The Concept Mapping in Learning Strategies: an Experimental Study of the Effect of Learning Strategies and the Attitude of the Students Towards Subjects and Ethical Learning Outcomes

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract

    The objective of this research is to find out the effect of learning strategies and the attitude of students on the Ethics course and its learning outcomes. The research is conducted to the students (n=84) of The School of Politics Djuanda University Bogor. It is applied an experiment of 2 x 2 factorial designs. The results of this research are: (1) The students learning outcomes of the course by using concept mapping strategy is higher than those who used conventional strategy; (2) The learning outcomes of the students with positive attitude and used the concept mapping is higher than those who used conventional strategy; (3)The students with negative attitude, and used the concept mapping is lower than those who used conventional strategy; (4) There is an interaction effect between learning strategy and attitude toward students’ learning outcomes of the course of public administration Ethics. Learning outcomes of students who have positive attitude toward the course of Public Administration Ethics can be improved by using concept mapping learning strategies.



  • Keywords

    Concept Mapping; Learning; Strategy; Students Attitude.

  • References

    1. [1] Miarso YH. Menyemai Benih Teknologi. Jakarta: Penerbit Kencana; 2005.

      [2] Widyastini IG. Unsur-Unsur Filsafat Ilmu. Yogyakarta: UGM Press; 1992.

      [3] Ali M. Pengantar Filsafat dalam Filsafat Ilmu sebagai Dasar Pengembangan Ilmu Pengetahuan. Klaten: Zintan Paruwara; 1997.

      [4] Seels, Richey. Instructional Technology: the definition and domains of the field. Washington DC: Association for Educational Communication and Technology; 1994.

      [5] Carey Da. The Systematic Design of Instruction. Boston: Boston Pearson; 2005.

      [6] Briggs Ga. Kondisi Belajar dan Teori Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Pusat Antar Universitas Dirjen DIKTI; 1990.

      [7] Suparman A. Desain Intsruksional. Jakarta: Dirjen DIKTI Depdikbud; 1997.

      [8] Snead GL, Wycoff J. Lindmapping Your Personal Guide to Exploring Creativity and Problem-Solving. New York: Institute International Granklin; 1991.

      [9] Stahl RJ. Essentials of Educational Measurement. New Jersey: New Jersey Prentice; 1979.

      [10] Grayson W. Concept Mapping and Curriculum Design ( The University of Tennesses at Chattanooga).

      [11] Martin, Briggs LJ. The Affective and Cognitive Domains: Integration for Instruction and Research. Englewood Cliffs N.J: Educational Technology Publication Inc.; 1986.

      [12] Buzan T. Gunakan Kepala Anda: Teknik Berpikir, Belajar dan Membangun Otak: Pustaka Delaprasta; 1999.

      [13] Lau, B J, Shani AR. Behavior in Organization: An Experiential Approach. Homewood: Richard Irwin Inc.; 1992.

      [14] Fishbein, Ajzen. Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Philipines: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc.; 1975.

      [15] R B, Kendler FB. Psychology Understanding Human Incognitive Domain. London: Longman Group Ltd.; 1956.

      [16] Shoemaker RM. Diffusion of Innovation: Third Edition. New York: Mac Millan Publs. Co Inc. Avenue; 1983.

      [17] Fred, Kerlinger. Asas Asas Penelitian Behavioral. Yogyakarta: UGM Press; 2000.




Article ID: 17183
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i3.21.17183

Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.