The Reuse Process of OSS Components
Keywords:OSS, Open Source Software, Component, Reuse, Process, Evaluation
In recent years, OSS has been expanding globally, with the advantage of being able to avoid adverse consequences of proprietary software monopolies, and to reduce the budget and procedures for maintenance and upgrades. This can serve as a good opportunity to prevent the monopoly of large corporations and establish a balanced industrial structure through fair competition. despite the many advantages of OSS, we are having difficulties in using OSS due to several reasons. To meet the functionality of the required software, leveraging open source is seen as an effective way to reduce costs and ensure quality. However, in the actual development process, it is difficult to select open source with proper function and quality, to analyze it, to change it, and to integrate it into the target system. In order to solve these problems, this study proposed the procedures and methods for identifying and selecting open source, and the efficient improvement and integration method through minimal modification.
 Kwei-Jay,L., Yi-Hsuan, L., Tung-Mei, K., Examining Open Source Software Licenses through the Creative Commons Licensing Model. Software Applications: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, 6 (2009), 2978-2990.
 Josh, L., Jean, T., The Scope of Open Source Licensing. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Volume 21, Issue 1, (2005), 20â€“56.
 Joseph, F., Brian, F., A framework analysis of the open source software development paradigm. ICIS '00 Proceedings of the twenty first international conference on Information systems, (2000), 58-69.
 OSD, â€œhttp://www.opensource.org/osd.htmlâ€
 International Institute of Infonomics University of Maastricht, The Netherlands and Berlecon Research GmbH Berlin. Germany Research, FINAL REPORT, (2002).
 Martin, F., The Business and Economics of Linux and Open Source. Prentice Hall PTR, (2002).
 MICHAEL, K., Commercializing Open Source Software. ACM Queue, vol.1, no.5, (2003), 51-55.
 Jean-Christophe, D., Simon, A., Comparing Assessment Methodologies for Free/Open Source Software: OpenBRR and QSOS, PROFES 2008, LNCS 5089, (2008), 189â€“203.
 Petrinja E., Sillitti A., Succi G., Comparing OpenBRR, QSOS, and OMM Assessment Models. In: Ã…gerfalk P., Boldyreff C., GonzÃ¡lez-Barahona J.M., Madey G.R., Noll J. (eds) Open Source Software: New Horizons. OSS 2010. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 319, (2010).
 Stol, KJ., Ali, M., A Comparison Framework for Open Source Software Evaluation Methods. In: Ã…gerfalk P., Boldyreff C., GonzÃ¡lez-Barahona J.M., Madey G.R., Noll J. (eds) Open Source Software: New Horizons. OSS 2010. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 319, (2010).
 Adewole, A, Sanjay, M., Nicholas, O., A Review of Models for Evaluating Quality in Open Source Software. IERI Procedia, Volume 4, (2013), 88-92.
 Cotugno, R., Messina, A., Adapting scrum to the italian army: methods and (open) tools. In: IFIP International Conference on Open Source Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, (2014), 61-69.
 Syahlie, K., Hypervisors assessment in education industry: Using OpenBRR methodology. In: Information, Communication Technology and System (ICTS), 2014 International Conference on. IEEE, (2014), 303-308.
 Zahoor, A., Mehboob, K., & Natha, S., Comparison of open source maturity models. Procedia computer science, 111 (2017), 348-354.
View Full Article:
How to Cite
LicenseAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under aÂ Creative Commons Attribution Licensethat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work''s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal''s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (SeeÂ The Effect of Open Access).