Learners’ Perspective on Critical Factors to Cloud VLE Success: an Empirical Investigation

  • Authors

    • Rahimah K
    • A H Nor Aziati
    • Adnan H.B
    • Latipah N
    • Maizurah A
    2018-08-24
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18419
  • Technology Acceptance Model, MOODLE, Success Factor

  • The use of Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) in academic institutions is becoming an imperative for many institutions. The growth of the advanced education system now is depending on the increased of Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) technology utilization. Education institution communities are encouraged to adopt a variety of VLE technology to support the process of teaching and learning.  The objective of this research is to measure perspective of VLE acceptance among lecturers in the context of Moodle application by using data from 541 lecturers at selected Higher Education Institutions. A framework of research constructed based on a comprehensive study on the theory of service quality and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Eight factors hypothesized which consist of five independent variables; organization support, knowledge support, technical assistance, system characteristics and lecturer style and innovation, two belief variables; perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use and one dependent variable;  behavioral intention to use the VLE. All the factors were tested to determine whether they are important in influencing future use of the VLE and statistical analysis methods determined the key driving factors. Results of regression analysis showed that university lecturers have an above average level of VLE acceptance with the very high level of significant value.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Yoo SJ, Han SH, Huang W. The roles of intrinsic motivators and extrinsic motivators in promoting e-learning in the workplace: A case from South Korea. Comput Human Behav. 2012;28(3):942–50.

      [2] Mafenya PN. An investigation of first-year students ’ pedagogical readiness to e-learning and assessment in open and distance learning: An University of South Africa context. Mediterr J Soc Sci. 2013;4(13):353–60.

      [3] Turel V. The Use of Educational Technology at Tertiary Level. 2013;28(2):482–96.

      [4] M Gaebel, Veronika, Rita M EC. E-Learning in Europeean Higher Education Institution: Result od A Mapping Survey. EUA Publication 2014; 2014. 19-25 p.

      [5] Herman Dwi HD. The Evaluation of a Moodle Based Adaptive e-Learning System. Int J Inf Educ Technol. 2014;4(1):89–92.

      [6] Journal HU, Kil E. Determining the Factors of Affecting the Moodle Use by Using TAM . The Story of a University after a Destructive Earthquake *. 2014;29(October 2011):169–77.

      [7] Aypay A, Çelik HC, Aypay A, Sever M. Technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers in Turkey. Turkish Online J Educ Technol. 2012;11(4):264–72.

      [8] Tselios N, Daskalakis S, Papadopoulou M. Assessing the Acceptance of a Blended Learning University Course. Educ Technol Soc. 2011;14:224–35.

      [9] Indahyanti U. Jurnal Teknologi Full paper Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to Measure the Learning Management System Acceptance by Students of Politeknik Sakti Surabaya. 2015;4:127–31.

      [10] Teo T. Assessing e-learning acceptance by university students in Thailand. 2011;27:1356–68.

      [11] Gilakjani AP. Factors Contributing to Teachers ’ Use of Computer Technology in the Classroom. 2013;1(3):262–7.

      [12] Chaubey A, Bhattacharya DB. Learning Management System in Higher Education. Int J Scince Technol Eng. 2015;2(3):158–62.

      [13] Correia A. E-learning in English classroom : Investigating factors impacting on ESL ( English as Second Language ) college students ’ acceptance and use of the Modular Object- Oriented Dynamic Learning Environment ( Moodle ) by Jing Liu A thesis submitted to the gra. 2013;

      [14] Academic A, Nassuora AB. Students Acceptance of Mobile Learning for Higher Education in. Am Acad Sch Res J. 2012;4(2).

      [15] Reitze DD. Using cloud computing to enhance automatic test equipment testing and maintenance capabilities. AUTOTESTCON (Proceedings). 2013;80–5.

      [16] Alhomod S, Shafi MM. Success factors of E-learning projects: A technical perspective. Turkish Online J Educ Technol. 2013;12(2):247–53.

      [17] Cheawjindakarn B, Suwannatthachote P, Theeraroungchaisri A. Critical Success Factors for Online Distance Learning in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature. Creat Educ J [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2015 Aug 10];3(8):61–6. Available from: http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperDownload.aspx?DOI=10.4236/ce.2012.38B014

      [18] Zakaria E, Md Yusoff D. The Role Of Technology : Moodle As A Teaching Tool. Asian J Manag Sci Educ. 2013;2(4):46–52.

      [19] Rakers J, Sc D. Measuring Wireless Network Success : An Analysis of a University in Ohio. 2009;85–92.

      [20] Al-Busaidi K, Al-Shihi H. Instructors’ Acceptance of Learning Management Systems: A Theoretical Framework. Commun IBIMA [Internet]. 2010 Jan 1;2010:1–10. Available from: http://www.ibimapublishing.com/journals/CIBIMA/2010/862128/862128.html

      [21] Valsamidis S, Kazanidis I, Petasakis I, Kontogiannis S, Kolokitha E. E-Learning Activity Analysis. Procedia Econ Financ [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2015 Aug 10];9(Ebeec 2013):511–8. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2212567114000525

      [22] Talukder KI, Mubasshira T. Factors Affecting Student ’ S Perception And Actual Uses Of Lms In Malaysian Universities. 2018;2(1):397–408.

      [23] Ramayah T, Lee JWC. System characteristics, satisfaction and e-learning usage: A structural equation model (SEM). Turkish Online J Educ Technol. 2012;11(2):196–206.

      [24] Teo T. Modelling the Influences of Beliefs on Pre- Service Teachers ’ Attitudes Towards Computer Use. 2012;3(1):13–22.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    K, R., H Nor Aziati, A., H.B, A., N, L., & A, M. (2018). Learners’ Perspective on Critical Factors to Cloud VLE Success: an Empirical Investigation. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.30), 507-511. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18419