A reinforced coconut char, jute and glass fibers composite material mechanical effects compared by using taguchi method and analysis (nova) technique


  • J. . K.Kumar Research Scholar
  • Dr. R. Venkatesh Babu Professor
  • M. Arul Murugan Research Scholar






Composite Material, Natural Fibers, Natural Fiber Matrix, Coconut Char, Jute and Glass Fiber.


This research work explains the different mechanical effects of natural fiber composites to increase its strength and they were reinforced with different reinforcements. The matrix is considered as natural fiber matrix composites with coconut char; Jute and glass fiber composite materials were taken and give special properties for different applications in automobiles. Natural fiber composites have different advanced applications in current engineering materials. Hence the special properties like high strength, greater flexibility and abundantly available properties. With the help of different combination and proportions these materials were reinforced with dif-ferent combinational materials were obtained for testing and selection of best combination material. The general properties for any ma-terial like mechanical properties of different reinforcements with different samples were tested and results were analyzed with the help of ANOVA and signal to noise ratio were found out by using MINITAB 18 Statistical software and results were compared.




[1] Guo, N., & Leu, M. C. (2013). Additive manufacturing: technolo- gy, applications and research needs. Frontiers of Mechanical Engi- neering, 8(3), 215-243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-013-0248-8.

[2] Helu, M., Vijayaraghavan, A., & Dornfeld, D. (2011). Evaluating the relationship between use phase environmental impacts and manufacturing process precision. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 60(1), 49-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.020.

[3] Rajmohan, T., Palanikumar, K., & Ranganathan, S. (2013). Evalua- tion of mechanical and wear properties of hybrid aluminium matrix composites. Transactions of nonferrous metals society of China, 23(9), 2509-2517. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(13)62762-4.

[4] Suresha, S., & Sridhara, B. K. (2012). Friction characteristics of aluminium silicon carbide graphite hybrid composites. Materials & Design, 34, 576-583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.05.010.

[5] Boopathi, M. M., Arulshri, K. P., & Iyandurai, N. (2013). Evalua- tion of mechanical properties of aluminium alloy 2024 reinforced with silicon carbide and fly ash hybrid metal matrix composites. American journal of applied sciences, 10(3), 219. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2013.219.229.

[6] Prasad, D. S., & Shoba, C. (2014). Hybrid composites–a better choice for high wear resistant materials. Journal of Materials Re- search and Technology, 3(2), 172-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2014.03.004.

[7] Prasad, D. S., Shoba, C., & Ramanaiah, N. (2014). Investigations on mechanical properties of aluminum hybrid composites. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 3(1), 79-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2013.11.002.

[8] Alaneme, K. K., Bodunrin, M. O., & Awe, A. A. (2016). Micro- structure, mechanical and fracture properties of groundnut shell ash and silicon carbide dispersion strengthened aluminium matrix com- posites. Journal of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences.

[9] Alaneme, K. K., & Aluko, A. O. (2012). Fracture toughness (K1C) and tensile properties of as-cast and age-hardened aluminium (6063)–silicon carbide particulate composites. Scientia Iranica, 19(4), 992-996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2012.06.001.

[10] Alaneme, K. K. (2012). Influence of thermo-mechanical treatment on the tensile behaviour and CNT evaluated fracture toughness of borax premixed SiCp reinforced aluminum (6063) composites. In- ternational Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, 7(1), 96-100.

[11] Ravesh, S. K., & Garg, T. K. (2012). Preparation & analysis for some mechanical property of aluminium based metal matrix com- posite reinforced with SiC & fly ash. International Journal of Engi- neering Research and Applications, 2(6), 727-731.

[12] Chawla, N., & Shen, Y. L. (2001). Mechanical behavior of particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Advanced engineering materi- als, 3(6), 357-370. https://doi.org/10.1002/1527-2648(200106)3:6<357::AID-ADEM357>3.0.CO;2-I.

[13] Alaneme, K. K., & Adewale, T. M. (2013). Influence of rice husk ash–silicon carbide weight ratios on the mechanical behaviour of Al-Mg-Si alloy matrix hybrid composites. Tribology in industry, 35(2), 163-172.

[14] Hosking, F. M., Portillo, F. F., Wunderlin, R., & Mehrabian, R. (1982). Composites of aluminium alloys: fabrication and wear be- haviour. Journal of Materials Science, 17(2), 477-498. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00591483.

[15] Wilson, S., & Alpas, A. T. (1997). Wear mechanism maps for metal matrix composites. Wear, 212(1), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(97)00142-7.

[16] Deuis, R. L., Subramanian, C., & Yellup, J. M. (1997). Dry sliding wear of aluminium composites—a review. Composites Science and Technology, 57(4), 415-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00167-4.

[17] Casati, R., & Vedani, M. (2014). Metal matrix composites rein- forced by nano-particles—a review. Metals, 4(1), 65-83. https://doi.org/10.3390/met4010065.

[18] Moustafa, S. F., & Soliman, F. A. (1997). Wear resistance of δ-type aluminafibre reinforced Al-4percentage Cu matrix composite. Tri- bology Letters, 3(4), 311-315. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019166129670.

[19] Yalcin, Y., & Akbulut, H. (2006). Dry wear properties of A356-SiC particle reinforced MMCs produced by two melting routes. Materi- als & design, 27(10), 872-881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2005.03.007.

[20] Gürler, R. (1999). Sliding Wear Behavior of a Silicon Carbide Par- ticle–Reinforced Aluminum–magnesium Alloy. Journal of materi- als science letters, 18(7), 553-554. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006630612974.

[21] Reihani, S. S. (2006). Processing of squeeze cast Al6061– 30 vol percentage SiC composites and their characterization. Materi- als & design, 27(3), 216-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2004.10.016.

View Full Article: