An Effective Texture Features Based Mammogram Mass Detection System


  • K Rajendra Prasad
  • T Suneetha Rani
  • Suleman Basha







The identification of Mammogram is a very complicated application in Bio-medical field, it has complicated tissues. Nowadays breast cancer test, Bio-medical field often miss approximately 10% - 30% of tumors because of the ambiguous margins of lesions and visual weakness ensuing from long-time identification. For these reasons, numerous computer-aided recognition systems have been residential to aid Bio-medical in detecting mammographic lesions which may point out the existence of breast cancerthis revision presents a repeated Computer detection system that uses limited and isolated quality features for mammographic mass recognition. And system segments some adaptive square regions of interest (ROIs) for apprehensive areas. This revise also proposes two tricky feature withdrawal methods based on co-occurrence environment and visual compactness alteration to illustrate restricted quality uniqueness and the isolated photometric allocation of each ROI. As a final point, this revision uses stepwise linear discriminate examination to grade typical regions by selecting and evaluating the entity presentation of each feature. Consequences demonstrate that the projected system achieves

acceptable recognition concert.


[1] K. Rajendra Prasad, C. Raghavendra, K Sai Saranya, “A Review on Classification of Breast Cancer Detection using Combination of The Feature Extraction Modelsâ€, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Volume 116 No. 21 2017, 203-208.

[2] Anu Alias ., “Detection of Breast Cancer Using Artificial Neural Networksâ€,International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology Vol. 3, Issue 3, March 2014.

[3] Tobia Christian cahoon, “Breast Cancer Detection Using Image Processing Techniquesâ€, IEEE trans. On Image Processing.

[4] K.Rajendra Prasad, C.Raghavendra,Padakandla Vyshnav, “Intelligent System for Visualized Data Analytics A Reviewâ€, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Volume 116 No. 21 2017, 217-224.

[5] Shen-Chuan Tai, “An Automatic Mass Detection System in Mammograms Based onComplex Texture Featuresâ€, IEEE JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH INFORMATICS vol. 18,NO. 2, MARCH 2014.

[6] C. Raghavendra, Dr. A Kumaravel, A. Anjaiah, “A New Hybrid Method for Image De-Noising In Light Of Wavelet Transformâ€, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Volume 116 No. 21 2017, 197-202.

[7] Zhili Chen, “Topological Modeling and Classification of Mammographic Microcalcification Clustersâ€, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, c. 62, NO. 4, APRIL 2015.

[8] K. Rajendra Prasad, C. Raghavendra, Effective Mammogram Classification Using Various Texture Features, Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, Vol. 9. Sp– 12 / 2017.

[9] S.kuma,, “Feature Extraction for Human Detection using HOG and CS-LBP methods†International Journal of Computer Applications,pages:11-14,2015.

[10] P. Kiran Kumar, C. Raghavendra, Dr. S. Sivasubramanyan, “Exploring Multi Scale Mathematical Morphology for Dark Image Enhancementâ€, International Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, Dec-2016, Vol. 8, Issue No.4, 23590-23597.

[11] Bellotti, R., De Carlo, F., Tangaro, S., Gargano, G., Maggipinto, G., Castellano, M., De Nunzio, G. (2006). A completely automated CAD system for mass detection in a large mammographic database. Medical Physics, 33(8), 3066–3075.

[12] C. Raghavendra, A. Kumaraveland S. Sivasuramanyan, “Features Subset Selection using Improved Teaching Learning based Optimisation (ITLBO) Algorithms for Iris Recognitionâ€, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 10(34), DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2017/v10i34/118307, September 2017.

[13] Hussain, M., Khan, S., Muhammad, G., Ahmad, I., &Bebis, G. (2012). Effective Extraction of Gabor Features for False Positive Reduction and Mass Classification in Mammography, 33(1), 29–33.

[14] Mohamed Abdel-Nasser, “Improvement of Mass Detection In Breast X-Ray Images Using Texture Analysis Methodsâ€, Artificial Intelligence Research and Development, doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-452-7-159.

[15] Oliver, A., et al., False positive reduction in mammographic mass detection using local binary patterns, Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, (2007). 286-293.

[16] Zheng, Y., Breast cancer detection with Gabor features from digital mammograms, Algorithms 3.1 (2010), 44-62.

[17] Pomponiu, Victor, et al., Improving breast mass detection using histogram of oriented gradients, SPIE Medical Imaging, International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2014.

[18] Ramirez R. et al., Local directional number pattern for face analysis: Face and expression recognition, , IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 22.5 (2013), 1740-1752.

[19] Dalal, N. and Triggs, B., Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, (2005), vol. 1, pp. 886-893.

[20] Haralick, R. M., et al., Textural features for image classification, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 6 (1973), 610-621.

[21] C.Nalini, C. Raghavendra, K. Rajendra Prasad, “Comparative Observation and Performance Analysis of Multiple Algorithms on Iris Dataâ€, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Volume 116 No. 9 2017, 319-325.

[22] M.venkatramana.,,review of recent texture classification: methods, IOSR journal of computer engineering2278-8727Volume 14, Issue 1 (Sep. - Oct. 2013), PP 54-60.

View Full Article:

How to Cite

Rajendra Prasad, K., Suneetha Rani, T., & Basha, S. (2018). An Effective Texture Features Based Mammogram Mass Detection System. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.12), 601–605.
Received 2018-07-28
Accepted 2018-07-28
Published 2018-07-20