Troubled Projects in Construction Due To Scant Risk Management


  • Subramanyam B
  • Iswarya R





Risk, Management, Assessment, Project Cycle, Decision Making.


This paper will focus on troubled projects in construction due to inadequate and insufficient risk management. Inadequate risk management has the ability to severely impact construction project. The main objective of the present paper is to attempt a composition of already known risk management process, at such way that it can be applied by the modern enterprises that deal with the undertaking or/and implementation of constructional work. This paper describes about the main sources for the failure of a construction project such as no initial risk assessment, inadequate documentation and tracking, irregular & incomplete status reporting, failure to define parameters etc. The methodology contains examining existing data, results and created a checklist for all those who are involved in construction project disasters. It can be applied at all stages in the project cycle, from the earliest assessments of strategy to initiation, planning, implementation and closure. Risk management will also provide advantages in better accountability and justification of decisions, by providing a well-suited and robust process that supports decision-making.



[1] Mohammed Algahtany, YasirAlhammadi, Dean Kashiwagi, “Introducing a New Risk Management Model to the Saudi Arabian Construction Industryâ€, Procedia Engineering, 940 – 947, 145 (2016).

[2] Alfredo Serpell, XimenaFerrada, Larissa Rubio, Sergio Arauzo, “Evaluating Risk Management Practices in Construction Organizationsâ€, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 201 – 210, 194 (2015).

[3] LI Qing, LIU Rengkui, ZHANG Jun, SUN Quanxin, “Quality risk management model for railway construction projectsâ€, Procedia Engineering,195 – 203, 84 (2014).

[4] Andreas Wibowo, JanuarTaufik, “Developing a Self-Assessment Model of Risk Management Maturity for Client Organizations of Public Construction Projects: Indonesian contextâ€, Procedia Engineering, 274 – 281, 171 (2017).

[5] Xiaohua Jin, Guomin Zhang, Junxiao Liu, YingbinFeng, JianZuo, “Major Participants in the Construction Industryand Their Approaches to Risks: a Theoretical Frameworkâ€, Procedia Engineering, 314 – 320, 182 (2017).

[6] Pawelszymanski, “Risk Management in Construction Projectsâ€, Procedia Engineering, 174-182, 208 (2017).

[7] Adam Abderisak, GöranLindahl, “Take a chance on me? Construction client’s perspectives on riskmanagementâ€, Procedia Economics and Finance, 548 – 554, 21 (2015).

[8] Mohamed SayedBassiony Ahmed Abd El-Karim, Omar AlyMosa El Nawawy, Ahmed Mohamed Abdel-Alim, “Identification and assessment of risk factorsaffecting construction projectsâ€, HBRC Journal, 202–216, 13 (2017).

[9] AgnieszkaDziadosz, MariuszRejment, “Risk analysis in construction project - chosen methodsâ€, Procedia Engineering, 258 – 265, 122 (2015).

[10] Alfredo Federico Serpellaa,XimenaFerradaa, Rodolfo Howarda, Larissa Rubioa, “Risk management in construction projects: a knowledge-basedapproachâ€, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences ,653 – 662, 119 (2014).

View Full Article:

How to Cite

B, S., & R, I. (2018). Troubled Projects in Construction Due To Scant Risk Management. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.12), 322–325.
Received 2018-07-22
Accepted 2018-07-22
Published 2018-07-20