Force Aware Haptic Rendering for Intubation Simulation

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    We introduce a new haptic rendering method for neonatal endotracheal intubation simulation. The challenging procedure involves multiple models of different material properties, and is performed in the narrow oral cavity involving multiple contacts with tongue, lips, and laryngoscope. Our method first sets up simple collision detection mechanism with adaptive inner sphere tree structure for deformable tongue tissue. Then a collision response is handled with a novel force aware projective position correction. Our method is proved to be effective for heterogeneous simulation environment, therefore can be applied to surgical simulation with similar difficult settings.

     

     

     

  • Keywords


    Collision handling, Force feedback, Haptic rendering, Surgical simulation.

  • References


      [1] Cagatay Basdogan and Mandayam A Srinivasan. 2002. Haptic rendering in virtual environments. Handbook of virtual environments 1 (2002), 117–134.

      [2] Gino van den Bergen. 1997. Efficient collision detection of complex deformable models using AABB trees. Journal of Graphics Tools 2, 4 (1997), 1–13.

      [3] Stefan Gottschalk, Ming C Lin, and Dinesh Manocha. 1996. OBBTree: A hierarchical structure for rapid interference detection. In Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. ACM, 171–180.

      [4] P. M. Hubbard. 1995. Collision detection for interactive graphics applications. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 1, 3 (Sep 1995), 218–230. https://doi.org/10.1109/2945.466717

      [5] Philip M. Hubbard. 1996. Approximating Polyhedra with Spheres for Timecritical Collision Detection. ACM Trans. Graph. 15, 3 (July 1996), 179–210. https://doi.org/10.1145/231731.231732

      [6] Kun Qian, Xiaosong Yang, Jianjun Zhang, and Meili Wang. 2015. An adaptive spherical collision detection and resolution method for deformable object simulation. In Computer-Aided Design and Computer Graphics (CAD/Graphics), 2015 14th International Conference on. IEEE, 8–17.

      [7] S. Hasegawa and M. Sato. Real-time rigid body simulation for haptic interactions based on contact volume of polygonal objects. Computer Graphics Forum 23, 3 ([n. d.]), 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2004.00784.x arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2004.00784.x

      [8] Matthias Renz, Carsten Preusche, Marco PÃűtke, Hans peter Kriegel, and Gerd Hirzinger. 2001. Stable haptic interaction with virtual environments using an adapted voxmap-pointshell algorithm. In Proc. Eurohaptics. 149–154.

      [9] H. Xu and J. Barbic. 2017. 6-DoF haptic rendering using continuous collision detection between points and signed distance fields. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 10, 2 (April 2017), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2016.2613872

      [10] Hadrien Courtecuisse, Yinoussa Adagolodjo, Hervé Delingette, and Christian Duriez. 2015. Haptic rendering of hyperelastic models with friction. In Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on. IEEE, 591– 596.

      [11] Hadrien Courtecuisse, Jérémie Allard, Christian Duriez, and Stéphane Cotin. 2011. Preconditioner-based contact response and application to cataract surgery. In MICCAI - 14th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention - 2011 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), G. Fichtinger, A. Martel, and T. Peters (Eds.), Vol. 6891. Springer, Toronto, Canada, 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23623-5_40

      [12] Hoeryong Jung, Stéphane Cotin, Christian Duriez, Jérémie Allard, and Doo Yong Lee. 2010. High fidelity haptic rendering for deformable objects undergoing topology changes. In EuroHaptics - Haptics: Generating and Perceiving Tangible Sensations International Conference (LNCS), Vol. 6191. Springer, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 262–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14064-8_38

      [13] A Okrainec, M Farcas, O Henao, I Choy, J Green, M Fotoohi, R Leslie, D Wight, P Karam, N Gonzalez, et al. 2009. Development of a virtual reality haptic Veress needle insertion simulator for surgical skills training. Stud Health Technol Inform 142 (2009), 233–238.

      [14] Eusebio Ricardez, Julieta Noguez, Luis Neri, Lourdes Munoz-Gomez, and David Escobar-Castillejos. 2014. SutureHap: A suture simulator with haptic feedback. In Workshop on Virtual Reality Interaction and Physical Simulation, Jan Bender, Christian Duriez, Fabrice Jaillet, and Gabriel Zachmann (Eds.). The Eurographics Association. https://doi.org/10.2312/vriphys.20141226

      [15] Iago Berndt, Rafael Torchelsen, and Anderson Maciel. 2017. Efficient surgical cutting with position-based dynamics. IEEE computer graphics and applications 38, 3 (2017), 24–31.

      [16] Hadrien Courtecuisse, Jérémie Allard, Pierre Kerfriden, Stéphane PA Bordas, Stéphane Cotin, and Christian Duriez. 2014. Real-time simulation of contact and cutting of heterogeneous soft-tissues. Medical Image Analysis 18, 2 (2014), 394–410.

      [17] Shi-Yu Jia, Zhen-Kuan Pan, Guo-Dong Wang, Wei-Zhong Zhang, and Xiao-Kang Yu. 2017. Stable real-time surgical cutting simulation of deformable objects embedded with arbitrary triangular meshes. Journal of Computer Science and Technology 32, 6 (2017), 1198–1213.

      [18] Wang D, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Xiao J. 2013. Confi guration-based optimization for six degree-offreedom haptic rendering forfi ne manipulation. IEEE Trans Haptics 6(2):167– 180

      [19] Rene Weller and Gabriel Zachmann. 2009. A unified approach for physically-based simulations and haptic rendering. In Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video Games (Sandbox ’09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1145/1581073.1581097

      [20] Morten Bro-Nielsen. 1998. Finite element modeling in surgery simulation. Proc.IEEE 86, 3 (1998), 490–503.

      [21] Robert Bridson, Ronald Fedkiw, and John Anderson. 2005. Robust treatment of collisions, contact and friction for cloth animation. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Courses (SIGGRAPH ’05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1145/1198555.1198572

      [22] Matthew Moore and Jane Wilhelms. 1988. Collision detection and response for computer animation. SIGGRAPH Computer Graph. 22, 4 (June 1988), 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1145/378456.378528

      [23] Ingmar Wegner Marco Nolden Thomas Bottger Mark Hastenteufel Max Schobinger Tobias Kunert Hans-Peter Meinzer Ivo Wolf, Marcus Vetter. 2004. The medical imaging interaction toolkit (MITK): a toolkit facilitating the creation of interactive software by extending VTK and ITK. (2004),. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.535112

      [24] François Faure, Christian Duriez, Hervé Delingette, Jérémie Allard, Benjamin Gilles, Stéphanie Marchesseau, Hugo Talbot, Hadrien Courtecuisse, Guillaume Bousquet, Igor Peterlik, and Stéphane Cotin. 2012. SOFA: A Multi-Model Framework for Interactive Physical Simulation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 283–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/8415_2012_125


 

View

Download

Article ID: 16184
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i3.16.16184




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.