Principals’ Instructional Leadership towards Teachers' Self-Efficacy

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    Principals’ instructional leadership practices have proved to be an imperative predictor to teachers’ self-efficacy. Yet, educators are concerned about the ability to adapt to new instructional leaderships due to unspoken principal-teacher expectations. This paper discusses the extent of instructional leadership practices by two newly transferred principals at two different schools. The purpose of this quantitative study was to examine how their instructional leadership practices affected the self-efficacy of the teachers. Through the use of a cross-sectional survey, responses made by 64 teachers employed in one public school and one privately-run school, were compared. The Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale (PIMRS) Teacher Short Form and the Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale (TSES) were used for data collection. The findings showed a high level of instructional leadership practices and self-efficacy in both schools. The test results indicated a strong and positive relationship between the principals’ perceived instructional leadership practices and the teachers’ self-efficacy. Some of the details even suggested that newly transferred principals enforce specific school goals as their main agenda. Nevertheless, the areas of significance identified by this study may help district school superintendents develop the right knowledge to support newly transferred principals in their instructional leadership, thus enhancing teachers’ self-efficacy at the school level.

     

     


  • Keywords


    instructional leadership; public schools; principal; private schools; self-efficacy.

  • References


      [1] Quinn DM, Quinn DM. The impact of principal leadership behaviors on instructional practice and student engagement. 2006;

      [2] Hallinger P, Bryant DA. Accelerating knowledge production on educational leadership and management in East Asia: a strategic analysis. Sch Leadersh Manag. 2013;

      [3] Robinson VMJ, Lloyd C a., Rowe KJ. The Impact of Leadership on Student Outcomes: An Analysis of the Differential Effects of Leadership Types. Educ Adm Q. 2008;

      [4] Horner M. Leadership theory: Past, present and future. Team Perform Manag An Int J. 1997;

      [5] Avolio BJ. Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory-building. Am Psychol. 2007;

      [6] Allio RJ (2013). Leaders and leadership – many theories, but what advice is reliable? Strateg Leadersh. 2012;41:4–14.

      [7] Wahlstrom KL, Louis KS. How Teachers Experience Principal Leadership : The Roles of Professional Community , Trust , Efficacy , and Shared Responsibility. 2015;44(4):458–95.

      [8] Duyar I, Gumus S, Bellibas MS. Multilevel analysis of teacher work attitudes teacher collaboration. Int J Educ Manag. 2013;

      [9] Çalik T, Kilinç AÇ. Examination of Relationships between Instructional Leadership of School Principals and Self-Efficacy of Teachers and Collective Teacher Efficacy *. 2012;12(4):2498–505.

      [10] Ross JA, Gray P. School leadership and student achievement: The mediating effects of teacher beliefs. Can J Educ. 2006;

      [11] Bandura A. Self-efficacy : Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. 1977;84(2):191–215.

      [12] Tschannen-Moran M, Hoy AW, Hoy WK. Teacher Efficacy: Its Meaning and Measure. Rev Educ Res. 1998;

      [13] Hallinger P. Do beliefs make a difference ? Exploring how principal self-efficacy and instructional leadership impact teacher efficacy ... Do beliefs make a difference ? Exploring how principal self-efficacy and instructional. 2017;(May).

      [14] Brown GTL, Chai C, Brown GTL, Chai C. Assessing instructional leadership : a longitudinal study of new principals. 2012;

      [15] Tschannen-Moran M, Hoy AW. Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teach Teach Educ. 2001;

      [16] Bellibas MS, Liu Y. Multilevel analysis of the relationship between principals’ perceived practices of instructional leadership and teachers’ self-efficacy perceptions. J Educ Adm. 2017;

      [17] Hallinger P, Hosseingholizadeh R, Hashemi N, Kouhsari M. Do beliefs make a difference? Exploring how principal self-efficacy and instructional leadership impact teacher efficacy and commitment in Iran. Educ Manag Adm Leadersh. 2017;

      [18] Sehgal P, Nambudiri R, Mishra SK. Teacher effectiveness through self-efficacy, collaboration and principal leadership. Int J Educ Manag. 2017;

      [19] Pearce ML (Kennesaw state U. The Effects of Instructional Leadership on Teacher Efficacy. ProQuest Diss Theses. 2016;109.

      [20] Fancera SF, Bliss JR. Instructional leadership influence on collective teacher efficacy to improve school achievement. Leadersh Policy Sch. 2011;

      [21] Nir AE, Kranot N. School Principal’s Leadership Style and Teachers’ Self-Efficacy. Plan Chang. 2006;

      [22] Hallinger P, Wang WC, Chen CW, Li D. Assessing instructional leadership with the principal instructional management rating scale. Assessing Instructional Leadership with the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale. 2015.

      [23] Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A. & Hoy WK. Teacher Efficacy : Its Meaning and Measure Teacher Efficacy : Its Meaning and Measure. Rev Educ Res. 1998;

      [24] Hallinger P, Wang WC, Chen CW. Assessing the Measurement Properties of the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale: A Meta-Analysis of Reliability Studies. Educ Adm Q. 2013;

      [25] Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 1988.

      [26] Sun J, Leithwood K. Direction-setting school leadership practices: a meta-analytical review of evidence about their influence. Sch Eff Sch Improv. 2015;

      [27] Fisher Y. The timeline of self-efficacy : changes during the professional life cycle of school principals. 2014;

      [28] Goldring E, Huff J, May H, Camburn E. School context and individual characteristics: What influences principal practice? J Educ Adm. 2008;

      [29] Tschannen‐Moran M, McMaster P. Sources of Self‐Efficacy: Four Professional Development Formats and Their Relationship to Self‐Efficacy and Implementation of a New Teaching Strategy. Elem Sch J. 2009;

      [30] Stipek D. Context MattersEffects of Student Characteristics and Perceived Administrative and Parental Support on Teacher Self-Efficacy. Elem Sch J. 2012;

      [31] Platt E, Devore D, Mcintyre C, Simon L. Exploration of the Relationship Between Authentic and Transformational Leadership in Female Leaders A Dissertation by Irvine , California School of Education Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education in Org. 2015;(November).


 

View

Download

Article ID: 18349
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18349




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.