The Improvement of Inter-Firm Linkages Within Dormant Mse Cluster: a Case of East Java

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    The stagnant development of MSE clusters might be a priority concern of the government. It has been expected that such clusters need proper policies and regulations to well develop. In East Java, for instance, policies to improve inter-firm linkages within MSE cluster has been perceived as a vital effort to activate the dormant cluster. An effective inter-firm linkages will support the clustered MSEs to overcome their isolation problems so as to augment their productive capacity and enlarge output distribution. By taking the cluster of “Wisata Panci” in Pasuruan, East Java” as research object, this research revealed that inter-firm linkages are very beneficial for the advance development of the cluster. After suffering from financial crisis in 1998, the cluster succeeded to grow and develop to be active cluster.

    Methodologically, this research examined factors strengthening inter-firm linkages within the cluster by employing Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). In doing so, local government and cluster entrepreneurs were deeply interviewed to formulate policy choices related the strategies of inter-firm linkage improvement.

    The results of this research revealed that entrepreneurs within the cluster give more stressing on forward linkage improvement. Accordingly, horizontal linkage was ranked in second place. And finally, backward linkage was ranked in third place. This study concluded that both local government and entrepreneurs have same perception to more develop the cluster to be active MSEs cluster. It seems that forward linkage, especially consumptiom linkage, plays a vital role for this purpose as clustered MSEs commonly need an effective market channel to distribute their outputs widely. However, backward and horizontal linkages are also important as the linkages support further contribution to forward linkage and spur local business

     

     


  • Keywords


    Active cluster, AHP, dormant cluster, inter-firm linkages, small industry.

  • References


      [1] V.V. Mazur, K.A. Barmuta, S.S. Demin, E.A. Tikhomirov, M.A. Bykovskiy, Innovation Clusters: Advantages and Disadvantages. International Journal of Econo-mics and Fnancial Issues. Vol. 6. Special Issue (2016).

      [2] UNIDO, Cluster development for pro-poor growth: the UNIDO approach, The United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna, 2010.

      [3] T. Altenburg, J. Meyer-Stamer, How to Promote Clusters: Policy Experiences from Latin America, World Development, Vol. 27, No. 9 (1999) 1693–1713.

      [4] T.T. Tambunan, Development of Small and Medium-Scale Industry Clusters in Indonesia, KADIN Indonesia, http://www.kadin-indonesia.or.id/en/doc/opini, 2006.

      [5] A.K. Ҫelik, E. Talaş, A.I. Akbaba, A Sectoral Hirarchical Clustering of SMEs in Turkey with Respect to General Support Programs, Review of European Studies, Vol. 5, No. 5 (2013).

      [6] H. Schmitz, Collective Efficiency: Growth Path for Small Scale Industry, The Journal of Development Studies 31 (4), 1995.

      [7] R. Rabellotti, Collective Effects in Italian and Mexican Footwear Industrial Clusters, Small Business Economics 10 (1998) 243–262.

      [8] K. Nadvi, Collective Efficiency and Collective Failure: the Response of Sialkot Surgical Instrument Cluster to Global Quality Pressures, World Development Vol. 27, No. 9 (1999).

      [9] Y. , Linkage Formation by Small Firms: the Case of Rural Cluster in Indonesia, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies Vol. 36 No. 1 (2000) 137-166.

      [10] A. Hoetoro, Cooperation and Competition among Clustered MSEs in East Java, Gajahmada Inter-national Journal of Business, Vol. 16 No 3 (2014) 275-293.

      [11] H. Weijland, Microenterprise Clusters in Rural Indonesia: Industrial Seedbed and Policy Target, World Development Vol. 27, No. 9, (1999) 1515-1530.

      [12] M. Hossain, A review of literature on open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises, Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research 5:6, 2015.

      [13] K. Burger, D. Kameo, H. Sandee, Clustering of Small Agro-Processing Firms in Indonesia, Inter-national Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 2(3/4) (2001) 289-299.

      [14] T.T. Tambunan, Development of Rural Manufacturing SME Clusters in a developing Country: the Indonesian Case, Journal of Rural Development 31 (2008) 123-146.

