The “Ideal” TH Model Framework to Promote Knowledge Talent : a Malaysian Case

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    The Talent is viewed as a competitive issue. Meanwhile, Knowledge Talent is indeed required for shaping an innovative ecosystem sphere. Malaysia is still fighting the “Knowledge Talent” war due to the rising talent and skill gap between available graduates and industries’ demands.  Profound collaboration between the Government, University and Industry known as Triple Helix (TH) model has been highlighted as the main driver to fill this gap. Providing an exploration of the fundamental conditions and contextual sensitivity that hinder university-industry linkages, this paper suggest the ideal TH model framework to fill the gap and provide a solid basis by considering institutionalism perspective in the Malaysia context. The evolutionary perspective stipulates better understanding of overlay in communication and gap between the Government, University and Industry to reshape the Knowledge Talent pool systems to fill the gap in contributing to the transition of a hybrid TH culture-taking root.

     

     


  • Keywords


    Knowledge Talent; Innovation, Talent & Innovation; University-Industry Linkages; Triple Helix in Malaysia ; Scientific and Technical publications

  • References


      [1] GII. Effective innovation policies for development. Cornell University, INSEAD and WIPO Fontainebleau Ithaca and Geneva. 2017.

      [2] Rasiah R, Yap X-S. Innovation Performance of the Malaysia Economy. 2014.

      [3] Cooke P. Regional innovation, entrepreneurship and talent systems. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management. 2007;7(2-5):117-39.

      [4] IMD. IMD World Talent Report IMD World Competitveness Center. 2016.

      [5] NPSTI. NATIONAL POLICY ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION (NPSTI)

      2013 - 2020 Harnessing STI for Socio- Economic Transformation and Inclusive Growth. 2013.

      [6] Bank TW. Malaysia Economic Monitor. Boosting Trade Competitiveness. 2014.

      [7] Coad A, Pellegrino G, Savona M. Barriers to innovation and firm productivity. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 2016;25(3):321-34.

      [8] Muhammad Zeeshan Ahmad K, Ayub A, Qadar Baksh B. Importance of Talent Management in Business Strategy: A Critical Literature Review. Abasyn University Journal of Social Sciences. 2013;6(1):28-40.

      [9] Theodorakopoulos N, Bennett D, Sánchez Preciado DJ. Intermediation for technology diffusion and user innovation in a developing rural economy: A social learning perspective. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development. 2014;26(7-8):645-62.

      [10] Thornton G. Global Economy in 2013 : uncertainty weighing on growth. 2013.

      [11] Chow E. Filling the talent pipeline for the E&E sector. 2015.

      [12] Education MoH. Graduate Employability Blueprint 2012-2017. 2012.

      [13] Ranga M, Etzkowitz H. Triple Helix systems: an analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the Knowledge Society. Industry and Higher Education. 2013;27(4):237-62.

      [14] Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Res Policy. 2000;29.

      [15] Cai Y. What contextual factors shape ‘innovation in innovation’? Integration of insights from the Triple Helix and the institutional logics perspective. Social Science Information. 2015;54(3):299-326.

      [16] Whetten DA. An examination of the interface between context and theory applied to the study of Chinese organizations. Management and Organization Review. 2009;5(1):29-55.

      [17] Jerome LW. 1 Triple Helix Knowledge Clusters. Theory and Practice of the Triple Helix System in Developing Countries. 2011:9.

      [18] Etzkowitz H. The triple helix: university-industry-government innovation in action: Routledge; 2008.

      [19] Kamal EM, Flanagan R. Measuring The Impact Of Innovation On Sme Companies In Malaysian Construction Sector. 2009.

      [20] Malairaja C, Zawdie G. Science parks and university–industry collaboration in Malaysia. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 2008;20(6):727-39.

      [21] Arokiasamy ARA. An analysis of globalization and higher education in Malaysia. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research. 2011;1(9):73.

      [22] Bukhari M, Othman F, Adik N, Makhdzar W, Ibrahim W, Abdullah A. Best Practices In Industry-Academia Partnership from ICoE Healthcare’s perspective. 2015.

      [23] Etzkowitz H. Normative change in science and the birth of the Triple Helix. Social Science Information. 2011;50(3-4):549-68.

      [24] Ahmad BB. Malaysia Education Blueprint 2015-2025. Ministry of Higher Education. 2016.

      [25] Ankrah S, Omar A-T. Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 2015;31(3):387-408.

      [26] Chandran V, Sundram VPK, Santhidran S. Innovation systems in Malaysia: a perspective of university—industry R&D collaboration. AI & society. 2014;29(3):435-44.

      [27] TalentCorp. Industry-Academia Collaboration for GBS Sector launched. 2016.

      [28] Times TNY. Loss of Young Talent Thwarts Malaysia’s Growth. 2010.

      [29] Alford RR, Friedland R. Powers of theory: Capitalism, the state, and democracy: Cambridge University Press; 1985.

      [30] Saad M, Zawdie G. Theory and Practice of Triple Helix Model in Developing Countries: Issues and Challenges: Taylor & Francis; 2011.

      [31] Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research policy. 2000;29(2):109-23.

      [32] Sotarauta M, Kosonen K-J. Customized innovation policies and the regions: digital content services and intelligent machinery in Finland. European Urban and Regional Studies. 2013;20(2):258-74.


 

View

Download

Article ID: 18147
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18147




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.