.S. older adults,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 373-381, 2013.

      [2] M. A. Z. Knoll, “The role of behavioral economics and behavioral decision making in American’s retirement savings decisions,” Society Security Bulletin, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 1-23, 2010.

      [3] P. Brambleby and R. Fordham, “What is PBMA?” 2003, http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/painres/download/whatis/pbma.pdf, accessed on 17 April 2016.

      [4] P. Brambleby and R. Fordham, “Implementing PBMA,” 2003, http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/painres/download/whatis/ pbmaimp.pdf, accessed on 15 April 2016.

      [5] J. Polisena, K. Tran, and K. Cimon,” Home telehealth for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of Telemed Telecare, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 120–127, 2010.

      [6] C. Mitton, F. Dionne, and C. Donaldson, “Managing healthcare budgets in times of austerity: the role of program budgeting and marginal analysis,” Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 95-102, 2014.

      [7] K. E. Hinton, “ A Practical Guide to Strategic Planning in Higher Education, Society for College and University Planning,” 2012, http://oira.cortland.edu/webpage/planningandassessmentresources/planningresources/SCPGuideonPlanning.pdf, accessed on 27 July 2016.

      [8] S. Petren, K. Bjerklin, L. A. Marke, and L. Bondemark, “Early correction of posterior crossbite - a cost-minimization analysis,” European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 35, pp. 14–21, 2013.

      [9] C. A. F. Drugs and T. I. Health, “Guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies: Canada 2006, Ottawa,” 2014, http://cadth. ca/media/pdf/186_EconomicGuidelines_e. pdf, accessed on 11 June 2016.

      [10] F.G. Uctug and E. Yukseltan, “A linear programming approach to household energy conservation: Efficient allocation of budget,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 49, pp. 200–208, 2012.


 

View

Download

Article ID: 18731
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i3.20.18731




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.