      [15] Chaminade, C. J. Vang, Innovation Policy for Asian SMEs: Exploring Clusters Differences, WP 2006/3 (2006).

      [16] M. Zeinalnezhad, M. Mukhtar, S. Sahran, The Role of Clusters and Networks in Development of Industrial SMEs. International Conference on Business and Economics Research, vol 1. LACSIT Press, Kuala Lumpur, 2011.

      [17] S. Foghani, B. Mahadi, R. Omar, Promoting Clusters and Networks for Small and Medium Enterprises to Economic Development in the Globalization Era, SAGE Open. January-March 2017; 1-9.

      [18] H. Tiftik, M. Zincirkiran, Effect of Clustering Activities to Copmetitive Power in Terms of SME’s Innovative Management Approach, Journal of Alternative Perspec-tives in the Social Sciences, Volume 5 No. 3 (2013) 533-550.

      [19] H. Sandee, P. Rietveld, H. Supratikno, P. Yuwono, Promoting Small Scale and Cottage Industries in Indonesia: an Impact Analysis for Central Java. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Vol. 30, No. 3 (1994).

      [20] C. Fortin, Improving the Competitiveness of SMEs through Enhancing Productive Capacity, Pro-ceedings of UN Conference on Trade and Development. New York (2005).

      [21] Rawat, D, R.K. Mittal, V.S. Aggarwal, Networks with Cluster Stakeholders as a Business Strategy to Enhance Performance: A Conceptual Framework, Proceedings of International Conference in Volatile and Uncertain Environment for Emerging Markets. New Delhi, 2017.

      [22] Y. Cao, A survival analysis of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in central China and their determinants, African Journal of Business Management, Vol. 6 No.10 (2012) 3834-3850.

      [23] M. Irjayanti, A.M. Azis, Barrier Factors and Potential Solutions for Indonesian SMEs, Procedia Economics and Finance 4 (2012) 3-12.

      [24] S. Lemma, Subcontracting Strategy for the Ethiopian Micro and Small Enterprises, Study Report submitted to Ethio-German Micro and Small Enterprises Development Programme, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2001.

      [25] A.O. Miehlbradt, M. McVay, Implementing Sustainable Private Sector Develop-ment: Striving for Tangible Results for the Poor: The 2006 Reader, International Training Centre of the ILO, 2006.

      [26] F. Mazzola, S. Bruni, The role of linkages in firm performance: evidence from southern Italy. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 43 (2000) 199-221.

      [27] Li, Fung, Overview of the Industrial Clusters in China, Industrial cluster series, Issue 1. Li & Fung Research Centre, 2006.

      [28] R.W. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process–What it is and How it is Used, Mathl Modelling, Vol 9. No. 3-5 (1987) 161-176.

      [29] J. Franek, A. Kresta, Judgment scales and consistency measure in AHP, Procedia Economics and Finance 12, 2014; 164-173.

      [30] R.F.S.M. Russo, R. Camanho, Criteria in AHP: a Systematic Review in Literature, Procedia Computer Science 55 (2015): 1123-1132.

      [31] E. Triantaphllou, S.H. Mann, Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decision Making in Engineering Applications: Some Challenges. Inter’l Journal of Industrial Engineering and Practice, Vol. 2 No. 1 (1995) 35-44.

      [32] E. Ostorm, Collective Action and The Evolution of Social Norms, Journal of Economics Perspectives, Vol. 14 Number 3 (2000) 137-158.

      [33] IDS Policy Briefing. Collective Efficiency: a Way Forward for Small Firms. Issue 10, UK. Institute of Development Studies, 1997.

      [34] A. James, S. Gee, J.H. Love, S. Roper, J. Willis, Small firm-large firm relationships and the implications for small firm innovation: what do we know? ERC White Paper No. 9. www.enterpriseresearch. ac.uk, 2014.

      [35] M.L. Raposo, J.J.M. Ferreira, C.I. Fernandes, Local and cross-border SME cooperation: Effects on innovation and performance, Revista Europea de Direccion y Economia de la Empresa 23 (2014) 157-165.

