A study on the optimal line integrated design analysis system

  • Authors

    • Taesung Kim
    • Hyunsoo Lee
    • Heedong Hong
    2018-06-08
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.33.13875
  • Standardized Process, Smart Virtual Production Technology Strategy, Data Management, Intuitive User Experience, MES, ERP.

  • Background/Objectives: This paper is a study on a system that standardizes processes based on smart virtual production technology strategy for manufacturing line design and development, and integrates new or existing resources and systems into one consistent and structured framework.

    Methods/Statistical analysis: In this paper, we standardize the process based on the digital virtual production technology strategy for manufacturing line design and development. A system that integrates new or existing resources and systems into a single, unified framework. Through this system, various events participating in the development of the manufacturing line can receive standardized work progress and communication in one consistent system. In addition, we standardized and library the scattered data to minimize the loss of data management.

    Findings: Users across a wide range of areas can quickly and easily perform line development from line planning to design, setup and optimization based on standardized processes and an intuitive user experience. By providing analysis results in conjunction with heterogeneous analysis engines, you can perform solution-independent business processes. The effectiveness of the proposed system was verified by applying the proposed system to the actual new and expansion manufacturing line and redesign line in the company and performing line development work.

    Improvements/Applications: Through this study, it is expected that the actual field data of MES (Manufacturing Execution System) and the information of planning system such as ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) can be linked to the integrated decision support system of engineering solution.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Balci O, Arthur J D, and Nance R E, Accomplishing Reuse with a Simulation Conceptual Model. IEEE Simulation Conference, WSC 2008, pp. 959-965.

      [2] Bracht U, and Masurat T, the Digital Factory between Vision and Reality. Computers in Industry, 2005, 56(4), pp. 325-333.

      [3] Brown R G, Driving Digital Manufacturing to Reality. IEEE Simulation Conference, 2000, pp. 224-228.

      [4] Cagliano R, and Spina G, Advanced Manufacturing Technologies and Strategically Flexible Production, Journal of Operations Management, 2000, 18(2), pp. 169-190.

      [5] Choi S H, and Chan A M M, A Virtual Prototyping System for Rapid Product Development. Computer-Aided Design, 2004,36(5), pp. 401-412.

      [6] Chryssolouris G, Mavrikios D, Papakostas N, Mourtzis D, Michalos G, and Georgoulias K, Digital Manufacturing: history, perspectives, and outlook, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2009, 223(5), pp. 451-462.

      [7] Choi S S, Yoon T H, and Noh S D, XML-based Neutral File and PLM Integrator for PPR Information Exchange between Heterogeneous PLM Systems, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 2010, 23(3), pp. 216-228.

      [8] Choi B K, Park B C, and Park J H,A Formal Model Conversion Approach to Developing a DEVS-based Factory Simulator, Simulation, 2003, 79(8), pp. 440-461.

      [9] Cummins F A, Building the Agile Enterprise: with SOA, BPM and MBM, Morgan Kaufmann, 2010.

      [10] De Vin L J, Oscarsson J, Ng A, Jägstam M, and Karlsson T, Manufacturing Simulation: good practice, pitfalls, and advanced applications, IMC-21, Limerick, Ireland, 2004,pp.156-163.

      [11] Kim D, Cho H B, Jung M Y, Process Modeling Tools for Automatic Generation of Simulation Models, Proceedings of the KIIE/KORS Joint Spring Conference, Chungjoo, Korea, 1996, pp. 627-630.

      [12] Kochan A, BMW Innovates at New Leipzig Assembly Plant. Assembly Automation, 2006, 26(2), pp. 111-114.

      [13] MittalS, Risco-Martín J L, and Zeigler B P, DEVS/SOA: A Cross-platform Framework for Network-Centric Modeling and Simulation in DEVS Unified Process, Simulation, 2009, 85(7), pp. 419-450.

      [14] Mittal S, Zeigler B P, and Martin J L R, Implementation of Formal Standard for Interoperability in M&S/systems of Systems Integration with DEVS/SOA, International Command and Control C2 Journal, Special Issue: Modeling and Simulation in Support of Network-Centric Approaches and Capabilities, 2009, 3(1). pp. 28-31.

      [15] Noh S D, Kim D Y, and Park Y J, Virtual Manufacturing for an Automotive Company (III)–Construction and Operation of a Virtual Paint Shop. IE Interfaces, 2002, 15(4), pp. 356-363.

      [16] Ouelhadj D, and Petrovic S, A Survey of Dynamic Scheduling in Manufacturing Systems. Journal of Scheduling, 2009, 12(4), pp. 417-431.

      [17] Panetto H, and Molina A, Enterprise Integration and Interoperability in Manufacturing Systems: Trends and issues. Computers in industry, 2008, 59(7), pp. 641-646.

      [18] Schloegl W, Bringing the Digital Factory into Reality–virtual Manufacturing with Real Automation Data. In Proc. of International Conference on Changeable, Agile, Reconfigurable and Virtual Production, 2005, pp. 187-192.

      [19] Son Y J, Wysk R A, and Jones A T, Simulation-based Shop Floor Control: formal model, model generation and control interface, IIE Transactions, 2003, 35(1), pp. 29-48.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Kim, T., Lee, H., & Hong, H. (2018). A study on the optimal line integrated design analysis system. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.33), 155-160. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.33.13875