Parametric study of flyash based geopolymer concrete

  • Authors

    • Sourav Kumar Das
    2018-05-29
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.31.13439
  • Compressive strength, flyash, geopolymer concrete, GGBFS, sodium hydroxide, sodium silicate
  • With the growth of civilization the demand of cement concrete is increasing rapidly which increase the production of cement and abolishing the natural source of limestone. Also contributing a lot to the global warming by generating huge amount of carbon-di-oxide. Therefore the present study concentrate on the production of concrete using the geopolymerization technology which replaces cement fully by fly ash, a waste material and alkali solution. India is presently producing approximately 190 million tons of fly ash every year from moreover 145 power plants. Present research is focused on the different parameters which are curing temperature, ratio of sodium silicate to sodium hydroxide, molarity of sodium hydroxide, curing type and the results have been studied and discussed. Previous works emphasis that only the use of fly ash as the base material confine the concrete to be heat cured which limits the applicability of geopolymer concrete to cast-in-situ conditions. So some proportion of flyash is replaced by ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) and the effect on compressive and tensile strength is observed. Ambient temperature dry curing was done without any water when some proportion of fly ash was replaced by GGBFS. The ratio of sodium silicate solution to sodium hydroxide solution by mass was kept fixed at 2.5 and the concentration of sodium hydroxide was kept 14M. The ratio of flyash to alkali solution was kept 0.35 & 0.40. Replacing 40% of Flyash by GGBFS and keeping the concentration of NaOH as 14M at ambient temperature, the compressive strength encountered was 40 MPa.

     

  • References

    1. [1] Gokhale C, Master Thesis, University of Stellenbosh, (2001).

      [2] Llyod RR & Van Deventer JSJ, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, (2005).

      [3] Duxson P, Ferna´ndez-Jime´nez A, Provis JL, Lukey GC, Palomo A & Van Deventer JSJ, “Geopolymer technology: the current state of the artâ€, Journal of Materials Science, Vol.42, No.9, (2007), pp.2917–2933.

      [4] Davidovits J, “30 years of successes and failures in geopolymer applications. Market trends and potential breakthroughsâ€, Geopolymer Conference Saint-Quentin (France) Melbourne (Australia): Geopolymer Institute, (2002).

      [5] Hardjito D & Rangan BV, “Development and properties of low-calcium Flyash –based geopolymer concreteâ€, Research Report GC, Faculty of Engineering, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia, (2005).

      [6] Nath P & Sarker PK, “Geopolymer concrete for ambient curing conditionâ€, Australasian Structural Engineering Conference 2012: The past, present and future of Structural Engineering, (2012).

      [7] Mustafa Al Bakri A, Kamarudin H, Omar A, Norazian M, Ruzaidi C & Rafiza A, “The Effect Of Alkaline Activator Ratio On The Compressive Strength Of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymers,†Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, Vol.5, No.9, (2011), pp.1916-1922,

      [8] Mustafa Al Bakri A, Kamarudin H, Mohammed H, KhairulNizar I, Rafiza A & Zarina Y, “The relationship of NaOH molarity, Na2SiO3/NaOH ratio, fly ash/alkaline activator ratio, and curing temperature to the strength of fly ash-based geopolymerâ€, Advanced Materials Research, Vol.328, (2011), pp.1475-1482.

      [9] Mustafa Al Bakri A, Kamarudin H, Khairul Nizar I, Bnhussain M, Zarina Y & Rafiza A, “Correlation between Na2SiO3/NaOH ratio and fly ash/alkaline activator ratio to the strength of geopolymerâ€, Advanced Materials Research, Vol.341, (2012), pp.189-193.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Kumar Das, S. (2018). Parametric study of flyash based geopolymer concrete. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.31), 196-198. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.31.13439