      [36] OECD, Encouraging Linkages between Small and Medium Sized Companies and Multinational Enter-prises: an Overview of Good Policy Practice, OECD Investment Committee, France, 2005.

      [37] A. Szabό, Clustering for Competitiveness, In SME Clustering: Finding the Right Business Partners and Improving the Business Environment for SMEs, edited by Szabό and Dürkop, Konrad Adenauer Stiftung. Greece, 2016.

      [38] M. Rungtusanatham, F. Salvador, C. Forza, T.Y Choi, Supply-chain linkages and operational perfor-mance: A resource-based-view perspective, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 23, No. 9 (2003) 1084–1099.

      [39] UNIDO, Development of Clusters and Networks of SMEs, The United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna , 2001.

      [40] M. Ayyagari, Micro and Small Enterprises: Unexplored Pathways to Growth, MicroREPORT#63 (2006).

      [41] A. Hoetoro, Ekonomika Industri Kecil, UB-Press, Malang, 2017.

      Missing in References

      Ferragina and Mazzotta (2014) at page#2

      Missing in Document

      B. Jankowska, Cluster organization as a pro-internationalization form of cooperation in the SME sector – a Polish case in the European context. Journal of Economics and Management. Vol. 22 (4), 2015.

      Davis, C.H, D. Arthurs, E. Cassidy, D. Wolfe, What Indicators for Cluster Policies in the 21th Century? Paper presented for Blue Sky II, Ottawa, US (2006).

      Price, D.P, M. Stoica, R.J. Boncella, The relationship between innovation, knowledge, and perfromance in family and non-family firms: an analysis of SMEs. Journal of Innovation and Entrepre-neurship 2 (2013) 14.

      I. Makedos, The Collaboration of SMEs through Clusters as Defense againts Economic Crisis, Economics Research International, Article ID 407375, 2014.

      J. Hamdani, C. Wirawan, Open Innovation Implementation to Sustain Indonesian SMEs. Procedia Economics and Finance 4 (2012) 223-233.

      K. Nadvi, S. Barrientos, Industrial Clusters and Poverty Reduction towards a methodology for poverty and social impact assessment of cluster development initiatives, UNIDO, Vienna, 2004.

      M. Ganbold, The Impact of the Small and Medium Enterprise Support Programmes on the Livelihoods of Microentrepreneurs Using Sustainable Livelihood Framework: A Case Study of Enterprise Mongolia Project Phase 2 by United Nations Development Programme in Mongo-lia. Thesis. Massey University. New Zealand, 2016.

      M. Gὅbel, R. Vogel, C. Weber, Management Research on Reciprocity: A Review of the Literature, Business Research, Official Open Access Journal of VHB, Volume 6 Issue 1 (2013).

      M. Porter, Clusters and New Economics of Competition, Harvard Business Review, 76 (1998) 77-90.

      M.S. Freel, Sectoral patterns of small firm innovation, networking and proximity. Resrach Policy 32 (2003) 751-770.

      O. Mauroner, Innovation Clusters and Public Policy – The Case of a Research-Driven Cluster in Germany, American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 5 (2015) 736-747.

      P. Andersen, Bollingtoft, Cluster-based global firms’ use of local capabilities, Management Research Review, Vol. 34 No. 10 (2014) 1087-1106.

      P-A. Havnes, K. Senneseth, A Panel Study of Firm Growth among SMEs in Networks, Small Business Economics 16 (2001) 293-302.

      P. Ismalina, An integrated analysis of socioeconomic structures and actors in Indonesian industrial clusters. UMCG research database. University of Groningen, 2011.

      R. Baptista, P. Swann, Do firms in cluster innovate more? Research Policy 27 (1998).

      R.W. Gakure, P.N. Kimemia, G.A. Waititu, Influence of Subcontract Offering on the Performance of Manufacturing Micro and Small Enterprises in Kenya. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science. Volume 19 Issue 1 (2014) 37-46.

      S. Morse, N. McNamara, M. Acholo, Sustainable Livelihood Approach: A critical analysis of theory and practice, Geographical Paper No. 189, University of Reading, UK, 2009.


 

View

Download

Article ID: 18429
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18429




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.