Heterogeneity Management Using OAEI Benchmark Dataset


  • Kaladevi Ramar
  • . .






Ontology, OAEI, Reference ontology.


The evolution of ontologies and itsapplications are in various fields like artificial intelligence, reasoning, philosophy, biological science, and medical field. The components of ontologiesare concepts, instance, relationships, constraints, axioms and inference mechanism. Ontology is a main source for enabling interoperability in the semantic web. In this paper heterogeneities are identified between information systems and the possible rectification are carried out using OAEI benchmark datasets. Proposed method is compared with S-Match algorithm. The evaluation results shows that proposed method is performed better and structure changes of input ontologies not affect the results.




[1] Aleksovski, Z, Klein, M, ten Kate, W & van Harmelen, F 2006,‘Matching unstructured vocabularies using a background Ontology’, InProceedings of Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management(EKAW), pp. 182-197.

[2] Giunchiglia, F, Shvaiko, P &Yatskevich, M 2006, ‘Discovering missing background knowledge in ontology matching’, In ECAI,pp. 382-386.

[3] Gruber T. 1993. A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications, Knowledge Acquisition. 5: 199-220.

[4] Jain, P, Hitzler, P, Sheth, A, Verma, K&Yeh, P 2010, ‘Ontologyalignment for linked open data’, in Proc. 9th International SemanticWeb Conference (ISWC), pp. 402-417.

[5] Kaladevi, R &Mirnalini, TT 2015, ‘A framework for heterogeneous information management using ontology mapping’, ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, ISSN. 1819-6608, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 2078-2081.

[6] Kashyap, V &Sheth, A 1996, ‘Semantic and schematic similaritiesbetween database objects: A context-based approach’, The VLDBJournal, vol. 5, pp. 276-304.

[7] Madhavan, J, Bernstein, P, Doan, A &Halevy, A 2005, ‘Corpus basedschema matching’, in Proc. 21st International Conference on DataEngineering (ICDE), pp. 57-68.

[8] Mascardi, V, Locoro, A & Rosso, P 2010, ‘Automatic ontologymatching via upper ontologies: A systematic evaluation’, IEEETransactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 22, no. 5,pp. 609-623.

[9] Mora, M, Ernesto, R&Ichise, R 2013, ‘Ontology matching by activelypropagating user feedbacks through upper ontologies’, AcademicJournal, vol. 10, issue 2, pp. 85-93.

[10] Patel M, Koch T, Doerr M, Tsinaraki,C. 2005. Semantic Interoperability in Digital Library Systems, UKOLN, University of Bath. pp. 1-73.

[11] Sabou, M, d’Aquin, M& Motta, E. 2008, ‘Exploring the semantic webas background knowledge for ontology matching’, Journal on DataSemantics, vol. XI, pp. 156-190.

[12] Shi, F, Li, J, Tang, J, Xie, G & Li, H 2009, ‘Actively learning ontologymatching via user interaction’, In Proc. 8th Int. Semantic Web Conf,pp. 585-600.

[13] Zhang, S &Bodenreider, O 2005, ‘Alignment of multiple ontologies ofanatomy: deriving indirect mappings from direct mappings to areference’, In Proceedings of AMIA Annual Symposium, pp. 864-868.

View Full Article:

How to Cite

Ramar, K., & ., . (2018). Heterogeneity Management Using OAEI Benchmark Dataset. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.12), 481–484. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.12.16163
Received 2018-07-24
Accepted 2018-07-24
Published 2018-07-20