Pedagogical Technologies in Legal Education: Historical Analysis and Modern Experience

  • Authors

    • Evgenia Sagalaeva
    • Irina Komarevceva
    • Olga Landina
    • Marina Melnichuk
    2018-08-13
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.15.18695
  • legal education, pedagogic, pedagogical technologies.

  • The article is dedicated to research and analysis of the issues of formation and development of pedagogical technologies in legal education. The historical experience of training of legal human resources both in Russia and in foreign countries is investigated. Special attention is paid to the enchiridia of M. Psellus. The theoretical and practical problems that affect the application of pedagogical technologies in legal education at the present stage are analyzed. The potential of problematic training in the context of legal education is revealed. The scientific novelty of the work is that the authors on the basis of studying the history of the formation and development of pedagogical technologies both in Russia and abroad attempted to determine the main trends in the development of this sphere of social relations and to justify the most constructive proposals in order to improve the training of graduate lawyers.

     

  • References

    1. [1] N.A. Solovyeva, Kompetentnostnyi podkhod v yuridicheskom obrazovanii: problemy i perspektivy [Competence Approach in Legal Education: Problems and Prospects], Vestnik VolGU, Seriya 6 14 (2013) 43.

      [2] M.L. Davydova, Obuchenie yuridicheskoi professii v Rossii i SShA: k voprosu ob universalnykh osnovaniyakh [Training for the Legal Profession in Russia and the USA: To the Issue of Universal Foundations], Pravo i sovremennye gosudarstva 2 (2013) 33.

      [3] D.A. Shigal. Teoriya istoriko-pravovogo sravnitelnogo metoda [Theory of the Historical-Legal Comparative Method]. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/teoriya-istoriko-pravovogo-sravnitelnogo-metoda. Revised 2013. Accessed July 6, 2018.

      [4] Zh.-N. Robert, Rim [Rome], Moscow, 2006, pp. 333-334.

      [5] M. Grant, Rimlyane. Tsivilizatsiya Drevnego Rima [The Romans. Civilization of Ancient Rome], Moscow, 2005, p. 98.

      [6] K.M. Levitan, Yuridicheskaya pedagogika: uchebnik [Legal Pedagogy: Textbook], Moscow, 95-100.

      [7] N.I. Sokurova, Individualnyi podkhod kak unikalnyi stil obucheniya v kontekste gumanisticheskikh paradigmalnykh orientatsii obrazovaniya Srednevekovya [Individual Approach as a Unique Style of Training in the Context of Humanistic Paradigm Orientations of Middle Ages’ Education], Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii 12 (2014) 27.

      [8] V.V. Zakharov, Modernizatsiya yuridicheskogo obrazovaniya v rossiiskikh universitetakh v seredine XIX stoletiya [Modernization of Legal Education at Russian Universities in the Middle of the 19th Century], Yuridicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka 4 (2003).

      [9] A.Ya. Vyshinsky, Osnovnye zadachi nauki Sovetskogo Sotsialisticheskogo prava [The Main Tasks of the Science of Soviet Socialist Law], Sovetskoe gosudarstvo 4 (1938) 39.

      [10] V.M. Shadrin, Teoreticheskaya yurisprudentsiya i yuridicheskoe obrazovanie v pervye gody sovetskoi vlasti [Theoretical Jurisprudence and Legal Education in the First Years of Soviet Power], Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta 27(281) (2012) 45-49.

      [11] B.N. Topornin, Vysshee yuridicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii: problemy razvitiya [Higher Legal Education in Russia: Problems of Development], Moscow, 1996, pp. 20-21.

      [12] A.Ya. Kodintsev, Zaochnoe yuridicheskoe obrazovanie v sisteme organov yustitsii SSSR v 30-e gody XX veka [The Extramural Legal Education in the System of Justice Agencies of the USSR in the 1930s], Nauchnye issledovaniya v obrazovanii 6 (2007) 74-79. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zaochnoe-yuridicheskoe-obrazovanie-v-sisteme-organov-yustitsii-sssr-v-30-e-gody-hh-veka. Revised 2007. Accessed July 6, 2018.

      [13] A.G. Kalpin, A.I. Maslyaev (eds.), Grazhdanskoe pravo. Chast pervaya: uchebnik [Civil Law. Part One: Textbook], Moscow, 2000, p. 41.

