Empirical investigation of indoor environmental quality (IEQ) in a hospital building in Merida Yucatan, Mexico

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    This research summarizes the result of physical measurement of the indoor environmental quality (IEQ) in two different hospital rooms, from a small hospital in Merida Yucatan, Mexico. The results show wide differences in the established parameters for this evaluation and the measures obtained. The temperature levels exceed the range of 20-26ºC in both rooms, considering that bothrooms have air conditioning system (ISO 7730, 2005). The levels of Relative Humidity also exceed in more than 20% of the permitted range. The amount of CO2 is registered in higher levels when the air conditioning system is on, this is due to the lack of circulation and proper ventilation (ASHRAE 62.1, 2016). About Light Intensity showing the difference between rooms, is represented in the obtained results in the established parameters and their physical characteristics (NOM-025-STPS, 2008). Optimum conditions in indoor environments should result in health, well-being and comfort, both in terms of working life and in the areas where healthcare is concerned. The current society demands safe, clean and well-conditioned places, for which it is necessary to integrate perceptions and demands of the users to reach an optimal balance between social and legislative standards.

     

     


  • Keywords


    Environmental Quality, Evaluation, Healthcare facility, Indoor, Measurement.

  • References


      [1] Dascalaki E., Gaglia A., Balaras C., & Lagoudi A. “Indoor environmental quality in Hellenic hospital operating rooms”. Energy and Buildings, Vol.41, No.5, (2009). pp.551-560. available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.11.023

      [2] Croitoru, C., Vartires, A., Bode, F., & Dogeanu, A. “Survey Evaluation of the Indoor Environment Quality in a Large Romanian Hospital”. INCAS BULLETIN, Vol.5, No.3, (2013). pp. 45-52. available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.13111/2066-8201.2013.5.3.5

      [3] Global Green and Healthy Hospitals. (2017). Greenhospitals.net. Last visit:14.09.2017, available online: https://www.greenhospitals.net

      [4] NMX-AA-162-SCFI-2012. “Auditoría Ambiental, Metodología para realizar auditorías y diagnósticos, ambientales”. PROFEPA. (2013) Last visit: 08.04.2018, available online: http://www.ens.uabc.mx/documentos/NMX-AA-162-SCFI-2012_DOF_02-10-2013.pdf

      [5] WELL Building Standard. (2017). International WELL Building Institute. Last visit:14.09.2017, available online: https://www.wellcertified.com/en

      [6] CINVESTAV. (2017). Mda.cinvestav.mx. Last visit: 12.09.2017, available online: http://www.mda.cinvestav.mx/weather/NOAAPRYR.TXT

      [7] INEGI (2017).Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. available online: http://www.inegi.org.mx

      [8] UNE 171330-1:2008.(2008) Calidad del Ambiente Interior. Instituto Nacional de Seguridad e Higiene en el Trabajo. Centro Nacional de Nuevas Tecnologías. Madrid España.

      [9] NOM-025-STPS-2008. (2008) Norma Oficial Mexicana, Condiciones de iluminación en los centros de trabajo.

      [10] Bernhofer, E., Higgins, P., Daly, B., Burant, C., & Hornick, T. “Hospital lighting and its association with sleep, mood and pain in medical inpatients”. Journal Of Advanced Nursing, Vol.70, No.5, (2013). pp. 1164-1173. available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.12282

      [11] ASHRAE 62.1-2016. (2016) Ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-conditioning Engineering. Atlanta USA.


 

View

Download

Article ID: 16018
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i3.11.16018




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.