Inclusive Entrepreneurship Infrastructure Development Special Aspects in Ukraine

  • Authors

    • Andrey Skrylnik
    • Sergii Valiavskiy
    • Oksana Voloshina
    2018-06-20
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.2.14565
  • business model, development, inclusive entrepreneurship, infrastructure, inclusion
  • The purpose of the scientific article was to formulate a model for the infrastructure development  for inclusive entrepreneurship in Ukraine. For this purpose, the approaches of domestic scientists and practitioners concerning typology and identification of the main features and functions of inclusive entrepreneurship are generalized. It has been determined that inclusive development of entrepreneurship in contemporary conditions is considered as a policy for ensuring the possibility of starting their own business or self-employment for all groups of the population. The world experience of the inclusive entrepreneurship formation and development is generalized and the main factors hindering the activation of inclusive entrepreneurship in Ukraine at micro and macro levels are revealed. The funding sources structuring for inclusive entrepreneurship development at the territorial level was carried out.   European models adaptation development problem of inclusive entrepreneurship in Ukraine for various social groups of the population is explored. Certain proposals for the implementation of vectors development inclusive enterprise, architectural, construction, financial, economic and social are formulated. Practical recommendations are developed, which will promote the development of inclusive business systems and improve the access of society all members to economic benefits, through the establishment of their own business or employment.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Bibikova V. (2015) Social Enterprise in Ukraine. International Comparative Social Enterprise Models. – ICSEM Working Papers.. Vol.. 12, 39 p.

      [2] Edgard Barki (2015). Social entrepreneurship and social business: retrospective and prospective research. Revista de Administração de Empresas: Rev. adm. empres. vol.55 no.4 São Paulo. Access mode:: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020150402

      [3] Europе-2020: A European Strategy for Smart, Sustainable, and Inclusive Growth–European Commission, 3.3.2010 Access mode: http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/index_en.htm

      [4] Fosters C. and Heeks R. (2016) Drivers of inclusive innovation in Developing Country Markets. A Policy Perspective inclusive innovation for Sustainable Development, DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-60168-1_4

      [5] Giannopoulos G. (2013) The Use of the Balanced Scorecard in Small Companies. International Journal of Business and Management. Ottawa: Canadian Center of Science and Education,Vol. 8., Issue 14. Access mode: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v8n14p1.

      [6] Laura Michelini, Daniela Fiorentino, (2012) "New business models for creating shared value", Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 8 Issue: 4, pp.561-577, https://doi.org/10.1108/17471111211272129

      [7] OECD/EU (2016), Inclusive Business Creation: Good Practice Compendium, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264251496-en

      [8] OECD/European Commission (2013), The Missing Entrepreneurs: Policies for Inclusive Entrepreneurship in Europe, Paris, OECD Publishing, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264188167-en

      [9] OECD/European Commission (2015), “Policy Brief on Expanding Networks for Inclusive Entrepreneurshipâ€, OECD Publishing, Paris and EU Publishing, Luxembourg. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/ 5jrtpbz29mjh-en

      [10]Papaioannou T. (2014). How inclusive can innovation and development be in the twenty-first century? Innovation and Development, Vol. 4. Iss. 2. рр. 187-202. Access mode: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2157930X. 2014.921355

      [11]Putnins, T. and A. Sauka (2014), “Measuring the Shadow Economy Using Company Managersâ€, Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 43(2), May 2015, pp. 471-490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2014.04.001

      [12]Rüdiger Hahn (2012) Inclusive business, human rights and the dignity of the poor: a glance beyond economic impacts of adapted business models. Business Ethecs, Vol. 21, Issue1. pp. 47-63. Access mode: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2011.01640.x

      [13]Santiago F. (2014). Innovation for inclusive development. Innovation and Development. Vol. 4. Iss. 1. рр. 1-4. Access mode:: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 2157930X.2014.890353.

      [14]Overchuk A. (2017) Classification of risks in the process of financial planning. Problems of the theory and methodology of accounting, control and analysis, Issue 3 (38) Access mode: http://dx.doi.org/10.26642/pbo-2017-3(38)-99-103

      [15]Bazilyuk A. (2015) Inclusive growth as a basis for socio-economic development [Electronic resource]. Economy and management in transport. Vol. 1. - P. 19-29.

      [16]Naumov M. (2016) Prospects and problems of the development of social entrepreneurship in Ukraine . Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economics; Vol. 8 (185): pp. 13-22 - Access mode: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2016/185-8/2

      [17]Ustinov Y. (2016) Socio-demographic background of human development [Electronic resource] . Theory and practice of state administration and local self-government. Vol. 1. Access mode: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Ttpdu_2016_1_14

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Skrylnik, A., Valiavskiy, S., & Voloshina, O. (2018). Inclusive Entrepreneurship Infrastructure Development Special Aspects in Ukraine. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.2), 425-430. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.2.14565