      [14] Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 26 maya 2009 g. “O merakh po povysheniyu kachestva yuridicheskogo obrazovaniya†[Decree of the President of the Russian Federation “On Measures to Improve the Quality of Legal Education†(May 26, 2009)]. RG. https://rg.ru/2009/05/29/uristy-dok.html. Revised May 29, 2009. Accessed July 6, 2018.

      [15] E. Posner, The Real Problem with Law Schools. Slate. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/view_from_chicago/2013/04/the_real_problem_with_law_schools_too_many_lawyers.html. Revised April 2, 2013. Accessed July 6, 2018.

      [16] I.Yu. Troitskaya, Tekhnologii aktivnogo obucheniya kak sredstvo razvitiya poznavatelnoi motivatsii u studentov [Technologies of Active Learning as a Means of Developing Cognitive Motivation among Students], European Journal of Education and Applied Psychology 2 (2017) 30-32.

      [17] V.Ya. Kikot, A.M. Stolyarenko (eds.), Yuridicheskaya pedagogika: ucheb. dlya stud. vuzov, obuch. po spets. 021100 “Yurisprudentsiya†[Legal Pedagogics: Textbook for Students of Universities, Training in Specialty 021100 “Jurisprudenceâ€], UNITY: Zakon i parvo, Moscow, 2004.

      [18] J. Weinstein, L.H. Morton, Stuck in a Rut: The Role of Creative Thinking in Problem Solving and Legal Education. Scholarly Commons. https://scholarlycommons.law.cwsl.edu/fs/139/. Accessed July 6, 2018.

      [19] T.V. Larkina, Tekhnologiya problemnogo obucheniya v professionalnoi podgotovke budushchikh spetsialistov [Technology of Problem Training in the Professional Training of Future Specialists], Vector nauki TGU 1(8) (2012) 198.

      [20] E.F. Tomina, Realizatsiya refleksivnoi kontseptsii Dzh. Dyui v sovremennoi vysshei shkole [Implementation of the Reflexive Concept of J. Dewey in the Modern Higher School], Gumanitarnye nauki, Pedagogika 2(18) (2011) 121.

      [21] M.I. Makhmutov, Problemnoe obuchenie: osnovnye voprosy teorii [Problematic Training: Basic Issues of Theory], Moscow, 1975.

      [22] T.S. Kupavtsev, E.V. Malchenkov, Ispolzovanie metoda problemnogo obucheniya v uchebno-vospitatel'nom protsesse VUZa MVD Rossii kak sredstvo aktivizatsii samosovershenstvovaniya kursantov i slushatelei [The Use of the Method of Problematic Training in the Educational Process of the University of Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs as a Means of Activating the Self-Improvement of Cadets and Listeners], Uchenye zapiski 9 (2008) 35.

      [23] S.N. Medvedev, M.P. Melnikova, M.A. Bichko, S.N. Ivahnenko, V.A. Schegolkov, Possession: Historical and Legal Study in light of RF Civil Code Improvement, Man in India 96(10) (2016) 4119-4127.

      [24] M.I. Tsapko, I.V. Mukhachev, A.S. Gondarenko, N.A. Tkacheva, O.V. Pogozheva, Institutional Changes in the Electoral System in the Contemporary Russia in Light of the Parliamentary Elections in 2016: Methodological, Legal and Doctrinal Aspect, Man in India 96(10) (2016) 3869-3878.

      [25] D.A. Smirnov, K.A. Strus, General Scientific Analysis of Implementation of Principles of Law in the Contemporary Russian Legal Basis, Indian Journal of Science and Technology 8(S10) (2015). DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2015/v8iS10/84867.

      [26] O.V. Moreva, Pedagogicheskie paradigmy: opyt sistematizatsii [Pedagogical Paradigms: Experience in Systematization], Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta 2 (2004). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pedagogicheskie-paradigmy-opyt-sistematizatsii. Revised 2004 .Accessed July 6, 2018.

      [27] D. Segal. What They Don’t Teach Law Students: Lawyering. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/20/business/after-law-school-associates-learn-to-be-lawyers.html. Revised November 19, 2011. Accessed July 6, 2018.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Sagalaeva, E., Komarevceva, I., Landina, O., & Melnichuk, M. (2018). Pedagogical Technologies in Legal Education: Historical Analysis and Modern Experience. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.15), 309-313. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.15.18695